A
Argo
Specialist
- May 19, 2018
- 360
Imagine any difficult problem. Just close your eyes and get a rough picture of something, it can be undefined. Now imagine trying to solve this problem, except without much of an understanding of the problem ...?
Wouldn't that be frustrating, feel hopeless and like a struggle?
What that means is, understanding has to be the first step to reliably solving any problem-- understanding is what opens the door.
I've personally not found anyone more clear on trauma than Timothy Fletcher:
Solving is still hard, there are lots of good and bad attitudes and methods and so on, but it's almost impossible without understanding first. Now imagine the same problem from before-- except now, instead of a lack of understanding, you have total understanding. You have a genuine clarity and wisdom towards the problem. What happens then? (I'm not saying some kind of omniscience is possible or should be a goal, but it's worth imagining what it would do and what it would mean)
Wouldn't that be frustrating, feel hopeless and like a struggle?
What that means is, understanding has to be the first step to reliably solving any problem-- understanding is what opens the door.
I've personally not found anyone more clear on trauma than Timothy Fletcher:
Solving is still hard, there are lots of good and bad attitudes and methods and so on, but it's almost impossible without understanding first. Now imagine the same problem from before-- except now, instead of a lack of understanding, you have total understanding. You have a genuine clarity and wisdom towards the problem. What happens then? (I'm not saying some kind of omniscience is possible or should be a goal, but it's worth imagining what it would do and what it would mean)
Last edited: