deathwish

deathwish

-
Jun 16, 2018
76
Have always been able to sum up my death wish with the comparison of time spent suffering vs. time spent not suffering. Suffering outweighs not suffering; to paraphrase, life is more bad than it is good; therefore, why live? If something tastes more gross than tasty, you may still want to eat it because it's healthy or you're starving but there's no such benefit for a baseline thing like all of life being more gross than tasty.

Recently, however, I have ended up in a relationship and being around that person dampens my suffering by a huge amount, like 90% less. Life isn't fun or fulfilling, I'm not doing anything important or that I even need or even want to be doing, but I'm not wallowing in despair very frequently as before. I'd call this akin to complacency, in that I'm complacent to stay alive for the time being.

my question/the point:
Is such described complacency truly a worthwhile reason to stay alive? "Truly a worthwhile reason" being built with all the cynicism and suicidal ideation this forum can offer. If you could feel this way, suffering so much less than usual, would that be enough? Do you think it should?

Am mostly curious. For my answer.. well, as said, right now it is literally/practically enough of a reason. But for a theoretical long term, I don't like it, don't think it's good enough, I still want to die for all the other reasons. Just because I don't feel like shit doesn't mean things are not fucking shit and life isn't worth living.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Hugs
Reactions: Ender, Wrennie, NodusTollens and 6 others
BandAddict

BandAddict

Specialist
Apr 3, 2019
338
Well, I'm shit at decisions, but the state that you're describing sounds similar to one I was in for close to a year. It wasn't a relationship with a person entirely (though I did have one social connection for part of that time). I feel like my ED helped to occupy my day/mind and give me a sense of security and accomplishment. It was kind of ironic, because the whole idea was to "succeed" at my ED before I could CTB, but ended up in a place like you described: Complacency. In a way, I became so attached/comfortable with it, that I felt like I wasn't too apposed to just existing, as long as things didn't change too much. But at some point the repercussions started to catch up to me, and it was apparent to family, so I decided to recover. Now I'm back to wanting to fucking die. So... Not sure how smart that was.

TDLR:
I can relate to that state of mind, but I can't say whether it's worth it or not, though it could be case-sensitive of course.

It's nice that you've found someone that's lessened your suffering, best regards.
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: Belaya Noch, NodusTollens, sourpink and 1 other person
RealHumanBean

RealHumanBean

Student
Aug 8, 2020
102
Well, I'm shit at decisions, but the state that you're describing sounds similar to one I was in for close to a year. It wasn't a relationship with a person entirely (though I did have one social connection for part of that time). I feel like my ED helped to occupy my day/mind and give me a sense of security and accomplishment. It was kind of ironic, because the whole idea was to "succeed" at my ED before I could CTB, but ended up in a place like you described: Complacency. In a way, I became so attached/comfortable with it, that I felt like I wasn't too apposed to just existing, as long as things didn't change too much. But at some point the repercussions started to catch up to me, and it was apparent to family, so I decided to recover. Now I'm back to wanting to fucking die. So... Not sure how smart that was.

TDLR:
I can relate to that state of mind, but I can't say whether it's worth it or not, though it could be case-sensitive of course.

It's nice that you've found someone that's lessened your suffering, best regards.
What is ED in this context? I've only ever seen that used as an abbreviation for erectile dysfunction, but that doesn't seem to fit here.
Have always been able to sum up my death wish with the comparison of time spent suffering vs. time spent not suffering. Suffering outweighs not suffering; to paraphrase, life is more bad than it is good; therefore, why live? If something tastes more gross than tasty, you may still want to eat it because it's healthy or you're starving but there's no such benefit for a baseline thing like all of life being more gross than tasty.

Recently, however, I have ended up in a relationship and being around that person dampens my suffering by a huge amount, like 90% less. Life isn't fun or fulfilling, I'm not doing anything important or that I even need or even want to be doing, but I'm not wallowing in despair very frequently as before. I'd call this akin to complacency, in that I'm complacent to stay alive for the time being.

my question/the point:
Is such described complacency truly a worthwhile reason to stay alive? "Truly a worthwhile reason" being built with all the cynicism and suicidal ideation this forum can offer. If you could feel this way, suffering so much less than usual, would that be enough? Do you think it should?

Am mostly curious. For my answer.. well, as said, right now it is literally/practically enough of a reason. But for a theoretical long term, I don't like it, don't think it's good enough, I still want to die for all the other reasons. Just because I don't feel like shit doesn't mean things are not fucking shit and life isn't worth living.
In my experience, complacency worsens the suffering that follows. Each iteration gets harder to deal with. When your relationship ends and you're alone again, your suffering will return but with added flavor.

I know this is really morose, but I've never in my life experienced a different pattern of events. There's a calm nothingness followed by a storm of suffering, numbed out for a while and somehow find your way back to calm nothingness so the cycle can repeat.

