• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
U

urgent

Why do I have to suffer unbearably! HELP PLEASE!
Dec 6, 2025
374
Someone to fake an abduction,throw me in a car give me a hot shot, head to the bridge wrap me in chains so I'm decomposed when I'm found , they can cremate me and plant some trees with my ashes mixed in. Please God, if you're there make this happen please, I can't handle the brutal unbearable pain non-stop need to end this brutality
 
  • Aww..
Reactions: ctb_warrior, pthnrdnojvsc and sometimelater
S

swan7o7

Member
Apr 15, 2026
38
everyone ignores my posts because they are too lazy to google ingo swann, they think consciousness studies is boring. sigh. i am only seeking other women so maybe thats the issue. not many girls into consciousness on the internet these days? im one, dm me.
 
  • Aww..
Reactions: ctb_warrior
sometimelater

sometimelater

Member
Jul 13, 2026
25
everyone ignores my posts because they are too lazy to google ingo swann, they think consciousness studies is boring. sigh. i am only seeking other women so maybe thats the issue. not many girls into consciousness on the internet these days? im one, dm me.
ingo swann, after i read his wikipedia, appears to be just a crazy scientologist
 
S

swan7o7

Member
Apr 15, 2026
38
ingo swann, after i read his wikipedia, appears to be just a crazy scientologist
well, the u.s government published evidence hes psychic. the entire wikipedia you read is full of evidence. so you must not have really read it. LOL
ingo swann, after i read his wikipedia, appears to be just a crazy scientologist
look up pat price too, both renowned in the field of consciousness in the united states. you have alot of research to do, nothing to do with scientology, AT ALL.
 
D

DeathSweetDeath

Visionary
Nov 12, 2025
2,131
Not such an easy thing, as the person would #1… need to be 100% ready to CTB immediately after disposing of you, and #2… be willing to give up their chance to CTB & go to prison instead if they get caught before they finish disposing of you. It's a pretty big thing to ask of a stranger.
 
sometimelater

sometimelater

Member
Jul 13, 2026
25
well, the u.s government published evidence hes psychic. the entire wikipedia you read is full of evidence. so you must not have really read it. LOL
the stargate record was declassified, it wasnt published. it concluded that the statistical effect across the lab studies looked real and not attributable to chance but hadn't produced any actionable, verifiable intelligence. very far from what you seem to have taken as "the government confirmed he was psychic" which isn't the case

yes i did read it
 
S

swan7o7

Member
Apr 15, 2026
38
the stargate record was declassified, it wasnt published. it concluded that the statistical effect across the lab studies looked real and not attributable to chance but hadn't produced any actionable, verifiable intelligence. very far from what you seem to have taken as "the government confirmed he was psychic" which isn't the case

yes i did read it
Just kidding I didn't read it because it clearly says he was a U.s government psychic I'm a troll
@sometimelater now I can see why you're on this website it's perfect for you because you genuinely have no idea what you're doing in this world
@sometimelater how are you reading a Wikipedia page that literally describes somebody as a government appointed psychic without understanding the fact that they're a psychic??? 🤣
@sometimelater btw, everything about ingo you can find online is not tied to stargate. He was independently researched many times so you can't just say everything is about Stargate good try though.
Stargate and ingo swann are separately studied, haha, you didn't read it. Why lie

@sometimelater keeps misunderstanding the definition of psychic, if you read ingo swanns wiki it says HE was proven by the USA government. The stuff with Scientology… that's another story!
That's not stargate, I just mentioned it as another example, which you mention was proven to be true.
That is not ingo, ingo was already proven as psychic. By the u.s government.

You can see clearly on his wiki that he was proven to be able to remote view objects out of rooms and reliably determine things that he should not have known. He was proven to be a psychic so if you are not able to read a wiki and take the time to sit down and actually read something that's on you.
@sometimelater now I can see why, this website it's perfect for you because you genuinely have no idea what you're doing in this world
@sometimelater how are you reading a Wikipedia page that literally describes somebody as a government appointed psychic without understanding the fact that they're a psychic??? 🤣
@sometimelater btw, everything about ingo you can find online is not tied to stargate. He was independently researched many times so you can't just say everything is about Stargate good try though.
ATTENTION EVERYONE, @sometimelater IS MAKING A INTENTIONAL EFFORT TO SUPRESS THIS POST, when it takes one google search TO SEE A WIKIPEDIA LINK, that explains why he was a psychic. I will not be engaging him any longer do not worry. He may as well not even speak the English language, U. S. A GOVERNMENT PSYCHIC means nothing to him
the stargate record was declassified, it wasnt published. it concluded that the statistical effect across the lab studies looked real and not attributable to chance but hadn't produced any actionable, verifiable intelligence. very far from what you seem to have taken as "the government confirmed he was psychic" which isn't the case

