Why is there no mention and discussion about firearms in the peaceful pill handbook
Isnt' it one of the more peaceful ways to die
Isnt' it one of the more peaceful ways to die
-
Hey Guest,
We wanted to share a quick update with the community.
Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.
👉 View the ledger hereOver the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):Ethereum (ETH):Monero (XMR):
TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 7,504
I think it's probably because the PPeH is mainly focused on fairly peaceful and non-violent methods, therefore firearms (which results in a bloody mess, literally and figuratively speaking) would not be considered. Furthermore, on a practical level, I believe that the PPeH is written in consideration for an international audience, which includes audiences from others countries outside of the US and most countries outside of the US generally have much more restrictive access to legal firearms in terms of procurement, possession, and usage.Similar threads
Method Question about Korean method- Past-Expiry-Date
- Suicide Discussion
Suicide Discussioneggsausagerice
