
UterEntonaur
Specialist
- Aug 17, 2020
- 340
I don't think that word and Stop SS can be used in the same sentenceintelligence
UK users: Due to a formal investigation into this site by Ofcom under the UK Online Safety Act 2023, we strongly recommend using a trusted, no-logs VPN. This will help protect your privacy, bypass censorship, and maintain secure access to the site. Read the full VPN guide here.
Today, OFCOM launched an official investigation into Sanctioned Suicide under the UK’s Online Safety Act. This has already made headlines across the UK.
This is a clear and unprecedented overreach by a foreign regulator against a U.S.-based platform. We reject this interference and will be defending the site’s existence and mission.
In addition to our public response, we are currently seeking legal representation to ensure the best possible defense in this matter. If you are a lawyer or know of one who may be able to assist, please contact us at [email protected].
Read our statement here:
Donate via cryptocurrency:
I don't think that word and Stop SS can be used in the same sentenceintelligence
It can be. But only if it's preceded by 'not'I don't think that word and Stop SS can be used in the same sentence![]()
Pretty much. What is it with these entitled people thinking that they have the right to ban shit because "muh kids"? It's not up to some internet anons to raise anyone's children.If I was a child and had these people as parents I'd want to commit suicide too. If you actually want to prevent children from accessing any website there are numerous ways to do that. You can set up site filters for your wifi network, you can cut off their data plan. You as a parent have literally way more responsibility over your child's well-being than some forum of sad people.
I can only speak for myself.. but I have suffered from mental illness more or less from childhood.. and NEVER have I found understanding that even comes close to what I get here. I keep trying to find it out in the world from friends, family, professionals but no.. true acceptance and non judgemental understanding of the dark side of my ideation alongside comfort, support and humour only exists here in this unique place.Not sure what reactions you guys are/were expecting by waltzing into a private FB group, whose main feature is pro-life activism and advocating for the censorship of peaceful pill education/how-to's. You guys would pounce on pro-life rhetoric and verbally eviscerate the poster if they came to SS.
Remind me again -- what's the purpose of engaging with these people? What is the reasoning behind leaving your egotistical entrails for them to publicly crucify? Because you are giving them momentum by mearly just engaging with them, and the entrails of your egos that you leave behind are literally used as momentos for legal purposes, and those screenshots can be weaponized against this website. And I know this isn't just passive-respectful engagement, it's two attack dogs from both sides of the aisle who've got their teeth lock-jawed into the other person's neck. Absolutely pointless discussion. Of course they don't care about suicidal individuals outside of their most loved ones, e.g. the sons/daughters of theirs who have killed themselves. They aren't different from anyone else. Literally NO ONE cares if you're suicidal. Why would these people embrace you any differently?
Parents these days allow the internet, TV, etc to raise their children instead of themselves and then act shocked when that causes problems.Pretty much. What is it with these entitled people thinking that they have the right to ban shit because "muh kids"? It's not up to some internet anons to raise anyone's children.
Yeah, as in blaming it for all their kids' problemsWho would go back to "violent video games"? Fixthe26?
well first of all the goverement has more responsibility and control over children than the parents do, for example children are forced to go to school and learn certain subjects obviously some comprimeses can be made such as homeschooling and religious exclusions from certain topics, and the government have every right to remove children from bad livign situations and place them in social care if the parents are not meeting the level of care expected of them chosen by the law makers in this country.... saying that is entirely the parents responsibility to ensure that children aren't accessing suicide websites completely negates every single policy in place and children can and have been forcefully removed from their parents by social services... so i think it is a very narrow viewpoint to have that parents should be responsible for their children and goverement shouldn't get involved. when already how raised child is policed largely by the goverement and the parents just follow the rules given to them and if they break it the goverement will take their children.If I was a child and had these people as parents I'd want to commit suicide too. If you actually want to prevent children from accessing any website there are numerous ways to do that. You can set up site filters for your wifi network, you can cut off their data plan. You as a parent have literally way more responsibility over your child's well-being than some forum of sad people.
Since when has this website ever even attempted to entice kids into the website? It has been made clear plenty of times that children here are not allowed lest they ruin it for everyone else. You know what, I might as well start discouraging minors from being here.
If you're a child and you're reading this, I don't care how suicidal you are, FUCK OFF. Don't turn your parents/guardians into more of these narcissistic losers, just get off this website and leave us alone. Stop making things worse for the rest of us by giving these guys what they want. If you wanna act like a mature adult, then realize you aren't allowed here and just go away.