yes i did read it
Somehow, you are taking the fact that Stargate was declassified to mean that Ingo Swann was never a US government appointed psychic when it takes one Google search to confirm that he was am I reading that correctly?
And now here comes the insults because he's so scared to accept the truth
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: ctb_warrior
ctb_warrior

ctb_warrior

I wish to CTB asap
Feb 11, 2024
1,173
@sometimelater now I can see why you're on this website it's perfect for you because you genuinely have no idea what you're doing in this world
@sometimelater how are you reading a Wikipedia page that literally describes somebody as a government appointed psychic without understanding the fact that they're a psychic??? 🤣
@sometimelater btw, everything about ingo you can find online is not tied to stargate. He was independently researched many times so you can't just say everything is about Stargate good try though.

ATTENTION EVERYONE, @sometimelater IS MAKING A INTENTIONAL EFFORT TO SUPRESS THIS POST, when it takes one google search TO SEE A WIKIPEDIA LINK, that explains why he was a psychic. I will not be engaging him any longer do not worry. He may as well not even speak the English language, U. S. A GOVERNMENT PSYCHIC means nothing to him

Somehow, you are taking the fact that Stargate was declassified to mean that Ingo Swann was never a US government appointed psychic when it takes one Google search to confirm that he was am I reading that correctly?
And now here comes the insults because he's so scared to accept the truth
Damn this topic is so interesting . Yesterday itself i posted a comment in another thread about US defense working on remote viewing.
Its going to be an interesting read.
I did my own experiment on remote viewing. I made my friend from another country remote view my room and she described my room with 100% accuracy, even she has never seen my room even in photos.
Someone to fake an abduction,throw me in a car give me a hot shot, head to the bridge wrap me in chains so I'm decomposed when I'm found , they can cremate me and plant some trees with my ashes mixed in. Please God, if you're there make this happen please, I can't handle the brutal unbearable pain non-stop need to end this brutality
I'm sorry to say that even if God is there, its an impossible case unless you are very rich and live in a crime prone area where someone wants to take your wealth by killing you.

I hope and wish that you get relief from your pain by whatever means possible.🫂❤️
everyone ignores my posts because they are too lazy to google ingo swann, they think consciousness studies is boring. sigh. i am only seeking other women so maybe thats the issue. not many girls into consciousness on the internet these days? im one, dm me.
I googled ingo swann, it revealed interesting things.. Thanks for sharing it.
Btw, Jose Silva also did research on mind power and wrote a book, Silva Mind Control. It basically says that in the alpha brainwave state, one can see diseases in others and heal them, remote view distant places and objects.
There is a MindValley course on Silva Ultramind. It may be available for free on the internet somewhere. I saw a free link long ago.
Also there are many books on this. Go through it if you would like to explore
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DeathSweetDeath
sometimelater

sometimelater

Member
Jul 13, 2026
25
ATTENTION EVERYONE, @sometimelater IS MAKING A INTENTIONAL EFFORT TO SUPRESS THIS POST
what the hell are you even talking about how am i suppressing anything im not even a admin or moderator on this forum. you're a schizophrenic, guy. you're talking nonsense.

i didn't say he wasn't a "GOVERNMENT APPOINTED PSYCHIC", which is a very loose way to describe what happened anyways. the CIA contracted him because they were interested in him but the report that you keep going crazy about literally states it produced no actionable intelligence
you keep telling me to read the wikipedia, so here's the first sentence of it:
"Ingo Douglass Swann (September 14, 1933 – January 31, 2013) was an American psychic, artist, and author, whose claims of clairvoyance were investigated as a part of the Central Intelligence Agency's Stargate Project."

"investigated" does not mean the same as "proven" and no amount of raving in all caps will change that. the same page says his abilities were tested by puthoff and targ "with CIA funding", meaning he was a paid research subject at SRI. that's what "government appointed psychic" actually means according to you. nobody appointed him to anything.

and was the research worth shit? not according to wikipedia which you love so much as a source of truth regarding conspiracy theories (for reasons beyond me). from the stargate wikipedia:
"According to the AIR review, no remote viewing report ever provided actionable information for any intelligence operation."
 
Last edited:
S

swan7o7

Member
Apr 15, 2026
38
what the hell are you even talking about how am i suppressing anything im not even a admin or moderator on this forum. you're a schizophrenic, guy. you're talking nonsense.

i didn't say he wasn't a "GOVERNMENT APPOINTED PSYCHIC", which is a very loose way to describe what happened anyways. the CIA contracted him because they were interested in him but the report that you keep going crazy about literally states it produced no actionable intelligence
you keep telling me to read the wikipedia, so here's the first sentence of it:
"Ingo Douglass Swann (September 14, 1933 – January 31, 2013) was an American psychic, artist, and author, whose claims of clairvoyance were investigated as a part of the Central Intelligence Agency's Stargate Project."

