B
Brayu
Student
- Sep 14, 2021
- 192
Yes, socialism has flaws... monarchical absolutism has flaws...
But taking the western example that jumped from the old regime straight to modern capitalism... It's a mistake, one of the things that moved people was the ideal of equality and now what we have is even less equality, because now there are not only "3 states", but a very well stratified pyramid... Nowadays someone who earns the minimum wage (in my country it's only 200 dollars) thinks he has the right to humiliate an unemployed person (the rich can do much worse than that) .
Today, the richest form the so-called "noble neighborhoods" and in my country they even build a wall so the poor can't access it (it's not a condominium).
How much more egalitarian is a society like this than the one they overthrew in 1789? Democracy? democracy in countries like mine are just details and when a fraction of the people oppose the bourgeois order they install dictatorships and that's it.
Even today bankers rule more than presidents and kings, this seems to me extremely offensive. In this way, the interest is no longer that of a ruling elite, but the economic elite.
Unemployment? We all know how much this is in the interests of economic elites (to put pressure on and make it impossible for someone to ask for better working conditions). The political elite today can only obey the economic elite.
But taking the western example that jumped from the old regime straight to modern capitalism... It's a mistake, one of the things that moved people was the ideal of equality and now what we have is even less equality, because now there are not only "3 states", but a very well stratified pyramid... Nowadays someone who earns the minimum wage (in my country it's only 200 dollars) thinks he has the right to humiliate an unemployed person (the rich can do much worse than that) .
Today, the richest form the so-called "noble neighborhoods" and in my country they even build a wall so the poor can't access it (it's not a condominium).
How much more egalitarian is a society like this than the one they overthrew in 1789? Democracy? democracy in countries like mine are just details and when a fraction of the people oppose the bourgeois order they install dictatorships and that's it.
Even today bankers rule more than presidents and kings, this seems to me extremely offensive. In this way, the interest is no longer that of a ruling elite, but the economic elite.
Unemployment? We all know how much this is in the interests of economic elites (to put pressure on and make it impossible for someone to ask for better working conditions). The political elite today can only obey the economic elite.