
motel rooms
Survivor of incest. Gay. Please don't PM me.
- Apr 13, 2021
- 7,081
I hope they let the nuns examine them tooThey need to examine every lesbian porn video available

UK users: Due to a formal investigation into this site by Ofcom under the UK Online Safety Act 2023, we strongly recommend using a trusted, no-logs VPN. This will help protect your privacy, bypass censorship, and maintain secure access to the site. Read the full VPN guide here.
Today, OFCOM launched an official investigation into Sanctioned Suicide under the UK’s Online Safety Act. This has already made headlines across the UK.
This is a clear and unprecedented overreach by a foreign regulator against a U.S.-based platform. We reject this interference and will be defending the site’s existence and mission.
In addition to our public response, we are currently seeking legal representation to ensure the best possible defense in this matter. If you are a lawyer or know of one who may be able to assist, please contact us at [email protected].
Read our statement here:
Donate via cryptocurrency:
I hope they let the nuns examine them tooThey need to examine every lesbian porn video available
I'm not happy, I'm just saying I've had happy moments, and you must agree that life isn't a universally unhappy experience for EVERYONE, some people get lucky and are happy all or most of the time.Well if youre happy in life you wouldnt be in a depression suicidal forum right..
Yeah i think if one can guarantee a great life full of satisfying experiences and low pain with a happy ending. Its ok to procreate. But who can guarantee that?
Let alone if happy ending exist? Since everybody has to experience dying and the body deteriorating.
Have you seen Animalplanet and such? How the animal eating happily then after a while they get eaten screaming in agony.
is the joy of eating worth the pain?
Also heres a article about a prince being asked at the end of the life if hes truely happy when he had experience joy of life. And he said no. And said
"O man! place not thy confidence in this present world!"
Also a science, psychology that human actually not meant to be happy but to survive. Which is why you cant be fully satisfied
![]()
Humans aren’t designed to be happy – so stop trying
Happiness is a human construct, an abstract idea with no biological basis. But this is something to be happy about.theconversation.com
Because even when all our material and biological needs are satisfied, a state of sustained happiness will still remain a theoretical and elusive goal.
Happiness is a human construct, an abstract idea with no equivalent in actual human experience. Positive and negative affects do reside in the brain, but sustained happiness has no biological basis.
The fact that evolution has prioritised the development of a big frontal lobe in our brain (which gives us excellent executive and analytical abilities) over a natural ability to be happy, tells us a lot about nature's priorities.
I agree. How I said it is misleading probably. I don't mean it's impossible to be angry or even that one shouldn't be angry; of course some people are angry, and I find myself slipping back into resentment for my parents sometimes. To put it more clearly, acknowledging the lack of free will often helps reduce any anger I would otherwise have for them.If you are, you can. And whether or not you are is pre-determined.
A disgusting part of nature will redesign disgusting nature so that it stops being disgusting?If anything, by eliminating ourselves we eliminate the only chance to rectify the horrors of nature. It's possible (imo likely) that we will become intelligent enough to redesign nature so that it isn't disgusting like it currently is.
Could you explain how it's flawed? The only options there are for any decision a person makes, is that either it is made for reasons (e.g. bad upbringing, brain tumour, brain structure etc) or for no reason at all (in other words it's a brute fact - e.g. Mark is just a rapist for no prior reasons). It depends how you want to define "free", but in my book, neither of those options grant any kind of freedom. If you subscribe to the idea of libertarian free will, essentially you are saying that all decisions are brute facts (e.g. I chose chocolate ice cream just because). Where's the freedom in that? You can't even explain why you chose chocolate over vanilla, it's just a brute fact of the universe.Um..I am confused by your response..
I said "consolation prize", that means something far different than simply calling access to euthanasia or any suicide a "prize".
A consolation prize is what you get even when you lost the race, a small favor, and my point was that to never have begun the hellish race to begin with would be preferable to going through with it and suffering, just to lose and get a damn consolation, like "well here, it's the least we can do, it won't erase all the trauma and pain you've endured, but at least you can end it now."
