LetzteAusfahrt

LetzteAusfahrt

Swiss gay, will definitely ctb on October 10th
Jun 27, 2020
590
I'm surprised, I thought you'd created your mask to use inert gas?
Nitrogen was never an option for me. I didn't make the system for myself.
Nitrogen is too fast and too peaceful for me.

I want to be able to experience and enjoy my dying with a clear mind.
That is why I will not take any additional medication in addition to the SN
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Aww..
Reactions: it's_all_a_game, OnlyTheWind, Deleted-User-0 and 4 others
Deleted-User-0

Deleted-User-0

Experienced
Jan 30, 2020
217
Thanks @LetzteAusfahrt .
I'm still marvelling at your invention here how you managed to connect a nitrogen tank to a scuba mask.And you are also communicating expertly in English even though you are using Google Translate. You are a genius!.
https://sanctioned-suicide.net/attachments/img_20200827_202700_3-jpg.43119/

https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/inert-gas-method-and-pain.46853/#post-847343

You @LetzteAusfahrt and @Diver_K_A are really great guys. I hope you 2 don't ctb soon. I would love to talk to both of you again. This is one of the few reasons for me not to ctb yet to meet such intelligent and great individuals like the both of you.


Thanks man sometimes I wish I could buy a big land and people like us could come together to create a community and work on healing without any judgment oh well maybe one day ...
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: it's_all_a_game, nitroautnz, ReadyToGo72 and 3 others
UterEntonaur

UterEntonaur

Specialist
Aug 17, 2020
340
@Diver_K_A, @LetzteAusfahrt

Thank you both for the information in this thread. I found a few places locally (London, UK) that rent pure nitrogen tanks/welding equipment, but I didn't realise how expensive it can all get, so I know that's not an option for me. (I'll probably use SN but jumping from Beachy Head is my last resort)
 
  • Like
Reactions: LetzteAusfahrt and Deleted-User-0
T

TheQ22

Enlightened
Aug 17, 2020
1,097
It's surprising how the costs add up
 
  • Like
Reactions: nitroautnz and Thatdude
Deleted-User-0

Deleted-User-0

Experienced
Jan 30, 2020
217
@Diver_K_A, @LetzteAusfahrt

Thank you both for the information in this thread. I found a few places locally (London, UK) that rent pure nitrogen tanks/welding equipment, but I didn't realise how expensive it can all get, so I know that's not an option for me. (I'll probably use SN but jumping from Beachy Head is my last resort)

How much did they ask for a tank of nitrogen out of interest?
I have been to Beachy Head few years back I would personally never overcome my SI to jump.
 
T

Thatdude

Life is temporary, death is permanent
Sep 26, 2019
473
I know whole airplanes full of people have lost oxygen and reported no pain or discomfort afterwards, but they hadn't made it to the stage where the organs start shutting down. My understanding is that above all, the body protects the central nervous system. That would be the last thing to go. Being a NERVOUS system, wouldn't that suggest pain?

I plan on popping as many morphine pills as I can beforehand but there's a big difference between lack of consciousness and lack of sensation, right?

Something about the PPhb and Exit International folks.. they make it sound too easy.

Does anyone else feel that way?

This is the method I picked so far. As far as I can tell, there is no pain. You simply pass out, and then over a 20 to 40 min period you're dead. Now from what some have said, it's best to take muscle relaxers before doing it. That or strap whatever on you. Apparently the body has seizures or something like it as you die. I'm not sure how accurate this is.
How much did they ask for a tank of nitrogen out of interest?
I have been to Beachy Head few years back I would personally never overcome my SI to jump.

One of the newest methods uses a debreather system. It uses a closed system that has soda lime which absorb all the CO2 as you breath. That away you're only taking in Inert gasses
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LetzteAusfahrt
Deleted-User-0

Deleted-User-0

Experienced
Jan 30, 2020
217
This is the method I picked so far. As far as I can tell, there is no pain. You simply pass out, and then over a 20 to 40 min period you're dead. Now from what some have said, it's best to take muscle relaxers before doing it. That or strap whatever on you. Apparently the body has seizures or something like it as you die. I'm not sure how accurate this is.


