Interesting question, maybe the most interesting of all! Since you have no posting history, I'd have to make the most general possible answer... would take me a while. Please feel free to leave any details about your situation
But very briefly, there's two components: knowing what's
good, and
effective action to achieve the good. Two separate
mental frameworks
Each
group-mind may have a
mythology/propaganda of what's
"good" — but humans have an inner moral sense & rationality that serves as a compass, that helps you see through many illusions
It's not enough to know what's good. Many moral philosophers are nevertheless depraved cowards.
Effective action is necessary. Not just action, but effective action — because ineffective action may cause the opposite of good
I suspect that a framework of effective action is more complex (or counter-intuitive?) than a framework of what's good. Because:
- good: is mainly a concept on the social level, and any levels above (such as psychological & spiritual levels)
- effective action: can take place an all levels — including on material levels. (Which are below the social level. Like physics, chemistry & biology. Where entities generally lack consciousness & intention)
(Here's
videos explaining more about these levels of reality, and
a book)