Maybe this will become a low effort controversial post. I cannot spend a day on SaSu without posting in politics.
I think I will have to make it clear he wasn't a briliant mind. I am scared to go to bed after posting this. And waking up getting banned from SaSu. Lol. I pose this provocative question because some intellectuals like Chomsky use this claim as ridiculous excuse for meeting him. And I try to expose this narrative by showing on here with whom these fraudsters were friends with.
I think we all except Nick Funetes and the incel groypers can agree that Epstein was a disgusting filthy monster that should rot in hell. But because it is me I have to pose the question was a he actually smart person? Morally corrupt as fuck. But intelligence wise? I cannot emphasize enough that he was extremely disgusting. And one person that should have been excessively raped in prison till the rest of his life.
You know you hear a lot. He did not have a college degree. He was a failed teacher at a private school. Then he became an investment banker. I think wikipedia will give you a better picture.
Epstein attended local public schools, first attending Public School 188, and then Mark Twain Junior High School nearby and usually earned money by tutoring classmates. Acquaintances considered Epstein "sweet and generous", although "quiet and nerdy", and nicknamed him "Eppy". "He was just an average boy, very smart in math, slightly overweight, freckles, always smiling", a female friend later described.[9]
In 1967, Epstein attended the National Music Camp at the Interlochen Center for the Arts.[13] He began playing the piano when he was five, and was regarded as a talented musician by friends.[14] He graduated in 1969 from Lafayette High School at age 16, having skipped two grades.[8][15] Later that year, he attended advanced math classes at Cooper Union until he changed colleges in 1971.[8] From September 1971, he attended the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences at New York University, where he studied mathematical physiology, but left without receiving a degree in June 1974.[8][15]
Private school teacher (1974–1976)
At age 21, Epstein started working in September 1974 as a physics and mathematics teacher for teens at the Dalton School on the Upper East Side of Manhattan.[8][16] Donald Barr, who served as the headmaster until June 1974,[17][18][19] was known to have made several unconventional recruitments at the time, although it is unclear whether he had a direct role in hiring Epstein.[16][20][21] Three months after Barr's departure, Epstein began to teach at the school, despite his lack of credentials.[21][16]
Epstein allegedly showed inappropriate behavior toward underage female students at the time, paying them constant attention, and even showing up at a party where young people were drinking, according to a former student.[20] Other former students also often saw him flirting with female students. Eventually, Epstein became acquainted with Alan Greenberg, the chief executive officer of Bear Stearns, whose son and daughter were attending the school.[15] Greenberg's daughter, Lynne Koeppel, pointed to a parent-teacher conference where Epstein influenced another Dalton parent into advocating for him to Greenberg.[18] In June 1976, after Epstein was dismissed from Dalton for "poor performance",[16][22][23] Greenberg offered him a job at Bear Stearns.[14][2
The English wikipedia article is fucking detailed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein
Later he became investment banker and probably quadruple intelligence asset.
Here is what Chomsky seemingly/allegedly? said about him. The biggest critic of Israel and the Western world ruined his legacy by spending time with this pedocrimincal. I think we all can be glad that Chomsky is still alive to experience that his legacy is shred into pieces.
To whom it may concern:
I met Jeffrey Epstein half a dozen years ago. We have been in regular contact since, with many long and often in-depth discussions about a very wide range of topics, including our own specialties and professional work, but a host of others where we have shared interests. It has been a most valuable experience for me.
In the area of his own direct engagements, I have learned a great deal from him about the intricacies of the global financial system, about complex technical issues that arise in the often arcane world of finance, and about specific cases in which I have a particular interest, such as the financial situation in Saudi Arabia and current economic planning and prospects there. Jeffrey invariably turns out to be a highly reliable source, with intimate knowledge and perceptive analysis, commonly going well beyond what I can find in the business press and professional journals.
Turning to my own special interests in linguistics, cognitive science, and philosophy of language and mind, Jeffrey constantly raises searching questions and puts forth provocative ideas, which have repeatedly led me to rethink crucial issues.