The book also says it's preferable to sit on a chair and secure the tank by taping it to the chair. Human body can do whatever it can to survive even in unconsciousness remember we have been evolved to survive.
What muscle relaxers were you referring to?
 
bov

bov

Arcanist
Aug 26, 2020
405
This is the method I picked so far. As far as I can tell, there is no pain. You simply pass out, and then over a 20 to 40 min period you're dead. Now from what some have said, it's best to take muscle relaxers before doing it. That or strap whatever on you. Apparently the body has seizures or something like it as you die. I'm not sure how accurate this is.


One of the newest methods uses a debreather system. It uses a closed system that has soda lime which absorb all the CO2 as you breath. That away you're only taking in Inert gasses
They don't sell the debreather anymore. Hopefully they will again soon. Probably legal stuff.
 
T

Thatdude

Life is temporary, death is permanent
Sep 26, 2019
473
What muscle relaxers were you referring to?

That was never mentioned. Since I'm not close I never gather that fine of details on this.
They don't sell the debreather anymore. Hopefully they will again soon. Probably legal stuff.
Ya but can't we make our own?
I haven't seen much on the failure rate on this exact way, so this is making me iffy. But assuming the success rate is up there. It seems like a debreather would have a higher chance of success than the normal exit bag method.


Like I wouldn't recommend anyone to put a lot of faith into that one since there just isn't enough info on it. I can't find of anyone that died with one, and getting a break down of what you need to build one is iffy at best. But if it turns out to be something, I would think this would give the normal exit bag method a run for it's money.
 
Last edited:
Lastsauce

Lastsauce

Experienced
Dec 22, 2019
258
I'm pretty set on the nonrebreather mask, but I haven't yet tested one to see if it'll fit my face. If the fit isn't perfect, are there any adjustments I can make?
You just won't know if the seal holds when your facial muscles relax or spasm.
That's the reason why those small, non face covering medical masks are not recommended.
Maybe you could glue it to your face with superglue lol.
 
M

My_name_is_Luka

Specialist
Apr 28, 2020
320
You just won't know if the seal holds when your facial muscles relax or spasm.
That's the reason why those small, non face covering medical masks are not recommended.
Maybe you could glue it to your face with superglue lol.
Glue can't allow to abort the attempt. I'd rather use any soft and elastic substance used in bricolage / activities for children. There are so many things that can be shaped by hand and are sticky enough to be used to cover small leaks between 2 surfaces.

Anyway in my opinion the rebreather has more risks of failure than the exit bag. There isn't a constant flow of inhert gas that enters the mask, like when using a gas-tank. So if there is a leak in the mask, oxygen will come in and it will have to be inhaled (otherwise it's not burned) and go through some cycles in the soda lyme (so that CO2 is adsorbed). With the exit bag, there is a constant flow of gas from the gas-tank. This will efficiently create a flow of gas escaping the bag/mask from any small leak. If there is a flow of air going out (strong enough), air cannot come in from the same leak.

The rebreather was not constructed to be safer or more peacaful than the exit bag. It just avoids the gas-tank and it makes everything more portable and compact.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: it's_all_a_game, WearyOfStruggling, pthnrdnojvsc and 3 others
bov

bov

Arcanist
Aug 26, 2020
405
Why do you all think the American Veterinary Association opposed gas for euthanasia? They say it takes seven-eight minutes for a pig—do they think the pig feels pain that whole time??
 
D

Deleted member 23726

Student
Nov 13, 2020
153
You don't understand the method propery.

If you continuously feed gas into the pot with the hose, then the bag MUST be open at the bottom.
If only because the exhaled CO2 has to be transported out of the bag.

You must not close the hole that is created by the tube that is inserted.

It is best to glue the hose in the bag so that the gas flows out at the top point.

You can also use any plastic sack that already has built-in tape to tie it together.

You can also tie the string together over the bag after you've put it on. Or with an adhesive tape.

The string only serves to fasten the bag to something. Not to close the opening tightly
Why shouldnt we glue the hole where the hose enters the bag?
Why do you all think the American Veterinary Association opposed gas for euthanasia? They say it takes seven-eight minutes for a pig—do they think the pig feels pain that whole time??
I had the same question!
 
