• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
reloadmyrifle

reloadmyrifle

she/her
Apr 7, 2024
9
When parents decide to give birth, they always do so for their own satisfaction or goals. A person who is not born cannot have needs or exercise an influence on the world. Nor can a person who isn't born consent to such a thing. By giving birth the parents create additional suffering.
The argument that "life is somehow beautiful and that a person is lucky to be alive to experience the happiness of this world. " I don't think this reasoning works because if a person had never been born, no such need would have been created. There would be no need to have meaningful experiences or anything of the sort. Suffering would be physically impossible, in fact there would be no concept of it.
I understand people who value birth and life, for the simple reason that a culture has to value these things in order to have survived this long. But from a moral point of view, giving birth is extremely callous and selfish.

Also, with overpopulation coming to a rise giving birth is also burdening other life forms and the Earth itself. There is no need for more humans on this planet.


If someone disagrees on my point of view please enlighten me because this is just my perspective of life. I don't mean to have such a negative outlook on human creation, but in my eyes life is suffering.
Im at the point that I cannot sympathize with a pregnant woman, and I cannot understand how this world does simply for the fact that I know that child will be subjected to suffering. My parents created me out of their selfish desires to be fulfilled in life. Because of their actions I am subjected to a cruel fate which can only be escaped by death
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: MrMegalomaniac, 3rdworldsadness, enso and 2 others
Passenger4224

Passenger4224

I appreciate everything that can kill me.
Mar 8, 2026
635
Having kids is also a huge gamble. You don't know if they're going to turn out to be the next superhuman or if they'll be as fucked up and deformed as I am. It is pure selfishness to take that chance, especially nowadays!

I will never forgive my parents. Ever.
 
  • Love
Reactions: 3rdworldsadness
imontheloose

imontheloose

Aspiring corpse
Jan 15, 2025
180
Ideally we'd have some nutjob seize power and force mass extinction. Procreation prolongs suffering; it is the worst crime ever.
 
  • Love
Reactions: 3rdworldsadness
Somewhat Suicidal

Somewhat Suicidal

surviving anhedonia ≠ living
Aug 26, 2026
440
I have to say I don't agree but I get your drift from a moral standpoint regarding the person who is given birth.
Probably not much use in arguing with about this tho, it's a matter of opinion after all

But seriously do we need 3 separate new antinatalist threads every day. Just write some posts in existing topics that interest you (I think it's 20), use the search function and you will 1000 others like this within the past year alone probably...
I still think search function should be available immdiately, I don't get why its not
 
  • Love
Reactions: 3rdworldsadness
enso

enso

Member
Aug 4, 2026
44
Hi! Your point is absolutely valid!

Different people just see life differently. For some - life is full of good memories, they live in democratic nations, they are not influenced by conservative/patriarchal agenda (it goes both for men and women), they have low to none risk of dying in some military conflict. And even that is not 100% defence against nihilsm and depression.

But it is just an evolution. For example, some people think bringing new life is selfish and they do not reproduce. As a result, people, who think other way - reproduce. This is just basic evolutionary law. It just comes this way that antinatalists can't become majority, because other part, who will keep reproducing, will become majority. Even if we look into birth rate decline, it is not because people just don't want to have children at all, many want, they just can not afford it, because current family is fully atomized comparing to families that existed earlier in human history, where raising of children was duty of all village/settlement and not only one mother and father.

But, anyway, it seems like with technological progress - AI advancement and robotics development, there just will be no need in many amount of human beings there. So, whether you are efilist/antinatalist or not, it comes true. Current trend shows that amount of people will become less and less
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: 3rdworldsadness and Somewhat Suicidal

Similar threads

V
Replies
47
Views
2K
Suicide Discussion
Redleaf1992
Redleaf1992
alwayspissedoff
Replies
39
Views
994
Suicide Discussion
MissAbyss
MissAbyss
AloneGunManTheory
Replies
0
Views
84
Suicide Discussion
AloneGunManTheory
AloneGunManTheory
A
Replies
2
Views
107
Suicide Discussion
Archie2222
A