Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):
Ethereum (ETH):
Monero (XMR):
Methodadvice on cutting leg arteries
Thread starterdisabledsuicidegirl
Start date
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
omg no he didn't. please stop @threesummers are you on the telegram group?
god damn I'm sorry but people like you are pissing me off! I clearly chose my own method. This is an open-minded pro-choice advice site, is it not?? It's not like I made a post saying "hey, i wanna kill myself, tell me your methods!" no, it's not like that at all!
furthermore, and this is the last time I'll mention this, but these forums clearly have different labels, one of them is labeled "Methods". so what are we discussing here? We're discussing MY method, a method I ALREADY had thought of before I started posting anything. I just made multiple threads to reach out further and get others insights. My first thread explains my situation fully. Please do not point fingers at these other people.
I'm sorry @x~Sophia~x but I see it differently. I didn't advise the use of severing an artery to commit suicide. What I did was suggest a way that would minimize the risk of infection and nerve damage SHOULD someone attempt by severing an artery.
It's the equivalent of someone saying, "I'm going to ctb by shooting under my chin with a 380." If a person does that, there is a good chance they will live, fuck up their face, and possibly wind up blind. If I tell them, that's a bad idea, you would be better off with a 45 in your mouth, I'm not telling them to kill themself. What I am doing is trying to prevent them from royally fucking up their life.
I'm not getting into a back and forth over this. I am fine with agreeing to disagree.
Reactions:
Nutshell, Kimuraaaa, killedbypsychiatry and 3 others
I'm sorry @x~Sophia~x but I see it differently. I didn't advise the use of severing an artery to commit suicide. What I did was suggest a way that would minimize the risk of infection and nerve damage SHOULD someone attempt by severing an artery.
It's the equivalent of someone saying, "I'm going to ctb by shooting under my chin with a 380." If a person does that, there is a good chance they will live, fuck up their face, and possibly wind up blind. If I tell them, that's a bad idea, you would be better off with a 45 in your mouth, I'm not telling them to kill themself. What I am doing is trying to prevent them from royally fucking up their life.
I'm not getting into a back and forth over this. I am fine with agreeing to disagree.
Nobody is telling op to kill themselves. Nobody is telling op this is how you do it. They are just saying hypothetically this is a possibility. Bad hypothetical possibility but a possible way in theory. Huge difference in terms of "this is how now go do it"
This site is full of theories on how to with nobody telling anyone do it. Just a site full of other's suffering and willing to listen. This is all just hypothetical.
If someone does ctb on their own choosing. That's just it. It was just their own choosing. Nobody on this site bullied, harassed, ordered or blackmailed anyone into doing anything. If an individual does go through with their own plans it's on them not any third party unless they say "I'll join you" to get them to do it but than back out. That's when it's a legal issue.
Because legal argument is "third party only said they would to ease/push suicidal person over the edge to complete an action they were not fully ready to decide on their own yet. And when the third party knew they themselves we're never going to follow through on their own death it becomes a case of manslaughter and or reckless death." Atleast in the US where I'm from.
As of right now we are all talking about theory. Nothing more. Just theory. And if OP goes through with any future plans it is all on them not on the site or any of us who maybe helping explain why the theory doesn't work scientifically.
If we all want to wish them a happy travel it's fine. If we all give advice on not to buy a substance cause it appears sketchy from a distributor it's fine. Because we all are just giving opinion. Same as here. This all just exchange of theories.
Because again if OP does anything to themselves it's not in our control. No more than it's a movie creator/actor/ distributor control if someone sees a film and decides to commit murders based off that film.
Reactions:
disabledsuicidegirl, Drimacus and Nutshell
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.