A

Aap

Enlightened
Apr 26, 2020
1,856
Glue a hole? You are fundamentally misunderstanding how an exit bag is constructed.

you are also completely misrepresenting the AVA's recommendations. Why don't you actually look at what the ava says and not regurgitate garbage posted on the internet?


S3.3 SWINE
Methods of euthanasia commonly applied to swine include CO2, gunshot, captive bolt, overdose of an anesthetic administered by a veterinarian, elec- trocution, and blunt force trauma (suckling piglets only). Gas mixtures of N2O, Ar, N2, and CO2 may also be used but are not currently commonly applied in the field. Selection of the most appropriate method for each situation is dependent upon size and weight of the animal, availability of equipment and facili- ties, operator skill and experience with the proce- dure, aesthetic concerns, human safety, and options for disposal of remains. Certain physical methods of euthanasia may require adjunctive methods such as exsanguination or pithing to ensure death. A brief de- scription of each method and appropriate candidates for it are described. Detailed information on inhaled, noninhaled, and physical methods of euthanasia may be found in the respective sections of this doc
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Greenberg
D

Deleted member 23726

Student
Nov 13, 2020
153
That was never mentioned. Since I'm not close I never gather that fine of details on this.

Ya but can't we make our own?
I haven't seen much on the failure rate on this exact way, so this is making me iffy. But assuming the success rate is up there. It seems like a debreather would have a higher chance of success than the normal exit bag method.


Like I wouldn't recommend anyone to put a lot of faith into that one since there just isn't enough info on it. I can't find of anyone that died with one, and getting a break down of what you need to build one is iffy at best. But if it turns out to be something, I would think this would give the normal exit bag method a run for it's money.
Are you talking about the debreather? Or nitrogen in general?
 
  • Hugs
Reactions: Greenberg
D

Deleted member 23726

Student
Nov 13, 2020
153
Glue a hole? You are fundamentally misunderstanding how an exit bag is constructed.

you are also completely misrepresenting the AVA's recommendations. Why don't you actually look at what the ava says and not regurgitate garbage posted on the internet?


S3.3 SWINE
Methods of euthanasia commonly applied to swine include CO2, gunshot, captive bolt, overdose of an anesthetic administered by a veterinarian, elec- trocution, and blunt force trauma (suckling piglets only). Gas mixtures of N2O, Ar, N2, and CO2 may also be used but are not currently commonly applied in the field. Selection of the most appropriate method for each situation is dependent upon size and weight of the animal, availability of equipment and facili- ties, operator skill and experience with the proce- dure, aesthetic concerns, human safety, and options for disposal of remains. Certain physical methods of euthanasia may require adjunctive methods such as exsanguination or pithing to ensure death. A brief de- scription of each method and appropriate candidates for it are described. Detailed information on inhaled, noninhaled, and physical methods of euthanasia may be found in the respective sections of this doc
Sorry I'm
New to this website. Who is AVA?
I know whole airplanes full of people have lost oxygen and reported no pain or discomfort afterwards, but they hadn't made it to the stage where the organs start shutting down. My understanding is that above all, the body protects the central nervous system. That would be the last thing to go. Being a NERVOUS system, wouldn't that suggest pain?

I plan on popping as many morphine pills as I can beforehand but there's a big difference between lack of consciousness and lack of sensation, right?

Something about the PPhb and Exit International folks.. they make it sound too easy.

Does anyone else feel that way?
I feel the same way, that the method is too easy to believe. Also, with morphine, wouldn't your breathing rate be slower and thus you may need more nitrogen? How can I get morphine? Also, why didn't you consider the debreather? What kind of mask/bag will you use?
 