"investigated" does not mean the same as "proven" and no amount of raving in all caps will change that. the same page says his abilities were tested by puthoff and targ "with CIA funding", meaning he was a paid research subject at SRI. that's what "government appointed psychic" actually means according to you. nobody appointed him to anything.

and was the research worth shit? not according to wikipedia which you love so much as a source of truth regarding conspiracy theories (for reasons beyond me). from the stargate wikipedia:
"According to the AIR review, no remote viewing report ever provided actionable information for any intelligence operation."
He was not investigated as a psychic. He was proven so I don't have to rave about it. You can read the Wikipedia yourself. Is that too scary for you? Are you brave enough to read a Wikipedia article?
what the hell are you even talking about how am i suppressing anything im not even a admin or moderator on this forum. you're a schizophrenic, guy. you're talking nonsense.

i didn't say he wasn't a "GOVERNMENT APPOINTED PSYCHIC", which is a very loose way to describe what happened anyways. the CIA contracted him because they were interested in him but the report that you keep going crazy about literally states it produced no actionable intelligence
you keep telling me to read the wikipedia, so here's the first sentence of it:
"Ingo Douglass Swann (September 14, 1933 – January 31, 2013) was an American psychic, artist, and author, whose claims of clairvoyance were investigated as a part of the Central Intelligence Agency's Stargate Project."

"investigated" does not mean the same as "proven" and no amount of raving in all caps will change that. the same page says his abilities were tested by puthoff and targ "with CIA funding", meaning he was a paid research subject at SRI. that's what "government appointed psychic" actually means according to you. nobody appointed him to anything.

and was the research worth shit? not according to wikipedia which you love so much as a source of truth regarding conspiracy theories (for reasons beyond me). from the stargate wikipedia:
"According to the AIR review, no remote viewing report ever provided actionable information for any intelligence operation."
@sometimelater IS STILL INTENTIONALLY SUPRESSING THIS POST. When one read of the Wikipedia and several other government owned websites prove otherwise. The ridiculously hilarious thing is, ALL CAPS HELP YOU READ IT EASIER!!
what the hell are you even talking about how am i suppressing anything im not even a admin or moderator on this forum. you're a schizophrenic, guy. you're talking nonsense.

i didn't say he wasn't a "GOVERNMENT APPOINTED PSYCHIC", which is a very loose way to describe what happened anyways. the CIA contracted him because they were interested in him but the report that you keep going crazy about literally states it produced no actionable intelligence
you keep telling me to read the wikipedia, so here's the first sentence of it:
"Ingo Douglass Swann (September 14, 1933 – January 31, 2013) was an American psychic, artist, and author, whose claims of clairvoyance were investigated as a part of the Central Intelligence Agency's Stargate Project."

"investigated" does not mean the same as "proven" and no amount of raving in all caps will change that. the same page says his abilities were tested by puthoff and targ "with CIA funding", meaning he was a paid research subject at SRI. that's what "government appointed psychic" actually means according to you. nobody appointed him to anything.

and was the research worth shit? not according to wikipedia which you love so much as a source of truth regarding conspiracy theories (for reasons beyond me). from the stargate wikipedia:
"According to the AIR review, no remote viewing report ever provided actionable information for any intelligence operation."
I understand where you're coming from and trust me. This is the main misunderstanding with most people.

He was proven as a remote viewer
That's the entire point of why they had to study him in the first place and why he got paid
He had proven results in remote viewing and precognition, however
However
There is a caveat, And a but,
what the hell are you even talking about how am i suppressing anything im not even a admin or moderator on this forum. you're a schizophrenic, guy. you're talking nonsense.

i didn't say he wasn't a "GOVERNMENT APPOINTED PSYCHIC", which is a very loose way to describe what happened anyways. the CIA contracted him because they were interested in him but the report that you keep going crazy about literally states it produced no actionable intelligence
you keep telling me to read the wikipedia, so here's the first sentence of it:
"Ingo Douglass Swann (September 14, 1933 – January 31, 2013) was an American psychic, artist, and author, whose claims of clairvoyance were investigated as a part of the Central Intelligence Agency's Stargate Project."