We have also had (for me) very rewarding discussions on many other topics, for example the prospects for Artificial Intelligence, deep learning, multi-layered neural nets, automation and robotics, singularity, and related matters, exploring the claims and predictions and looking closely at the results that have been achieved, their intellectual contributions and social import. We have also discussed many other issues, ranging from intellectual history, to world affairs and contemporary geopolitics, to foundations of mathematics, to such matters as recent discoveries about communication in the plant world. He has also tried, so far with limited success, to carry forward my wife Valeria's efforts to introduce me to the world of jazz and its wonders. Whatever comes up, Jeffrey not only has a lively interest but also unconventional and challenging ideas and thoughtful suggestions.
Given the range and depth of his concerns, I suppose I should not have been surprised to discover that Jeffrey has repeatedly been able to arrange, sometimes on the spot, very productive meetings with leading figures in the sciences and mathematics, and global politics, people whose work and activities I had looked into though I had never expected to meet them. Once, when we were discussing the Oslo agreements, Jeffrey picked up the phone and called the Norwegian diplomat who supervised them, leading to a lively interchange. On another occasion, Jeffrey arranged a meeting with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, whose record I had studied carefully and written about. We have our disagreements, but had a very fruitful discussion about a number of controversial matters, including one that was of particular interest to me: the Taba negotiations of January 2001, in the framework of President Clinton's "parameters," events that remain obscure and controversial because the diplomatic record is still mostly secret. Barak's discussion of the background was illuminating, also surprising in some ways. In very different areas, much the same was true in meetings Jeffrey arranged with evolutionary biologists, neuroscientists, mathematicians and computer scientists, several of them engaged in exciting work at the limits of understanding in their fields, sometimes with perspectives quite different from mine. More lively interchanges, in which Jeffrey was once again an active participant, often an effective gadfly.
The impact of Jeffrey's limitless curiosity, extensive knowledge, penetrating insights, and thoughtful appraisals is only heightened by his easy informality, without a trace of pretentiousness. He quickly became a highly valued friend and regular source of intellectual exchange and stimulation.
Noam Chomsky
Institute Professor (emeritus), MIT; Laureate Professor, U. of Arizona
I think I will have to make it clear he wasn't a briliant mind. I am scared to go to bed after posting this. And waking up getting banned from SaSu. Lol. I pose this provocative question because some intellectuals like Chomsky use this claim as ridiculous excuse for meeting him. And I try to expose this narrative by showing on here with whom these fraudsters were friends with.
I think we all except Nick Funetes and the incel groypers can agree that Epstein was a disgusting filthy monster that should rot in hell. But because it is me I have to pose the question was a he actually smart person? Morally corrupt as fuck. But intelligence wise? I cannot emphasize enough that he was extremely disgusting. And one person that should have been excessively raped in prison till the rest of his life.
You know you hear a lot. He did not have a college degree. He was a failed teacher at a private school. Then he became an investment banker. I think wikipedia will give you a better picture.
Epstein attended local public schools, first attending Public School 188, and then Mark Twain Junior High School nearby and usually earned money by tutoring classmates. Acquaintances considered Epstein "sweet and generous", although "quiet and nerdy", and nicknamed him "Eppy". "He was just an average boy, very smart in math, slightly overweight, freckles, always smiling", a female friend later described.[9]
In 1967, Epstein attended the National Music Camp at the Interlochen Center for the Arts.[13] He began playing the piano when he was five, and was regarded as a talented musician by friends.[14] He graduated in 1969 from Lafayette High School at age 16, having skipped two grades.[8][15] Later that year, he attended advanced math classes at Cooper Union until he changed colleges in 1971.[8] From September 1971, he attended the Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences at New York University, where he studied mathematical physiology, but left without receiving a degree in June 1974.[8][15]
Private school teacher (1974–1976)
At age 21, Epstein started working in September 1974 as a physics and mathematics teacher for teens at the Dalton School on the Upper East Side of Manhattan.[8][16] Donald Barr, who served as the headmaster until June 1974,[17][18][19] was known to have made several unconventional recruitments at the time, although it is unclear whether he had a direct role in hiring Epstein.[16][20][21] Three months after Barr's departure, Epstein began to teach at the school, despite his lack of credentials.[21][16]
Epstein allegedly showed inappropriate behavior toward underage female students at the time, paying them constant attention, and even showing up at a party where young people were drinking, according to a former student.[20] Other former students also often saw him flirting with female students. Eventually, Epstein became acquainted with Alan Greenberg, the chief executive officer of Bear Stearns, whose son and daughter were attending the school.[15] Greenberg's daughter, Lynne Koeppel, pointed to a parent-teacher conference where Epstein influenced another Dalton parent into advocating for him to Greenberg.[18] In June 1976, after Epstein was dismissed from Dalton for "poor performance",[16][22][23] Greenberg offered him a job at Bear Stearns.[14][2
The English wikipedia article is fucking detailed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein
Later he became investment banker and probably quadruple intelligence asset.