How do we break the cycle?
 
Last edited:
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: Belaya Noch and BandAddict
BandAddict

BandAddict

Specialist
Apr 3, 2019
338
What is ED in this context? I've only ever seen that used as an abbreviation for erectile dysfunction, but that doesn't seem to fit here.
Oops, I'm sorry. ED is "eating disorder". For some reason it feels weird to type it out.
 
  • Hugs
  • Like
Reactions: RealHumanBean and sourpink
sourpink

sourpink

Student
Aug 27, 2020
148
the query you pose here is imo a philosophical matter. or, at least, I look at this through the lenses of absurdism/existentialism/nihilism. and then of course whatever conclusion you or I or the holy spirit of David Bowie come to as a result will be entirely unique and subjective.
personally, I don't think complacency can be a lifelong state. it's bound to end sooner than one would like and often leaves us worse than where we started before finding complacent ground. but does that make it unworthy of being experienced? I can only answer that for myself, as you for yourself etc etc.
I'm not exactly sure how I'd answer this for myself. part of me is and always has been that artist seeking life experience to create and draw from, and would dive in, because why the hell not? I'm gonna die, and ideally I'll be in control of when and how I die, so .. sticking around to see what one particular Rollercoaster ride has to offer does have some appeal in my mind. but then a much larger fragment of my person knows the experience and its potential positive perceptions must come to a halt eventually, and I know I won't enjoy that and the feelings that might awaken - why bother?
I guess, in trying to look at this contemplation in a way at all 'positive', I'd revisit Camus and absurdism as a whole. (if I've misunderstood philosophical theories, please do let me know, lol.) existence has no meaning outside of what we build for ourselves, but that lack of external acknowledgment/understanding shouldn't be a deterrent to experiencing existence as it reveals itself to each of us.
so, I guess I have no idea either.
specifically thinking about romantic arrangements though, I'm not into that. I'm not aromantic, but I enjoy being single and I feel if I were to want to find/build a relationship I'd need to be in a substantially improved state of being and mind, neither of which are likely or feasible- at least not at this time.
I can see how finding positivity in romance would lead to possible optimism, and maybe I'm just a bitter jaded bitch, but I wouldn't want to open myself up for any further wounds. I definitely would (and have!) get the happy happy joy joy feelings and feel a possibly similar conflict, though. so, my sympathies.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: deathwish, 262653 and BandAddict
262653

262653

Cluesome
Apr 5, 2018
1,733
Have always been able to sum up my death wish with the comparison of time spent suffering vs. time spent not suffering. Suffering outweighs not suffering; to paraphrase, life is more bad than it is good; therefore, why live?
You mean, why would one want to do something one doesn't want to do? Or why one keeps doing something one doesn't want to do?

Today I'm thinking of the whole decision making apparatus as a congress, or a senate. I feel affiliated to the party that prioritizes the quality of experience, where: good life > nothing > bad life. Let's call it Quality party.

There seem to be at least one other party though, which seem to prioritize existence over non-existence: life > nothing. "Life party" would be a good name for this instance. The voice of this party seems to be more influential in life-death affairs, and it seems to have the main voice in deciding when to live and when not to live, or at least it has more voice in this matter than Quality party.

And then there has to be a third power which can potentially side with Quality party to triumph against Life party in life-death affairs. I'll call it Emotional party for now. This party has immense power but its priorities are not apparent to me. It's not clear to me why this party votes for a particular option, or why sometimes it doesn't vote in the first place.

So if I would to ask myself why the death sentence wasn't passed so far, I'd say that so far it didn't get enough votes.

(Not the best example. How does Quality party determine the quality? What's the criteria? Emotions seem to be at play here. I can't think of a better example right now, so feel free to make propositions.)
my question/the point:
Is such described complacency truly a worthwhile reason to stay alive? "Truly a worthwhile reason" being built with all the cynicism and suicidal ideation this forum can offer. If you could feel this way, suffering so much less than usual, would that be enough? Do you think it should?
Processing these questions with the same framework, the output would be: if my devotion lies in the Quality party, then, if this complacency is characterized by good things in life outweighing bad things in life (since the relationship was started and until now), then yes. Otherwise no.
I would still keep the retreat routes open and ready to be used since it's a possibility that the relationship might end before I die.

---

I guess I could say that I've been in a sort of partnership that made my life less unworthy of experiencing, but it was not enough to rise the quality of life above zero.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deathwish and BandAddict
deathwish

deathwish

-
Jun 16, 2018
76
But at some point the repercussions started to catch up to me, and it was apparent to family, so I decided to recover. Now I'm back to wanting to fucking die. So... Not sure how smart that was.

TDLR:
I can relate to that state of mind, but I can't say whether it's worth it or not, though it could be case-sensitive of course.

It's nice that you've found someone that's lessened your suffering, best regards.

In my experience, complacency worsens the suffering that follows. Each iteration gets harder to deal with. When your relationship ends and you're alone again, your suffering will return but with added flavor.

I know this is really morose, but I've never in my life experienced a different pattern of events. There's a calm nothingness followed by a storm of suffering, numbed out for a while and somehow find your way back to calm nothingness so the cycle can repeat.

How do we break the cycle?

Thanks very much both of you, RealHumanBean and BandAddict, for sharing your experiences. It's all totally interesting, insightful, and helpful to me. Your conclusions are very similar too...post-complacency is more suffering. And we all wonder if it's worth. How do we break the cycle.....well, fix the core issues but of course if we could do that.....

i guess i'll ride this out and keep preparing for the bus, so when it ends, i don't need to panic, can just go all ready.
the query you pose here is imo a philosophical matter. or, at least, I look at this through the lenses of absurdism/existentialism/nihilism. and then of course whatever conclusion you or I or the holy spirit of David Bowie come to as a result will be entirely unique and subjective.
personally, I don't think complacency can be a lifelong state. it's bound to end sooner than one would like and often leaves us worse than where we started before finding complacent ground. but does that make it unworthy of being experienced? I can only answer that for myself, as you for yourself etc etc.
I'm not exactly sure how I'd answer this for myself. part of me is and always has been that artist seeking life experience to create and draw from, and would dive in, because why the hell not? I'm gonna die, and ideally I'll be in control of when and how I die, so .. sticking around to see what one particular Rollercoaster ride has to offer does have some appeal in my mind. but then a much larger fragment of my person knows the experience and its potential positive perceptions must come to a halt eventually, and I know I won't enjoy that and the feelings that might awaken - why bother?
I guess, in trying to look at this contemplation in a way at all 'positive', I'd revisit Camus and absurdism as a whole. (if I've misunderstood philosophical theories, please do let me know, lol.) existence has no meaning outside of what we build for ourselves, but that lack of external acknowledgment/understanding shouldn't be a deterrent to experiencing existence as it reveals itself to each of us.
so, I guess I have no idea either.
specifically thinking about romantic arrangements though, I'm not into that. I'm not aromantic, but I enjoy being single and I feel if I were to want to find/build a relationship I'd need to be in a substantially improved state of being and mind, neither of which are likely or feasible- at least not at this time.
I can see how finding positivity in romance would lead to possible optimism, and maybe I'm just a bitter jaded bitch, but I wouldn't want to open myself up for any further wounds. I definitely would (and have!) get the happy happy joy joy feelings and feel a possibly similar conflict, though. so, my sympathies.

You make excellent points. Rhetoric is good. x3 I intended to pose my question in a pretty pragmatic way; like, the question of whether experiencing a state of complacency is worth it, isn't the Q, but rather, for long is it worth it. But I think we agree that the experience itself does certainly have value. It's just after a while, the absurdism of existence/any experience catches up.

Props to you for wanting to be in a matter state of mind before getting romantically involved. Def agree that's important. i'll probably actually make a thread soon about how my partner is also suicidal and how us being together how we are is........wow. Single life is dope. FWB is dope. Procreating is lame. Romantic partnership where one or more parties is having severe mental problems is harsh. But not impossible. Communication is best.




You mean, why would one want to do something one doesn't want to do? Or why one keeps doing something one doesn't want to do?

Both; either.
I love your whole party/congress way of thinking about this.
Processing these questions with the same framework, the output would be: if my devotion lies in the Quality party, then, if this complacency is characterized by good things in life outweighing bad things in life (since the relationship was started and until now), then yes. Otherwise no.
Using this formula then, well, my complacency I would say isn't 'quality' or 'good life' so falling into "Otherwise no."
It seems I and everyone who replied agree that post-complacency is more suffering. Indeed the best route to take seems to roll with this staying alive as long as it's suitable and not worry about being stuck with it because it will end. While rolling, continue to prepare for ctb, and then when the suffering is back, am able to board in a timely manner without panic.
there is a part of me still concerned about being one of those who stays alive too long and does somehow feel stuck in life, ctb somehow beyond reach, but this life doesn't seem to be headed in that direction hopefully.. shall try very diligently to steer away. complacency feels guilty too but shall roll for now....
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: BandAddict and sourpink

Similar threads

Darkover
Replies
1
Views
91
Offtopic
Forever Sleep
F
Darkover
Replies
0
Views
115
Suicide Discussion
Darkover
Darkover
Darkover
Replies
2
Views
206
Suicide Discussion
ijustwishtodie
ijustwishtodie
Darkover
Replies
10
Views
336
Suicide Discussion
Darkover
Darkover