It is kind of shitty when you think about it,
that's the bare minimum and sort of a slap in the face, but we are still begging for it because we know that's the best we are going to get and we are desperate to put a stop to the madness.
It's our right, after all.
I am simply saying that to have never been born is superior to having lived a life of suffering, or risking such.
Because death isn't even enough, once you've reached the point of no return.
Death ends your consciousness of the torture, it doesn't erase it unfortunately.
That concept of a lack of free will is flawed. And by that logic, the prolifers are also acting out of a fated path, rather than choosing to harass us, so are they free from blame as well? Murderers? Rapists? Child molesters?
People make the informed decision not to have children every day.
I do not think rolling the dice on a human life is morally or ethically sound, you're gambling with the unknown and you're not even the one who suffers the consequences.
Just because some people get a better hand dealt to them, doesn't mean their pleasure matters more than our pain, it doesn't mean continued procreation and risking more lives to roll snake eyes just to get some that roll otherwise, is worth it.
We need to stop sacrificing people to a nightmare life, just for the off-chance that they might end up one of the lucky ones, the ones who use the less fortunate as stepping stones to their own end, and beginning.
If you told me I would have 10 children and 9 of them would live mostly happy, fulfilled lives, while 1 of them would suffer to the point of suicide, or even at all in relation to their siblings...for that very fact alone, I would refuse to have a single one of them, just so that I wouldn't risk the suffering of that one child.
We were referring to human instincts and the ability for a human being to control themselves rather than blame their actions on a "natural instinct".
So something like cancer wouldn't come into the equation regardless, it wasn't specific enough to the conversation to be relevant.
Also I'm not sure if you are calling my own words stupid or the argument I was outlining..which was my point, that it's ridiculous-to say we can't control whether we procreate on the basis of a natural "urge" but not apply that same flawed logic to other types of "natural urges/instincts", many of which have been (rightfully) outlawed in modern society and most of us manage just fine.
It's a slippery slope, the "natural, therefore good and permitted" argument.
I am pretty sure we are in agreement on that ..
I knew you knew that, I just wanted to post.I agree. How I said it is misleading probably. I don't mean it's impossible to be angry or even that one shouldn't be angry; of course some people are angry, and I find myself slipping back into resentment for my parents sometimes. To put it more clearly, acknowledging the lack of free will often helps reduce any anger I would otherwise have for them.
ReasonableI think a lot of the reasons why we want to ctb overlap with the tenets of antinatalism. Ultimately we are all here because of the selfish desires of our parents/ancestors. It is not like we had any say in what gender, race, nationality, socioeconomic class, etc we are born into.
I am frankly embarrassed and ashamed of my parents and family. I know I have no right to criticize anyone since I'm no prize either but at least I can recognize that I am a deeply flawed person. So many people mindlessly have kids in terrible circumstances and then demand/guilt them into being grateful for a shitty life they never asked for.
It just frustrates me that I have to exist in this unrelenting hell and if I want to escape I have to overcome biological instincts imprinted on a genetic level. Living sucks but dying is hard. If I never existed I never had to experience the agony of life and the fear of death. People who bring new lives into this hell are evil.
The most mature response to this thread.If the universe rolls good dice for you, then there can be a lot of joy in life. I know I've had some amazing experiences here and others have told me they have too. I definitely acknowledge the suffering as well though and how awful it can be, which is why I think a right to die is essential. Some people just suffer terribly, and ALL people deserve that option.
The strongest belief I hold is that we don't have free will. That means I can't be angry at my parents for conceiving me, it wasn't a free choice of theirs. They were compelled to procreate, much the same as I am compelled to die.
Anti-natalism is just as stupid as selfish-procreation. There's being bitter about your shitty lot in life and "Not having the right to choose to be born" as stupid as that logic is, and then there's being illogically bitter about a fundemental force of life and creation.
The bottom line. Short and sweet.Just legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia, breed all you want, but leave people a peaceful exit when they deem life is too unbearable.
LogicalJust legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia, breed all you want, but leave people a peaceful exit when they deem life is too unbearable.