F
ForsakenDial
Student
- Aug 20, 2021
- 168
The general statement is blatantly flawed. That was specifically expressed to you. Let us look at it again since you wish to continue being dishonest.It was a general statement.
The very posted you quoted explained why it was a fictitious and weak argument. Your post argues in-your-face incels are less of a threat then the "real ones". Both are a threat to women. Both have the same desires to hurt women as shown indefinite times within incel communities. Incels have killed and rape women. They celebrate the suffering of women. Keep trying to obfuscate that.I personally think some women are obsessed with in-your-face incels, and miss the real threats. But whatevs, let's see how that works out
Did anyone argue otherwise? Is this not what the thread has been saying themselves? You're linking and referencing a quote that no one here disagrees with. You're proving nothing by doing this.Incels are losers under patriarchy & can be organized. Their rage is legitimate & can attack the proper target: patriarchal men & women. As bell hooks argues:
No one in this thread has qualms with this. Not once was it expressed in this thread that anyone was against pointing incels in the proper direction; Holding the society that placed sexist standards on men just as it did women.By way of analogy, consider Redneck Revolt, who goes into the US's deep South to organize people who are losers under wageslavery. This means people who are often virulently racist — like how incels are often virulently misogynist... This is counter-intuitive for some — why organize people who participate in the KKK? Because if you don't, the KKK will! And the KKK will redirect their legitimate rage away from elites — towards underdogs who didn't do shit to them. Divide & conquer the wageslaves
Women are complaining about the constant incel threads popping up about how women are to blame for all their problems. You're transforming a simple complaint about an issue on these forums into entirely new scope and still you're fighting ghost here. You're debating yourself.
It is because incels refuse to engage with women as if they were people. Incels rather kill people. Incels rather force women to sleep with them and choose to be misogynistic. Women are not to blame for the patriarchy that constricts their lives. The very person you quote says this herself:Just like women on this thread. The OP's concluding sentence perfectly illustrates bell hook's point: "I have a lot of sympathy for incels. Actually, I believe that they are a product of our capitalistic and uncaring society , but ultimately they need a reality check and possibly a dating app."
Ok, if this is the attitude of sympathetic women, guess who'll organize lonely men. The manosphere. And the manosphere is pro-patriarchy
This alone makes it difficult for women to ever cross that barrier. Many men fight for their right to live their life as they choose. For society to no longer judge them for not fitting within the mascline mold that held them for so long. Only men can choose that for themselves. No women can force them. There are no freedoms men are being denied by law. There is no supreme court ruling that determined what a man could do with his body. But the law does tell what his sisters and mothers can do with theirs.They feel sorry for men because they see how patriarchy wounds them and yet men remain wedded to patriarchal culture.
And lets not lump all men in with incels. The vast majority of men are not incels. The vast majority of men are not in the manosphere. The vast majority of men are good people.
Minnie is right in this particular part of this book. Only men can choose to liberate themselves from the social confines. No women can do it for them. Women have already made it clear they are willing to support them when they decide to.While visionary thinkers have called attention to the way patriarchy hurts men, there has never been an ongoing effort made to address male pain. To this day I hear individual feminist women express their concern for the plight of men within patriarchy, even as they share that they are unwilling to give their energy to help educate and change men. Feminist writer Minnie Bruce Pratt states the position clearly: "How are men going to change? The meeting between two people, where one opposes the other, is the point of change. But I don't want the personal contact. I don't want to do it.... When people talk about not giving men our energies, I agree with that.... They have to deliver themselves." These attitudes, coupled with the negative attitudes of most men toward feminist thinking, meant that there was never a collective, affirming call for boys and men to join feminist movement so that they would be liberated from patriarchy.
You're completely misrepresenting this chart. Women have went further left and men had stayed relatively the same in the United States. The vast majority of men support abortion rights, equal rights, and gay rights within the States. South Korea for the longest time has had an extremely abusive system towards women which caused the 4B movement. My knowledge on Germany is limited but it has always been far more left leaning than the United States in comparison. A similar case to the UK.
This is about the idealogy gap between genders but does not state what this idealogy is. You again proved nothing. Do you think quoting writers and charts out of context proves anything? Did you actually study any of these things you are referencing or pretending to know what you're talking about?
Those are the people you choose to surround yourself with. Those men you choose to be around is not the majority of people. Most people do not know who Fresh & Fit are. And most of them who do know they are a laughing stock who don't practice what they preach. They are more emotional and irrational than the majority of women on that show.So let me be clear. I don't know incels irl — I first learned about them here on SaSu. The guys I know have gals, and are charming & successful. Last month, I had a literal locker room talk with one such fellow, who noticed I was listening to Fresh & Fit. I started to joke in embarrassment about my toxic masculinity — and he said no: it's absurd that women have the full vote, their decisionmaking is irrational, etc This isn't a one-off. I keep hearing this from men, a dark enlightenment that their sympathy for women was in error; that women are over-emotional talkative buffoons; that our elders were sadly right in stripping them of political participation, because a woman with a vote is like a chimp with a machinegun. That locker room wasn't cheap to get into. These men are the organized ones of my kind, with networks, motivation & skills. I've needed to fight men who attacked girls & women. (Unlike all those virtue-signaling feminists who don't lift a finger for poor women, and can't even define patriarchy.) And I think: the winners are the ones who'll rollback the gains of women's movements — even ones now considered social common sense, like the right to vote
Shocker. People are individuals. There are bad people of both genders. Its not the gotcha you think it is.I suppose you should note the traitors amongst women too..
Let's be honest now. You're roleplaying. You're not helping anyone. You're probably spending all day consuming redpill content and pretending to be an enlightened soul as you copy and paste quotes out of context. Your response earlier to @BojackHorseman was women masterbait with dead animals in their mouths. Do you think that makes you look good? Then changed the scope of discussion because you was thoroughly proven to be someone who actually has no substance to what they say.Here endeth my rant. Instead of answering online flames, I have irl people to help — mostly women. People are suffering all around me. One woman gets on my case for wasting time on argumentative suicide-forum people: "They're dying anyway"
She's right. I'm responding to the moaning of the dead. It's the living who act to solve problems, and could use my assistance. Flame away
Theres a reason you chose to go on a suicide forum to babble bombastically and say ultimately nothing. Its because you thought you wouldn't get any pushback, and will have the comfort in thinking anyone who disagrees with you will die anyway. Don't choke on your pacifier while you're at it.