• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
R

RazzleDazzle

The void stares back.
Sep 16, 2021
359
I think I am misunderstanding something here. Plz explain to me lol.

If you are about to jump off a cliff and your body literally won't let you? No thoughts, just "my body won't let me do this"? Is that survival instinct? Can it be avoided?

No thoughts, just "my body literally won't let me do this," falls under the heading of instinct. Some methods are going to be more prone to survival instinct. Throwing oneself off a cliff is one of them.

People do commit suicide, all the time. It is possible to do. Some methods tend to be more successful than others.

But I think that it's worth looking at what the hesitation is saying. If someone is struggling to complete suicide, it's worth pausing to look at any underlying hesitation. Maybe there is a part of them that hasn't been heard that wants to be heard.

I don't think that we should be promoting the narrative that any hesitation is a problem that needs to be overcome. This is not a pro-suicide site, it is not the goal if the site to promote suicide. If someone has hesitation, the pro-choice stance is to encourage them to look at what that hesitation might be saying. Because a pro-choice stance includes the possibility of changing your mind, of making a different choice. A pro-choice stance says that suicide is one option among many.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: isolute_2488, Somewhat Suicidal, pickedmyctbdate and 2 others
P

pickedmyctbdate

Member
Aug 6, 2026
75
Interesting conversation---especially since using "SI" can refer to "survival instinct" OR "suicidal ideation," and while it's usually clear from context which one is intended, there may be situations where one acronym is mistaken for the other.

Obviously, people overcome survival instinct: Several good examples above, such as parental instinct overcoming one's own fear for their life. Various cultural forms of suicide, such as religious or political convictions, which prove that not all suicides are the result of "chemical imbalances in the brain," but that some people believe there are things worth dying for. And, of course, the fact that many commit suicide every day.

For myself at least, I don't consider it a lack of courage to not ctb. Just to re-emphasize, I am speaking here only for myself. I think it's, on balance, a dissipation of the desire to do so. If I had the means in my hand right now, I would not do it. I came on here, read other people's stories and feelings, barfed out my own feelings, and now I don't want to. Not yet.

(Makes my handle kind of ironic. I still want to change it "Horrifyingly Gruesome." I wish I could find that article that, while not endorsing this forum, did not condemn it either. It was remarkably objective, which may be why it's no longer on the Internet.)

the simpsons helen GIF


If I had the means in my hand right now and I did wish to die, I still don't think that would be a lack of courage. It might be survival instinct. Or second thoughts. Or facing the enormity of the decision. There are very few such irreversible decisions in life. I just don't see courage or bravery as having anything to do with it one way or the other.
I had a user tell me that it was my survival instinct talking when I wrote something about the different considerations involved in making this decision. And several people agreed with them. After that I saw several other comments/posts where people mentioned their survival instinct affecting their ability to move forward with suicide.

Which is what led me to make this post, because I think it is harmful to lump any thoughts or feelings that conflict with committing suicide into "survival instinct." Because there is an attitude that survival instinct is just something that needs to be overpowered and overcome.

The entire point I wanted to make is that, if you are nowhere near an eminent threat to your survival, and you are having second thoughts about committing suicide and mixed feelings about it, those are your actual thoughts and feelings. They are not something to be overcome, they are to be listened to and considered

Basically, I agree with this. Second thoughts are worth exploring. When I'm feeling suicidal, I feel lethargic and helpless. (Again,I am speaking here only for myself.) On balance, I would rather not feel that way. I just don't seem to have any choice in the matter of when those feelings overtake me and I no longer see any point in continuing to hope when my hopes have continually failed throughout my life. I'm a financial burden on my ex, and there isn't anyone who would care if I vanished into a puff of smoke. All of that is still true. None of it has become any less true just because I don't feel the desire to end my life right now. Those feelings have come and gone since I was probably about 12 years old, which logically gives me some pause because if I can rid myself of the feelings, the only reason to do it would be to prevent them from coming back.

I suppose at some point, the feelings would have to last long enough that I was too exhausted by them to keep going. I would estimate the feelings have lasted anywhere from a few days to a few months. I suppose if I'd had NO second thoughts I would not have relocated this forum, because I know talking about it is likely to talk me back off the proverbial ledge. (Although the method I had planned probably wouldn't have worked, which I think should also be a careful consideration before going through with it.)
I think where it gets tricky is that many people want to die and take actions to kill themselves, but somehow they always sabotage their own attempts. For example, they call friends and family in the last moment, who then come and save them, or they make very apparent and easy-to-avoid errors when they plan their attempt. Perhaps these kinds of things don't fit the strict definition of survival instinct, but they are still built-in, subconscious, instinctive mechanisms that increase the chance of our survival.

We can even consider broader behaviours that increase the chance of our survival, like procrastination, lying in bed depressed, or spending an endless amount of time on planning an attempt but never actually taking action. I see why these things are hard to view as forms of survival instinct, yet we often default to these behaviours and tend to gravitate toward anything that avoids or postpones death.

