I do wonder if the cultural difference between the big, brash, sensationalist America and the calm, quiet, understated British behaviours cause a difference in:
A) How people explain their experiences
B) How patients are treated
C) How patients treat each other.
I always like this story to explain the difference between how the British and American's express themselves.
I try to be as clear as possible about my experiences accordingly. I can go into further detail about what I specifically found to be condescending, but in summary the techniques were a psychiatric triage in the same manner as American crisis hotlines: the goal is to minimize resources spent on patients having temporary emotional crises, and the techniques used were not effective on the chronically depressed and suicidal.
Some examples include:
-Demonstrating and explaining Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs.
-A handout of a survey conducted on Harvard graduates that said life was worth living.
-"Would you rather"-style questions framed to give a desired response from the patients and keep an eye on those who did not provide the desired response.
Limited art therapy in the form of coloring books.
-A single meditation session, meant to occur twice weekly. The second one was canceled without notice during my stay.
-Worksheets introducing coping mechanisms.
The overall effect was a focus on people in short-term crisis and with limited education. It was not effective on patients who were more familiar with being in the hospital, who treated it as routine, or with patients more familiar with the "meta" of therapy and counseling techniques, as I and a couple of other patients were. I expect they would not be effective with many regular posters on this forum.
There was a PICU for high risk patients, but a temporary overnight stay on my first day seemed to indicate it was for people in deep dissociative and violent states who couldn't control their actions instead of a place for people to receive sustained counseling when the basics proved ineffective.
The most understated way I can frame this is that while I wasn't abused, the experience was an inconvenient and ineffective use of my time given my problems. I hold most of my anger towards the evaluating psychiatrist who recommended I be sent to longer-term care after my 72-hour hold, and towards my psychiatrist at the main facility who seems to, in hindsight, have purposefully put me on a prescription with severe and swift withdrawal symptoms to ensure I would not stop taking them once I was out of their care. I therefore can't recommend the experience to others, and it's why I linked the article I did which tries to recommend outpatient therapy.