Last edited:
  • Hugs
Reactions: Greenberg
A

Aap

Enlightened
Apr 26, 2020
1,856
Morphine would have no impact on the need for more nitrogen. The nitrogen isn't "doing" anything. It is replacing oxygen in the environment.
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: it's_all_a_game, Bauhaus and Greenberg
D

Deleted member 23726

Student
Nov 13, 2020
153
Morphine would have no impact on the need for more nitrogen. The nitrogen isn't "doing" anything. It is replacing oxygen in the environment.
But wouldn't it affect how quickly/slowly the person breathes? Like maybe morphine slows down the breathing and he would run out of nitrogen gas faster? Correct me if I'm wrong
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: Bauhaus and Greenberg
A

Aap

Enlightened
Apr 26, 2020
1,856
I understand your thought process, but it is mistaken. Slowly breathing nitrogen doesn't enable someone to survive longer in a zero oxygen environment than fast breathing. Again, nitrogen is not "doing" anything other than displacing oxygen around the head.

your thought process would be correct if you were breathing a toxic gas in a standard oxygen environment
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: it's_all_a_game, Bauhaus and Greenberg
D

Deleted member 23726

Student
Nov 13, 2020
153
This is the method I picked so far. As far as I can tell, there is no pain. You simply pass out, and then over a 20 to 40 min period you're dead. Now from what some have said, it's best to take muscle relaxers before doing it. That or strap whatever on you. Apparently the body has seizures or something like it as you die. I'm not sure how accurate this is.


One of the newest methods uses a debreather system. It uses a closed system that has soda lime which absorb all the CO2 as you breath. That away you're only taking in Inert gasses
Wouldnt we die faster than 20-40 mins? I heard it take five mins only ten to be sure
I understand your thought process, but it is mistaken. Slowly breathing nitrogen doesn't enable someone to survive longer in a zero oxygen environment than fast breathing. Again, nitrogen is not "doing" anything other than displacing oxygen around the head.

your thought process would be correct if you were breathing a toxic gas in a standard oxygen environment
Sorry i mean wouldnt the gas cylinder finish before death if breathing is very slow due to medication?
The book also says it's preferable to sit on a chair and secure the tank by taping it to the chair. Human body can do whatever it can to survive even in unconsciousness remember we have been evolved to survive.
What muscle relaxers were you referring to?
Isnt it better if we lay down in bed? If were sitting on a chair we could fall down when having seizures
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: Bauhaus and Greenberg
A

Aap

Enlightened
Apr 26, 2020
1,856
I understand what you are saying. Death will come at nearly the same speed regardless of fast or slow breathing.
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: Bauhaus and Greenberg
T

Thatdude

Life is temporary, death is permanent
Sep 26, 2019
473
Wouldnt we die faster than 20-40 mins? I heard it take five mins only ten to be sure


I think it has to deal more with how long it can be before you can't be revived. I could be wrong, and it should be noted I don't have a medical background. But this is just what I'm finding on the net.
 
  • Hugs
Reactions: Greenberg
D

Deleted member 23726

Student
Nov 13, 2020
153
I don't think that protection of the nervous system is a priority over any other organ system as such, but we have certainly evolved plenty of measures in order to keep it from harm. It may not be the last system to stop functioning, for example, all nerve cells may die, but cells in other systems may still continue to operate for some time afterwards, if they don't vitally depend on input from neurons. I would say however, that the nervous system is the system which most strongly defines our lives, because it is the one which enables experience itself.

There is a difference between consciousness and sensation. Consciousness may be defined as your experience, while sensation may be defined as the feelings of pain and pleasure. You may lose all sensation yet remain conscious, but you need consciousness in order to experience sensation.

I haven't thoroughly read the PPH and have only investigated Exit's recommendations a small amount. My impression was that there is certainly room for more information, more discussion about the details. Personally I would never describe any suicide method as "easy", and I do agree that they need to express the risks and potential points of failure more emphatically.

