D
ddutch
Done with life
- Oct 28, 2018
- 396
And how do we know a shotgun blast that pulpifies a brain faster than the speed of sound is more painful than Nembutal? Nobody can argue with the fact that N sure looks pretty ("more peaceful") as compared to a gory blood bath, so if you want to star in an open casket funeral it's definitely the way to go.
It seems that N is sacred on this forum and some get upset if anyone dares to point out legitimate problems with it. Though these same people are just fine with terrifying every would-be gun suicide with the idea that they will surely blow their face off & need a face transplant. They will ignore that the vast bulk of gunshot survivors did not use a shotgun -- they used handguns & often wimpy handguns at that (with .22LR being common, despite being the weakest caliber possible). And those gunshot survivors mostly put the muzzle under their chin, which resulted in facial destruction, rather than shotgun in mouth which results in a brain being instantly pulpified.
No method is 100% so all one can do is try to decide between various methods that are all imperfect and weigh the pros & cons of each. I'm terrified of how painful a shotgun blast will be, though I know the brain has no pain receptors so it can't feel itself being destroyed and it's also clear that a shotgun makes one dead faster than any other method so the duration of pain is limited.
for me it is very clear I prefer Nembutal over a shotgun or whatever.
Because
1 It brings me in a deep coma , so i am not aware of anything anymore.
2 Pain is minimal not like shooting wrong or cutting, more like drinking, i TESTEd it myself
3 I love sleeping so nembutal is my way
4 In holland we have strickt gun laws and I dont like guns because way to many innocent people who die by shooting it is way to violent.
5 The 6 cases that went wrong still sound Positive of the hundreds worldwide.