I never actually said that parents are solely responsible for their children, just way moreso than some forum of depressed people or any other random website should ever be. You're right about the government having a substantial role in child welfare though. I'm just saying that for matters like these governments aren't really meant to be involved (though that depends on where you live). Generally, if a child is watching gore or porn on 4chan, the government likely won't (or shouldn't) be sending SWAT teams to the child's house to make them stop. It's up to the parents to step in and do something about it like setting up filters. That's all I'm asking.well first of all the goverement has more responsibility and control over children than the parents do, for example children are forced to go to school and learn certain subjects obviously some comprimeses can be made such as homeschooling and religious exclusions from certain topics, and the government have every right to remove children from bad livign situations and place them in social care if the parents are not meeting the level of care expected of them chosen by the law makers in this country.... saying that is entirely the parents responsibility to ensure that children aren't accessing suicide websites completely negates every single policy in place and children can and have been forcefully removed from their parents by social services... so i think it is a very narrow viewpoint to have that parents should be responsible for their children and goverement shouldn't get involved. when already how raised child is policed largely by the goverement and the parents just follow the rules given to them and if they break it the goverement will take their children.
...
...
but a lot of people who kill themselves probably had trauma from childhood abuse, maybe they never even realised because they thought the abuse was normal. the family members of those that kill themselves are probably not the best people to be rooting for such a cause, a lot of the time they were probably part of the reason they killed themselves. Most parents are terrible anyway, I think they get bossed around all day at work living a shitty life and being controlling over a hopeless child gets to their head and they start taking their anger out on the child, same with dog owners. parents shouldn't have children unless they are satisfied with their life as they will want to live through their child and push unfair expectations on their child and not allow them to live life how they want. Just showing them off as a trophy "my child got into oxford", "my child became a lawyer"... always want they want the child to be and never respecting what they child wants to be.
so i am kinda a liberation and believe in freedom away from institutions (a long with goverement) but there should be way more done to prevent children from accessing sites like gore sites. Just having filters in place on the routers that parents have to manly opt out of is a good start. for example tv companies have to follow a watershed so it reduces the risk of children seeing explicit types of content on tv, obviously the goverement cant force parents to put their children in bed at a certain time and prevent them watching explicit shows however its worth lowering the amount of children at risk of seeing explicit content and its not normalised either. saying that children can get around the restrictions anyway, so its pointless to restrict is like saying people get murdered anyway so its pointless to have laws against murder.I never actually said that parents are solely responsible for their children, just way moreso than some forum of depressed people or any other random website should ever be. You're right about the government having a substantial role in child welfare though. I'm just saying that for matters like these governments aren't really meant to be involved (though that depends on where you live). Generally, if a child is watching gore or porn on 4chan, the government likely won't (or shouldn't) be sending SWAT teams to the child's house to make them stop. It's up to the parents to step in and do something about it like setting up filters. That's all I'm asking.
Are you suggesting the site go more underground then? It's already out from Google in some countries. Whining to hosts and domain companies is the last thing we want since that already recently forced this site to move and change its url. Ironically most people only found the new url because of the pro lifers being dense as usual and blaring it out anyway.they are right tho that the best way to prevent children from accessing sites like these are making them as hards as possible to get access to, constantly closing them down and driving them underground, getting search engines to refuse to index them, isps to block the sites, hosting companies to refuse to host it, domain name companies to refuse to use the domain, making them as hard to access and as underground as possible prevents as many children from accessing the content as possible.
yes, the only way to make this site harder to access for minors is to make this site harder to access for everyone. deplatforming is the best option for them...Are you suggesting the site go more underground then? It's already out from Google in some countries. Whining to hosts and domain companies is the last thing we want since that already recently forced this site to move and change its url. Ironically most people only found the new url because of the pro lifers being dense as usual and blaring it out anyway.
I'm all for adding more new measures to shut out minors but only as long as current members who are perfectly above the legal age can still access the site with no extra hassle. I have no ideas of my own beyond maybe ID verification but as people have mentioned before that would just open up too many privacy concerns...
Well it kind of is as deplatformed as possible since again it's showing up on less and less search engines. I'm pretty sure the site was blocked off except for certain sections to non members, though I don't know if that's still in effect...yes, the only way to make this site harder to access for minors is to make this site harder to access for everyone. deplatforming is the best option for them...
personally i donnt care about anything but death but from their pov i would try to deplatform the website
Imagine having nothing better to do in the weekend but try and get a website shut down what a waste of time. They should try a hobby .Ah yes, let's cower in fear of the pro-lifers and hide from them by going underground.
![]()
As of right now, all the pro-lifers group does is antagonize us to fight against them, but we don't give them the time of day to do such things, so they resort to making up stories that we have young'uns on here and that we troll vulnerable populations to gain more members. We're doing something right when the pro-lifers have ran out of things to talk about while they stew in their own inability to get this place shut down.
Does planning your suicide count as a hobby?Imagine having nothing better to do in the weekend but try and get a website shut down what a waste of time. They should try a hobby .
Yeah it's so bonkers personally. "I've benefited from SS so now I want it shut down so other people don't find it"???but the way he hung SS out to dry in his suicide note makes no sense to me. why would he blame his suicide on this site and vilify it the way he did. i find it annoying tbh
If I got berated and doxxed by anti-choicers I'd probably end up suicidal in my parents' basement with no future prospects of any kind.I'm scared to mention the Facebook group because I'm scared they'll berate or dox me.