I am personally convinced that inert gas asphyxiation is painless because I have never read anything to the contrary. But I acknowledge that this isn't robust enough proof, it won't be enough to convince many people and rightfully so. Also, I do think there needs to be some kind of authority, a trustworthy point of reference that people can rely on in order to be confident in their method, and how much pain they can expect. I use Wikipedia for the most part, but it fails to touch on many crucial issues, namely the pain level experienced for any given method of suicide.
Do you think the inert gas method would still be painless even after a couple minutes in when the organs start getting damaged?
Basically just explain what the regulator does. I've seen posts asking about hooking the gas flow into a sealed system, which can create severe lung injury.
You mean it would create severe lung injury if someone released the inert gas into an enclosed, Small space?
 
profoundexperience

profoundexperience

You can feel the punishment but you cant commit ts
Jun 29, 2020
436
Do you think the inert gas method would still be painless even after a couple minutes in when the organs start getting damaged?
Unconsciousness is induced chemically for surgery -- to relieve a patient from feeling any pain. I've had surgery and have no recollection of being cut open, whatsoever.

The inert gas method, if done correctly, induces unconsciousness very quickly... well before bodily pain (if any exists) can be consciously experienced. One really shouldn't reach a "couple minutes" and still be awake.

Any pain signals (if any exist) sent after loss of consciousness are basically irrelevant.
You mean it would create severe lung injury if someone released the inert gas into an enclosed, Small space?
Inert gases are stored in containers at a much higher pressure than regular air. If one suddenly exposes their lungs (or any small, confined volume) to that high pressure -- like a balloon blown-up too much pops -- bodily damage can occur. That's the whole point of a "regulator": it down-regulates the high pressure to a more desirable pressure.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Eternal🌈Rainbow, it's_all_a_game and Bauhaus
D

Deleted member 23726

Student
Nov 13, 2020
153
Unconsciousness is induced chemically for surgery -- to relieve a patient from feeling any pain. I've had surgery and have no recollection of being cut open, whatsoever.

The inert gas method, if done correctly, induces unconsciousness very quickly... well before bodily pain (if any exists) can be consciously experienced. One really shouldn't reach a "couple minutes" and still be awake.

Any pain signals (if any exist) sent after loss of consciousness are basically irrelevant.

Inert gases are stored in containers at a much higher pressure than regular air. If one suddenly exposes their lungs (or any small, confined volume) to that high pressure -- like a balloon blown-up too much pops -- bodily damage can occur. That's the whole point of a "regulator": it down-regulates the high pressure to a more desirable pressure.
Oh thank you so much profoundexperience. But i wanted to ask: doesnt the general anesthesia Used in surgeries block the pain signals? Meanwhile the inert gas just makes us unconscious but doesnt block pain signals. Why arent they using the nitrogen method for executions yet or for euthanizing animals or for legal assisted suicide if its painless? I know its painless (at least in the beginning) but im just worried it would become painful later on
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miiau, Miri, Bauhaus and 1 other person
profoundexperience

profoundexperience

You can feel the punishment but you cant commit ts
Jun 29, 2020
436
doesnt the general anesthesia Used in surgeries block the pain signals? Meanwhile the inert gas just makes us unconscious but doesnt block pain signals.
An apt analogy: If a tree falls in the woods, and there's nobody there to hear it, does it make a sound? If you're completely unconscious, what difference do any pain signals make?

If there even are such signals: Inert gas has been used by many and witnesses don't generally report believing the person was in pain. Certainly nothing like some other methods favored here.

And, if done properly, the brain itself (perceiver of pain) is very quickly shutting down/dying. So if there is pain AND if there is some kind of way unconsciously to perceive it (I don't think there is either)... in the worst case it could last only for an incredibly short time.
Why arent they using the nitrogen method for executions yet or for euthanizing animals or for legal assisted suicide if its painless?
There's a BBC documentary called How to Kill a Human Being. I highly recommend it. You can find it in a couple of mainstream video sites and I think it is in the SS wiki. It compares several methods and concludes inert gas/nitrogen to be the "most humane". At the very end, he confronts a "death penalty advocate" who basically says he would oppose nitrogen BECAUSE the death penalty shouldn't be humane -- it should be painful for the criminal. Isn't that special??

The PPH doctor guy is developing "Sarco" device/capsule which uses inert gas for legally assisted & I know a few months ago he was preparing to test on real people in Switzerland... so, it is coming for that. I suspect it has been slow because doctors already have infallible methods like N.

