noSuffering
May the Force be with Israel
- May 7, 2023
- 126
Hei. I need your help to formulate what can be learned from the following error:
Today I was training on the sports ground and saw a woman, she was doing a warm-up before training. Any workout begins with a warm-up and everyone's warm-ups are more or less similar, but this woman just does the warm-up very carefully, diligently and longer, much better than I do the warm-up. Her warm-up is simply at the level of top sports. But after the warm-up, I start training on the horizontal bars, or running, or practicing kung fu complexes or something else training. I think about this woman who puts a lot of effort and time into warming up, does it very well, but never starts training. One would think that it doesn't matter what you do, it's important how you do it, but for a couple of years since I sometimes watch this woman on the sports ground, she has remained a ugly fatass.
Today I watched, and then read for the second time, the lecture by mathematician Richard Hamming "You and Your Research" where he gave an example with a drunken sailor, each step of which is random, but in general his distance from the starting point is the square root of the number of steps. But if a drunken sailor vaguely sees a beautiful woman, his drunken gait already acquires direction and he, albeit with random delays, reaches this beautiful woman. In this example, a thorough warm-up without actually training is the inversion of the drunken sailor example. When each individual step is not drunk, but perfected, but since there is no goal (training), these perfected steps do not produce results.
I tried to formulate what can be learned, but I think it can be formulated better.
Today I was training on the sports ground and saw a woman, she was doing a warm-up before training. Any workout begins with a warm-up and everyone's warm-ups are more or less similar, but this woman just does the warm-up very carefully, diligently and longer, much better than I do the warm-up. Her warm-up is simply at the level of top sports. But after the warm-up, I start training on the horizontal bars, or running, or practicing kung fu complexes or something else training. I think about this woman who puts a lot of effort and time into warming up, does it very well, but never starts training. One would think that it doesn't matter what you do, it's important how you do it, but for a couple of years since I sometimes watch this woman on the sports ground, she has remained a ugly fatass.
Today I watched, and then read for the second time, the lecture by mathematician Richard Hamming "You and Your Research" where he gave an example with a drunken sailor, each step of which is random, but in general his distance from the starting point is the square root of the number of steps. But if a drunken sailor vaguely sees a beautiful woman, his drunken gait already acquires direction and he, albeit with random delays, reaches this beautiful woman. In this example, a thorough warm-up without actually training is the inversion of the drunken sailor example. When each individual step is not drunk, but perfected, but since there is no goal (training), these perfected steps do not produce results.
I tried to formulate what can be learned, but I think it can be formulated better.
Last edited:
) like me.
