Before we talk about Ingmar Bergman's great film, we need to clear some space. Because today's conversation is not for those who whine about everyday troubles, and here's why.
There is suffering that makes a person human. And then there's the pathetic rummaging through one's own complexes, unworthy even of a fleeting glance - as Dante said, they are not worth words: a glance, and then move on. I'll be blunt - I have no sympathy here for people who suffer from physical limitations, lost or unrequited love, the loss of loved ones, social phobia, or any other form of inadequacy. All of this is, of course, unpleasant. But it's trivial. It's garbage. Such suffering requires no courage - only self-pity, and pity is the lot of the weak. Weakness is always deficient, and the deficient has no right to lay claim to the sublime.
Not every suffering is worthy. Yes, exactly - there are categories, classifications, properties. Aristotle gives an affirmative answer as well - this lends credibility to my own thoughts. I am convinced there is no subjectivity or shades of gray here. There is a clear list of what you must and are obligated to love, what to avoid, and what to strive for. You have no choice. Anyone who does not comply will end up on the list of spiritual proscriptions and moral freaks - like those drowning in the Styx in Delacroix's painting.
When I read the complaints of a transgender person on our beloved SaSu, I, as Kierkegaard said, "laugh heartily." But it would be funny if it weren't so sad.
Indeed, Dostoevsky's words are just: he said there have been hundreds of suicides, but not a single genuine, Faustian one.
No suffering deserves respect if it is not connected to existential problems of existence and remains alien to philosophy.
If you do not labor in the field of philosophers, then you are cattle in a pen - as Shakespeare said: such a man is something like an animal. And Aristotle is right when he literally states that the lives of people who do not strive for knowledge should not be taken seriously. Nicomachean Ethics
But enough of the prelude. Let us move on to what I sat down to write this post for.
Today I want to introduce you to one of the greatest films of all time - The Seventh Seal by Ingmar Bergman, 1957.
It tells the story of a medieval knight wandering through a land devastated by the plague. He encounters Death and, trying to postpone the inevitable, challenges Him to a game of chess in exchange for more time- as long as he hasn't lost, he remains alive.
He uses this time for one final attempt to get an answer to the ultimate question of existence: what is the meaning of all this? And does God exist?
But of course, the answer he seeks is never found. In my opinion, this film is the most valuable in terms of its depth of meaning in the history of cinema.
The horror that Bergman conveys through the hero's confession is what the philosopher Albert Camus called the Absurd.
According to Camus, the solution is to accept our helplessness and the emptiness of life, but without despair. One who manages to achieve this, he calls an absurd man. Such a person would stop searching for meaning and simply enjoy life amidst the absurd -freely deciding how to live, creating their own small meaning.
But how- looking at all this nightmare, the horrors of life, and its meaninglessness - how can we not succumb to despair? One answer is to look at life through the lens of humor.
But what if Camus is wrong? What if God or meaning does exist after all? According to Kierkegaard, this question is a trap- reason will never lead us to an answer; there is always doubt and the possibility of error. Instead, he advises making a leap of faith - deciding that God exists, or deciding that God does not exist, and living accordingly.
So, when the final hour strikes - there is nothing left to learn, no great revelation, only the simple end of life. And so everything ends, and no mystery is solved — because there never was one.
In conclusion, I will offer another paraphrase of Kierkegaard, urging one to take the path of knowledge, bringing you back, dear reader, to my introduction: We do not know where we are going or why. But while we are on the way, we might as well get the most out of our journey.