Do you feel perhaps that your overindulgence in media has painted unrealistic expectations that real people could never live up to?
You strike me as one who has endured heavy trauma from a young age, and thus keeps other people at a distance. I imagine it's difficult for you to trust real people. Fictional characters supercede these issues. Not only does it feel like you more genuinely connect with them, but I'm sure they also feel more interesting than the average person, and more attractive, for various reasons. An impossible standard no real person has ever been able to reach.
You are correct in a manner of speaking; fiction has given me unrealistic standards about life and of people, though perhaps not the traditional standards you may be thinking of.
What does most fiction demand? A narrative, a plot, and a conflict. Certainly there are plenty of examples of fictional stories without any of these things, but that's besides the point. To put it simply, fiction demands that the characters within it interact with one another. When two characters come into conflict and have a misunderstanding. For the sake of the drama, their confrontation unfolds in one way or another, but almost always there does exist a confrontation.
Fiction, by its nature, is an exaggerated portrayal of life, and in the course of its mission tells us several lies: people are attractive, people are charismatic, life is interesting, so on, and so forth. These are the standards you had initially laid out. However, I've found that the biggest inherent lie that is told by fiction in its reflection of reality is the fact that real life is not nearly as interactive.
The vast majority of real people are averse to conflict and misunderstandings to the extreme, opting instead for silence, hollow platitudes, or polite, veiled avoidance, gently steering themselves away until the problem becomes a distant speck on the horizon. Even the mildest of social discomforts is considered an aberration to be excised with inaction serving as the scalpel and apathy as the hand that wields it.
It's an incredible irony, if you think about it; "real life is less interactive than fiction". Particularly if you are someone who enjoys video games, where the emphasis on video games as a medium has always been to try to present people with more and larger interactions in an attempt to reflect on the supposedly free-form nature of reality.
To answer your question more directly, yes, fiction has given me unrealistic expectations that real people--particularly those I'd considered friends or even family--could never live up to. If I commit some social faux pas and accidentally say something crass or tasteless that they find objectionable, I expect people to be invested enough in me as a person to care about my growth and help me correct the behavior by pointing it out. When people commit to being friends with one another, I expect them to willingly participate in the lives of each other--within reason--rather than being so self-absorbed as to wordlessly drift away and break off the entire thing through inaction. I had expected people to want to interact with each other, in the way that a narrative requires its characters to interact with one another.
Fiction has no room for apathy. Real life people are filled with nothing but apathy. That's been my experience.
Ha ha true. There are certain fictional characters that felt like family members. Do you want to name any such characters?
I have a lot of attachment to the Persona series of video games specifically because they foster things like this. The entire main cast of Persona 4 is something that does this well, not just because they're friends with the self-insert main character but because they're friends with each other.