I realise virtually nobody is going to agree with me but I'm interested about you guys opinions on this regardless. Im glad this site exists for the fact that it allows a unique place where you're not judged for being suicidal. I think the fact that it provides more painless ways to CTB is actually great. I also think this site is good for the fact it allows people to vent, as well as find like minded people, especially since suicide is such a taboo topic usually. It feels like on paper this site existing is just fine.
The thing I dislike about this site existing is its capacity to influence people negatively (I'm not sure if that's the right way to put it but bear with me). I wouldn't really ever consider myself suicidal, not that I would consider myself 'pro life' either, but I'm not really suicidal. That being said, after spending quite a bit of time on this site for the past few days I found myself seriously considering CTB for the first time in years. That happening might say more about me than it does about the site, but it still kinda rubbed me the wrong way. I can't help but think that people who would've never truly considered CTB or had the nerve to do it were driven to it by this site.
so basically I cant decide wether I'd rather this site does exist, or it doesn't.
I also experience a lot of ambivalence towards this site. I think it is a normal feeling/concern.
The conclusion I've come to after much meditation and deliberation is that the website serves a function that is well needed and does overall more good than harm, but
a lot more safeguards, oversight, and capacity resources are needed for it to achieve its goals (reduce harm, including emotional harm or the risk of serious injury from certain methods/practices) effectively and safely.
But until the stigma of suicide ends and the rest of society starts taking end of life care for voluntary dying seriously, we won't see those safeguards or capacity met due to practical limitations of the underground.
I can't really blame those running this site since they're just doing their best within the limitations imposed on them by prohibitionists (what many call "pro-lifers" although I've grown to dislike that term too because it has evolved to simply represent a very generalized out-group prejudice/scapegoat on this site; I'm not sure many really have a standardized nor meaningful definition for it). They're in a really rough spot and it's really unfair the way the site and Rain/the mods are targeted and misrepresented by the media.
I wish there was a trained, harm-reductive, person-centered, compassion club style model where people who will inevitably ctb on their own terms could have psycho-social-spiritual support in dying with people trained in neutral pro-choice language. People who could advise people on the benefits and risks of different methods and provide companionship without necessarily assisting in the procedure of suicide itself.
The cultural influence of this website seems apparent to me, even if there's no way to prove it (as
@RainAndSadness has claimed to me) or disprove it.
I'd love to see research on this topic too but doubt that will happen due to the aforementioned practical limitations to resources/capacity... it's possible the (fairly under-utilized) recovery section and sense of community solidarity has a net positive but this also has yet to be empirically evaluated so it's impossible to say. All we can do is reliably speculate that there is reasonably some effect from this culture. The magnitude of the effect is the real question.
It's frustrating as hell when we're all just left to our own – dying – devices trying to figure it out and the rest of society can't even fathom having the hard conversation around the right to die. They're having enough trouble as it is with the conversation around MAID for people who obviously can consent and have oftentimes terminal illnesses...
"The facts are always friendly" - Carl Rogers
I think both sides of the coin are not 100% aligned with the facts. However, I think the prohibitionist side of the coin is far less aligned with the facts, as most of them just take prohibitionist rhetoric for granted. At least the pro-choice perspectives on this forum are actively engaged and critical about the topic, even if the culture may be overly cynical/biased at times.
/Vent