With the way that sentence is structured, it has multiple meanings but I'm going to assume that you're asking whether I'm looking for "weirdos".
Sort of.
The reason I asked this question is because it's easy to succumb to an echo chamber. I think introducing more than one narrative, like the questions that @noname223 ask, help quench that.
If this pro-choice movement is going to get anywhere, it's by considering the validity in the other side. Yes, not everything anti-choice people say are true, but nor are the things we say. I hate to act like a Messiah, but if we can't admit that the loss of a life is a bad thing, then no one will want to associate with us, and no one will ever want to hear us out.
By asking this intentionally vague question, it's shown how the majority of people here think that suicide is a good thing depending on the situation. But nearly every other person, or "normie" won't buy it because its simply not true.
I will firstly emphasis that regardless of whether it is good or not, doesn't mean no one should have access to it. I'm not saying suicide should never be an option, and I'm actually in support of the right for anyone to die for any (substantial) reason.
But, deaths are deaths, and deaths are tragic, even if the person is truly better gone than here.
In most cases, people with any shroud of sympathy would be devastated to hear the stories on this forum; to see people leaving their last messages here. To think that such a thing is joyous is ridiculous. It's saddening to think that anyone could be driven to suicide by whatever reason they have. That's the overarching point I wanted to make with this post. Death, and suicide, are heartbreaking things regardless of the situation. Yes, you may be suffering - by all means, do what you think is best for you. But it's sadistic and cruel to suggest that people be smiling, and crying of joy whilst your casket is lowered into your grave.
