• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
x22

x22

Really need advice
Oct 30, 2024
42
Asking this question again with a little more specificity.

I'm not ready to go into an attempt knowing I'll succeed, so when I do attempt I want to be able to reassure myself. Which methods have the lowest risk of lasting damage (especially brain damage) in the event of survival? To be clear, I don't want methods with such high lethality that brain damage is unlikely. I want to know about methods that, if they DO fail, have low long-term risks.

(I know every method has some risk of brain damage just because of how death works. I just want to know the best odds.)
 
  • Hugs
Reactions: gottacheckout
locked*n*loaded

locked*n*loaded

Archangel
Apr 15, 2022
9,592
I don't think I'd want to play death's bookie on giving odds of least likely to cause lasting damage in event of an unsuccessful ctb attempt. I don't even think it's possible to do that. Too many variables. Aside from crashing your car, throwing yourself in front of a train, self-immolation, or firearm, all the other "popular" methods - drowning, hanging, CO, inert gas, even SN - carry with them O2 deprivation, which can definitely lead to neurological damage in the event of a failure. And any of the ones that don't (involve O2 deprivation) can still leave you mighty messed-up if they don't work out, also. Maybe VSED suits your needs best. It can still leave internal damage, though, if it, too, doesn't work out.

Idk. I think it's akin to making a fool's bet with unknown and incalculable odds if trying to bank on a certain method causing you the least harm in the event things don't go quite as planned. I understand your concern. I just don't see any way to arrive at a legitimate and reliable answer to your query. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: gottacheckout and Dante_
x22

x22

Really need advice
Oct 30, 2024
42
I don't think I'd want to play death's bookie on giving odds of least likely to cause lasting damage in event of an unsuccessful ctb attempt. I don't even think it's possible to do that. Too many variables. Aside from crashing your car, throwing yourself in front of a train, self-immolation, or firearm, all the other "popular" methods - drowning, hanging, CO, inert gas, even SN - carry with them O2 deprivation, which can definitely lead to neurological damage in the event of a failure. And any of the ones that don't (involve O2 deprivation) can still leave you mighty messed-up if they don't work out, also. Maybe VSED suits your needs best. It can still leave internal damage, though, if it, too, doesn't work out.

Idk. I think it's akin to making a fools bet with unknown and incalculable odds if trying to bank on a certain method causing you the least harm in the event things don't go quite as planned. I understand your concern. I just don't see any way to arrive at a legitimate and reliable answer to your query. Sorry.
Yeah, that's kind of what I figured. Thanks for the response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gottacheckout and locked*n*loaded

Similar threads