As far as animals for slaughter... that's also kinda covered in the BBC documentary. I suspect the expense of switching-over slaughterhouses (economics and safety of plant personnel) is keeping it from happening... at least so far.
I know its painless (at least in the beginning) but im just worried it would become painful later on
If done correctly, there shouldn't be much of a "later on" at all.

And, your concern applies to all methods... and actually all deaths whatsoever... not just inert gas: Can an unconscious, ~dead body experience pain in any appreciable way? I think the scientific consensus is no.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: it's_all_a_game, Bauhaus and Deleted member 23726
A

Aap

Enlightened
Apr 26, 2020
1,856
It has been proposed for executions. Second, your brain dies before your other organ systems, so your question of pain when they "shut down" is moot. Third, you aren't fully understanding the purpose of anesthetics or pain. Pain has two components - the conscious component (feeling pain) plus a physiologic component. When your body experiences pain, there are definite physiologic happenings (increase BP, HR, respiration rate, cortisol release, etc.). These are detrimental for surgery, and the anesthetics used block both conscious and physiologic responses to pain.

in the context of ctb, it is irrelevant. Under inert gas when unconscious, you have absolutely no perception of pain. Even if it were painful as you die from it (which it absolutely is not), you would not perceive anything.

I understand where your line of questioning is coming from, but it is misguided. Your brain dies before the rest of you, and were there pain (which there is NOT) there would be no perception of pain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miri, it's_all_a_game, Bauhaus and 2 others
D

Deleted member 23726

Student
Nov 13, 2020
153
@LetzteAusfahrt , @Diver_K_A
I will do a nitrogen scuba mask too. I will rig up a scuba mask (no leaks tested under water already) to a nitrogen tank . So this my method is just like scuba diving but instead of having an oxygen tank i switch the oxygen tank to a nitrogen tank and fool the brain stem. My method is to use it underwater since it is a scuba mask:
1. I hold my breath . 2. I put on the nitrogen scuba mask. 3 I submerge myself under the water still holding my breath

4. once under the water i'll clip on to a chain to weights so that i can't resurface.

5.once i'm locked under water then i breathe in nitrogen under water so i'll be unconscious in 20 seconds . i'll be locked underwater without the capability to resurface. so even if my survival instinct removes the mask then i'll drown anyway . so there is no chance of brain damage and no chance of survival. Do you think it will work?Do you see any thing that might make this fail ?

I was able to obtain several nitrogen tanks from a local welding shop so i'm pumped! They didn't even ask any questions just sold them to me . very nice people. so i have an unlimited nitrogen supply to do testing! This is going to work!

The slovak guy suceeded with a nitrogen suba mask in air though not underwater like my method:
This guy in India used a nose mask not a scuba nitrogen mask :
Why do you want to do it underwater?
 
pthnrdnojvsc

pthnrdnojvsc

Extreme Pain is much worse than people know
Aug 12, 2019
2,619
Why do you want to do it underwater?
It's just an idea i had of diving underwater with a nitrogen tank in place of an oxygen tank. I was just thinking of drowning but using nitrogen to pass out quickly underwater. My main method would be drowning just trying to inhale just enough nitrogen to blackout and so not feel the pain of drowning. If it doesn't work i still drown. i just want to die but would be better wih no pain. So it's risky cause you might just drown and feel pain anyway so don't try this at home. but it's a risk i might take if i can get the details of this to be realiable, the mask, technique etc.. My main goal is to die.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 23726

Student
Nov 13, 2020
153
That sounds extremely elaborate. My impulse for overcoming the si is just to take a few heavy sedatives 20 mins before switching on the gas. @LetzteAusfahrt has discouraged me from that course of action, saying it would amp up the risk of a botched attempt. While he may be right, I suspect most of the skill is required in the setup, which I would do in a state of sobriety. With sedatives, I think switching on the gas might feel like switching on a nightlight.
He told you its better not to take sedatives prior?
 
  • Love
Reactions: Greenberg

Similar threads

S
Replies
1
Views
272
Suicide Discussion
shinigami_1992
S
GuessWhosBack
Replies
7
Views
1K
Recovery
butterflyguy
butterflyguy
007Bob
Replies
106
Views
13K
Suicide Discussion
Rudi
Rudi