
MountainMonkey
Student
- Jun 17, 2022
- 138
UK users: Due to a formal investigation into this site by Ofcom under the UK Online Safety Act 2023, we strongly recommend using a trusted, no-logs VPN. This will help protect your privacy, bypass censorship, and maintain secure access to the site. Read the full VPN guide here.
Today, OFCOM launched an official investigation into Sanctioned Suicide under the UK’s Online Safety Act. This has already made headlines across the UK.
This is a clear and unprecedented overreach by a foreign regulator against a U.S.-based platform. We reject this interference and will be defending the site’s existence and mission.
In addition to our public response, we are currently seeking legal representation to ensure the best possible defense in this matter. If you are a lawyer or know of one who may be able to assist, please contact us at [email protected].
Read our statement here:
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Of course! Talking specifically about abortion, usually, when people categorize themselves as "pro-choice" it means they are in favor of the act. They believe the choice of ending the life of this human being should lie solely in the hands of the woman.I've searched the net about pro-choice and pro-life but I just don't understand the definitions. When you wrote it in your comment, what did you mean? is it a phrase you use as if you were saying the opposite of what you think in humor? (I have to say these phrases are funny, like the comment you made about raisins and grapes).
I mean, I didn't understand you, I'm sorry. Can you tell me better, please?
//
He fet cerca a la xarxa sobre els pro-elecció i els pro-vida però no acabo d'entendre pas les definicions. Quan ho has escrit en el teu comentari, que has volgut dir? és una frase d'aquelles que uses com si diguessis el contrari del que penses en clau d'humor? (he de dir que aquestes frases són divertides, com el comentari que vas fer de les panses i el raïm).
És a dir, que no t'he entés, ho sento. M'ho expliques millor, si us plau?
I think I have understood it. I do not delegate my choice to someone else but I continue to defend as my own this decision and this makes me really, involuntarily this yesOf course! Talking specifically about abortion, usually, when people categorize themselves as "pro-choice" it means they are in favor of the act. They believe the choice of ending the life of this human being should lie solely in the hands of the woman.
I completely agree when you said that: " only you shouyld be able to decide when to end your life." That's why I said you're the real pro-choice.
Did I explain well enough? Please tell me if I did not.![]()
I'm a reactionary (not a conservative since there's nothing to conserve) that despises religions and tradition but no more than modern culture.
I believe in eugenics as a viable pathway to rapid human progress (in a materialistic sense), but a sofocratic democracy where your voting power was defined by a rigorous examination would have the same effects over time.
A realistic and humane way to implement eugenics would be to only let people physically and mentally sound to procreate, decreasing suffering, bad parenting and the genes of suffering. I'm a partial antinatalist, only a few people should be born, those with the optimal environment.
Basically a political worldview based on efficiency (drastic solutions, quick results) over emotions.
But then I also have an spiritual side that probably is exactly the opposite of the above, so some kind of mystical world government that preached pacifism, monism, meditation, accepting others as part of yourself, accepting that we are all One, exploring our psyche, that would work for me too. Both of these timelines would be much more interesting than this flaccid dystopia.
I couldn't care less about the economic part of how we organize our society, I've always cared more about ideals and culture than specifics. But it's true that is very interesting to discover how much you want the government to impose things to the population. This was revealed as very relevant during the plandemic. People have been softened up to accept incredible levels of coercion and interventionism. Some of my ideas are authoritarian but freedom has it's benefits too. On the Internet I'm more of a free speech guy so I might be less authoritarian on the whole. But during an actual pandemic I would accept draconian rule, so I also believe in coercion and a big state when needed.
Eugenics or an spiritually-oriented society are the best suggestions I can come up with, sadly. I understand that letting the worst people procreate or indulging in angst-inducing materialism are better options.Reading material on reactionaryism? I'm target demographic for the wrong side of the eugenics you know, so I doubt I wouldn't be put off by books on the process. I also suspect anything labeled reactionary would be mistakenly either called far-right, conservative, ultraconservative or all three, so I guess you can make better suggestions given you've been consistent on politics from what is visible.
AQnybody who wants a career in politics should be permanently barred from any such bid.
Same here. I went through the same process. Similarly with religion too. Christian, Mormon, Atheist, and SpiritualWithin 5 years, I went from dem -> conservative -> libertarian -> anarchist
View attachment 93333
It's been wild.
This feels like the only honest post here lol. Honestly, whether people realize it or not, I feel like we're all contrarians in denial. We just like to pretend we're not and feel smart representing this or that belief like it says something deep. Nah, you just like distinguishing yourself from other people so you can feel like you're above them. At least own it and be a universal contrarian like this guy.Contrarian. Whichever group I'm predominantly around, I end up finding ways to oppose them and fixating on that.
Capitalism has always been what uplifts the middle class and brings about prosperity and a decent quality of life. It also supports and drives innovation via competition. In the US, corporations have twisted and corrupted the meaning of capitalism to the point where a large portion of the young population truly believes that socialism and communism is the answer. The reality is the corporations have too much power and what we are seeing is "crony capitalism". It is only a matter of time before corporations have as much power as the government and start to set laws. In Nevada, a bill was introduced to allow tech companies to create governments. Also look no further than twitter and meta. They control the news we hear or read. Imagine they were given the green light to create governments. Oh, wait a minute. They practically have.I'm a conservative Republican capitalist.
Center slightly leaning right due to traditionalism.In the political spectrum you're more inclined to the left, center, or right? What form of government do you think is/would be the best? What type of economical system do you think is/would be the most effective? Would you consider yourself to be a communist, feminist, anarchist, conservative, liberal or whatever it may be?