Here is what Chomsky seemingly/allegedly? said about him. The biggest critic of Israel and the Western world ruined his legacy by spending time with this pedocrimincal. I think we all can be glad that Chomsky is still alive to experience that his legacy is shred into pieces.
To whom it may concern:
I met Jeffrey Epstein half a dozen years ago. We have been in regular contact since, with many long and often in-depth discussions about a very wide range of topics, including our own specialties and professional work, but a host of others where we have shared interests. It has been a most valuable experience for me.
In the area of his own direct engagements, I have learned a great deal from him about the intricacies of the global financial system, about complex technical issues that arise in the often arcane world of finance, and about specific cases in which I have a particular interest, such as the financial situation in Saudi Arabia and current economic planning and prospects there. Jeffrey invariably turns out to be a highly reliable source, with intimate knowledge and perceptive analysis, commonly going well beyond what I can find in the business press and professional journals.
Turning to my own special interests in linguistics, cognitive science, and philosophy of language and mind, Jeffrey constantly raises searching questions and puts forth provocative ideas, which have repeatedly led me to rethink crucial issues.
We have also had (for me) very rewarding discussions on many other topics, for example the prospects for Artificial Intelligence, deep learning, multi-layered neural nets, automation and robotics, singularity, and related matters, exploring the claims and predictions and looking closely at the results that have been achieved, their intellectual contributions and social import. We have also discussed many other issues, ranging from intellectual history, to world affairs and contemporary geopolitics, to foundations of mathematics, to such matters as recent discoveries about communication in the plant world. He has also tried, so far with limited success, to carry forward my wife Valeria's efforts to introduce me to the world of jazz and its wonders. Whatever comes up, Jeffrey not only has a lively interest but also unconventional and challenging ideas and thoughtful suggestions.
Given the range and depth of his concerns, I suppose I should not have been surprised to discover that Jeffrey has repeatedly been able to arrange, sometimes on the spot, very productive meetings with leading figures in the sciences and mathematics, and global politics, people whose work and activities I had looked into though I had never expected to meet them. Once, when we were discussing the Oslo agreements, Jeffrey picked up the phone and called the Norwegian diplomat who supervised them, leading to a lively interchange. On another occasion, Jeffrey arranged a meeting with former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, whose record I had studied carefully and written about. We have our disagreements, but had a very fruitful discussion about a number of controversial matters, including one that was of particular interest to me: the Taba negotiations of January 2001, in the framework of President Clinton's "parameters," events that remain obscure and controversial because the diplomatic record is still mostly secret. Barak's discussion of the background was illuminating, also surprising in some ways. In very different areas, much the same was true in meetings Jeffrey arranged with evolutionary biologists, neuroscientists, mathematicians and computer scientists, several of them engaged in exciting work at the limits of understanding in their fields, sometimes with perspectives quite different from mine. More lively interchanges, in which Jeffrey was once again an active participant, often an effective gadfly.
The impact of Jeffrey's limitless curiosity, extensive knowledge, penetrating insights, and thoughtful appraisals is only heightened by his easy informality, without a trace of pretentiousness. He quickly became a highly valued friend and regular source of intellectual exchange and stimulation.
Noam Chomsky
Institute Professor (emeritus), MIT; Laureate Professor, U. of Arizona
Last edited:
