Speaking as an older member, the broader issue we need to be aware of is internal division. There are certain topics which are inherently incendiary to the community. We need to be mindful of them. Examples:
* Overburdened parents in distress vs. childless people who have been traumatised by negligent parenting. The keyword 'natalist' is the grenade to initiate bitter infighting.
* People who are suicidal amidst unbearable emotions and situations vs. people who will mechanically repeat mantras about life being bad. The trigger words to initiate war between these groups might be 'pro-life' (used in this context as a derogatory term for a distressed suicidal person fighting to survive). And yes, there is tremendous overlap between 'Suicide Discussion' and 'Recovery'.
* Old vs. young people with wildly varying views (on average) on life. Various other identity politics issues, e.g. posts with veiled misogynistic content. Transphobic insensitivity with the obligatory claim of 'free-speech' victimhood. Theist vs. atheist. There are various triggers but shouldn't be hard to spot. Not to be confused with respectful dialogue on difficult topics.
Beware of people using 'divide and rule' to feed off these sorts of conflicts to develop a following. Also beware of people whose mental health makes them unable to feel genuine empathy for others. And further to that, beware of well-intentioned discussions and opinions expressed around these hot topics that can easily turn ugly.
Since we are a community, we cannot attack each other without attacking ourselves. We have an important niche, yet many foes on the outside who may well be taking note of our weaknesses.