"investigated" does not mean the same as "proven" and no amount of raving in all caps will change that. the same page says his abilities were tested by puthoff and targ "with CIA funding", meaning he was a paid research subject at SRI. that's what "government appointed psychic" actually means according to you. nobody appointed him to anything.

and was the research worth shit? not according to wikipedia which you love so much as a source of truth regarding conspiracy theories (for reasons beyond me). from the stargate wikipedia:
"According to the AIR review, no remote viewing report ever provided actionable information for any intelligence operation."
@sometinelater
You are saying that you think they only contacted him and then nothing else else came from that then that means you don't read the Wikipedia
He was proven as a remote viewer that's why he's famous
I'll say it one more time for you
HE WAS PROVEN AS A REMOTE VIEWER THAT'S WHY HE'S FAMOUS!!!

BUT

the entire subject of remote viewing itself is recognized as the pseudoscience you are correct that no one is ever seen as a perfect remote viewer.
what the hell are you even talking about how am i suppressing anything im not even a admin or moderator on this forum. you're a schizophrenic, guy. you're talking nonsense.

i didn't say he wasn't a "GOVERNMENT APPOINTED PSYCHIC", which is a very loose way to describe what happened anyways. the CIA contracted him because they were interested in him but the report that you keep going crazy about literally states it produced no actionable intelligence
you keep telling me to read the wikipedia, so here's the first sentence of it:
"Ingo Douglass Swann (September 14, 1933 – January 31, 2013) was an American psychic, artist, and author, whose claims of clairvoyance were investigated as a part of the Central Intelligence Agency's Stargate Project."

"investigated" does not mean the same as "proven" and no amount of raving in all caps will change that. the same page says his abilities were tested by puthoff and targ "with CIA funding", meaning he was a paid research subject at SRI. that's what "government appointed psychic" actually means according to you. nobody appointed him to anything.

and was the research worth shit? not according to wikipedia which you love so much as a source of truth regarding conspiracy theories (for reasons beyond me). from the stargate wikipedia:
"According to the AIR review, no remote viewing report ever provided actionable information for any intelligence operation."
It's completely OK to not fully understand something

IT IS NOT OK TO COME ONTO A DISCUSSION WHERE THERE IS PEOPLE WHO FULLY UNDERSTAND IT AND DIMINISH THAT UNDERSTANDING WITH YOUR OWN IGNORANCE
Remote viewing as an entire category is seen as a pseudoscience that is entirely correct you have stated entirely provable points. They are true.

But what if you continue to read down that article on Wikipedia what if you dare to read more than a few sentences and you find out not only was he proven as but he was proven of successful precognition

Those things do not disprove your point,

We actually might agree if you would just listen to me and understand this for a second
Pseudoscience as a whole is unrecognized as an exact science you were correct
He was not investigated as a psychic. He was proven so I don't have to rave about it. You can read the Wikipedia yourself. Is that too scary for you? Are you brave enough to read a Wikipedia article?

@sometimelater IS STILL INTENTIONALLY SUPRESSING THIS POST. When one read of the Wikipedia and several other government owned websites prove otherwise. The ridiculously hilarious thing is, ALL CAPS HELP YOU READ IT EASIER!!

I understand where you're coming from and trust me. This is the main misunderstanding with most people.

He was proven as a remote viewer
That's the entire point of why they had to study him in the first place and why he got paid
He had proven results in remote viewing and precognition, however
However
There is a caveat, And a but,

@sometinelater
You are saying that you think they only contacted him and then nothing else else came from that then that means you don't read the Wikipedia
He was proven as a remote viewer that's why he's famous
I'll say it one more time for you
HE WAS PROVEN AS A REMOTE VIEWER THAT'S WHY HE'S FAMOUS!!!

BUT

the entire subject of remote viewing itself is recognized as the pseudoscience you are correct that no one is ever seen as a perfect remote viewer.

It's completely OK to not fully understand something

IT IS NOT OK TO COME ONTO A DISCUSSION WHERE THERE IS PEOPLE WHO FULLY UNDERSTAND IT AND DIMINISH THAT UNDERSTANDING WITH YOUR OWN IGNORANCE
Remote viewing as an entire category is seen as a pseudoscience that is entirely correct you have stated entirely provable points. They are true.

But what if you continue to read down that article on Wikipedia what if you dare to read more than a few sentences and you find out not only was he proven as but he was proven of successful precognition

Those things do not disprove your point,

We actually might agree if you would just listen to me and understand this for a second
Pseudoscience as a whole is unrecognized as an exact science you were correct
You people are the reason why this type of discussion is very hard to get into and that's all I'm gonna say I'm gonna leave it at that
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

dissociatedmess
Replies
0
Views
212
Suicide Discussion
dissociatedmess
dissociatedmess
anopenwound
Replies
1
Views
332
Suicide Discussion
kunikuzushi
kunikuzushi
Lost in a Dream
Replies
44
Views
3K
Offtopic
Lost in a Dream
Lost in a Dream
enne
Replies
2
Views
607
Suicide Discussion
Cherry Crumpet
Cherry Crumpet