Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):
Ethereum (ETH):
Monero (XMR):
What MBTI type are you?
Thread starterGeneral Alek
Start date
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Most responses will similarly be introverted intuitives, though it's unclear whether that's because INXXs are more likely to know their type/be interested in MBTI, or because they're overrrepresented on the site.
This has been repeated so often that it's almost a cliché at this point. At the end of the day, all personality typing systems have the same flaw: they're artificially constructed categorizations based on self-reported data.
OCEAN is also "pseudoscientific" in that sense; who's to say that the right way to boil down someone's character is to measure openness, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism? What do these terms even mean? What questions could you ask to accurately assess them? Not to mention that there are hundreds of other terms that could've been chosen, those precise five are somewhat arbitrary. People will also get different results everytime they take a Big Five test, because that's just the nature of asking people questions about themselves.
None of that means that it can't be a useful tool. OCEAN tends to be good for population-level studies and has the advantage of placing people on a spectrum, instead of into discrete boxes, just like how MBTI tends to be good for understanding how people make decisions, and the Enneagram tends to be good for understanding what motivates people. The question isn't whether one system is "better" or "more scientific," it's "Which screwdriver do I need for this screw?"
This has been repeated so often that it's almost a cliché at this point. At the end of the day, all personality typing systems have the same flaw: they're artificially constructed categorizations based on self-reported data.
OCEAN is also "pseudoscientific" in that sense; who's to say that the right way to boil down someone's character is to measure openness, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism? What do these terms even mean? What questions could you ask to accurately assess them? Not to mention that there are hundreds of other terms that could've been chosen, those precise five are somewhat arbitrary. People will also get different results everytime they take a Big Five test, because that's just the nature of asking people questions about themselves.
None of that means that it can't be a useful tool. OCEAN tends to be good for population-level studies and has the advantage of placing people on a spectrum, instead of into discrete boxes, just like how MBTI tends to be good for understanding how people make decisions, and the Enneagram tends to be good for understanding what motivates people. The question isn't whether one system is "better" or "more scientific," it's "Which screwdriver do I need for this screw?"
I think for both MBTI and OCEAN, Human Resources departments like to use them both because they're fairly useful for categorizing employees at least. I took the OCEAN for my HR class after all.
I think for both MBTI and OCEAN, Human Resources departments like to use them both because they're fairly useful for categorizing employees at least. I took the OCEAN for my HR class after all.
Yeah, I actually think it's unfortunate how typing systems have come to be used by HR departments for hiring purposes, because then they're being used for predictive purposes in what I would say is a discriminatory fashion. Divination is not, in fact, one of the legitimate uses of any personality typing system.
INFJ which is apparently the rarest one, but I always see a bajillion people online claiming to be this one so it doesn't seem like it's actually rare.
INFJ which is apparently the rarest one, but I always see a bajillion people online claiming to be this one so it doesn't seem like it's actually rare.
The (test-retest) reliability of the MBTI is low, so it's not surprising that you get a different result when retesting. I agree that your INFP result isn't the reason why you're likeable.
I've always had an interest in personality tests and the like. I'm saying when I was in middle school, high school several times, undergrad several times, and the beginning of law school, I'd always get INTJ. I changed a good bit from my early-mid 20's to present (I think for the better) and I will now almost always get INFP, and if I get something else it's never INTJ.
Really? I thought the impression most have is that we're too emotional and overthink things. It's the most emotionally driven/least logical out of all the types, isn't it?
Really? I thought the impression most have is that we're too emotional and overthink things. It's the most emotionally driven/least logical out of all the types, isn't it?
Well, I guess it's somewhat subjective. I'm INTP and I like people who are more intuitive and sense-driven, without being annoying extroverts; I feel like I can connect with them the best.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.