I think many people here want to die but face internal resistance that makes it impossible to act on their desires. When this happens, they just use 'survival instinct' as a blanket term for what they're experiencing.

I agree, and I hate it when therapists refer to this as a "cry for help." Maybe it is for some people, I don't know. But it's sounds so demeaning, it just pisses me right off.

There's definitely some truth for me that when I'm suicidally depressed, I don't have the energy to get up and do anything about it.

I think these things are worth examining and shouldn't be hand-waved away as a "cry for help." Same with self-harm. When I self-harm, it is not a "cry for help," it's a way of dampening my desire to die. I don't know why it works, but it does. I guess in those moments, I'm so filled with self-hatred that "punishing myself" seems like enough for awhile.

I definitely think survival instinct is real, and that recoiling from an imminent threat of death is hard-wired into most of us. But there are other reasons people want to die besides depression. As my mother got older and lost the capacity to do the things she enjoyed, she lost her will to live. She would never have ctb, for the same reason I never would have while she was still alive. We had the other one's feelings to consider. A few months before she died, I had a dream (which I no longer have any memory of) in which I believe I saw the afterlife. I've always been agnostic about an afterlife. I've believed in a Divine Mystery (probably not an anthropomorphized invisible human), but the existence of God doesn't logically mean there is life after death any more than I had life before birth. (People think I'm off-my-rocker when I say this, as though the only reason to believe in some Divine Anthropomorphized Mystery is the promise of living in HappyLand after death. Or a threat to keep you keep you on the straight and narrow to avoid hell, both of which I think are such....human-limited reasons....)

But this dream was extremely vivid and I knew upon waking that I had to relay every detail to my mother. I believe I was given this dream as a gift for her, to tell her not to be afraid to die, that this life isn't all there is. She died peacefully in her sleep a few months later, and I'd like to think that dream helped ease her fear of dying. Because she was ready to go by then. She was very old. She was in remarkably good health for her age, but arthritis and blindness were preventing her from doing the things she loved to. It gives me more peace than I can express that I know she was ready, and that her death investigation determined the cause as sudden massive heart failure. The scene suggested she had likely fallen asleep before she died, within half an hour of my last conversation with her.

I realize this probably sounds bananas to many people here to don't believe in any sort of deity or afterlife at all, maybe even dread the possibility of an afterlife (the way I dread the thought of reincarnation---once was enough!). But this is a speaking only for myself post.

If it weren't for me, or if I had died of some other cause before she did, I believe Mom would have taken her own life.
She was super-pissed that I couldn't promise her there would be no autopsy.
"I'm 85 years old! Don't let them cut me open to tell you the cause of death was life!"
"I don't make that choice, Mom. If you're not in the hospital, it will be up to law enforcement and the coroner."
"Why?? When I'm gone, all the decisions are yours!"
"Well, because if it's unattended, they want to make sure I didn't murder you or something."
"You're not going to murder me!"
"I know that , you know that, but the cops don't know that."

Fortunately, the coroner followed her wishes, given that dying peacefully in sleep runs in my family. And maybe I would prefer to go that way. I'm glad it's in my genes!

But if I get to be 85, or 75, or 65, or next week, and I can no longer do anything that gives me joy in life, I have no idea if a survival instinct would make it difficult to end it myself at that point. I think it's beyond cruel that we force people and their loved ones to often suffer through the entire natural dying process.


But barring a situation like that, I believe I should think long and hard before making the decision to end my life. Courage has nothing to do it for me. "Cries for help" have nothing to do with it for me. Honestly, I believe a lot more people experience suicidal desires at some point in their lives and many just aren't honest about it because it's socially unacceptable---diagnosable, less-than, "crazy"---to acknowledge such feelings. Not much help for someone like me who can restore my equilibrium by honestly considering it. Someday, the answer may be "yes," but until now, openly discussing it without someone clutching their pearls and telling me, "It takes more courage to live!" 🤮 has resulted in a "Not right now."

Come to think of it, maybe that's my aversion to the idea that it takes courage to ctb. Because the flip side of that is: "Oh, but it take more courage to live!" 🤮 And I hate such platitudes about such an important decision.
 
Last edited:
AreWeWinning

AreWeWinning

·
Nov 1, 2021
644
According to Miriam Webster, an instinct is:

a: a largely inheritable and unalterable tendency of an organism to make a complex and specific response to environmental stimuli without involving reason

b: behavior that is mediated by reactions below the conscious level

According to the Cambridge dictionary, instinct is:

the way people or animals naturally react or behave, without having to think or learn about it

THE DEFINITION OF THE WORD INSTINCT REQUIRES FOR IT TO NOT BE CONSCIOUS THOUGHT. IF IT INVOLVES CONSCIOUS THOUGHT AND REASONING, IT IS NOT AN INSTINCT.

If people want to talk about their motivations and drives to stay alive, that's legitimate and fine, but we can't just change the definition of words to fit what we want to say. Words have meaning. This term has a specific meaning.

I was also referring to behaviours where someone does want to commit suicide and genuinely believes that they're working toward an attempt but subconsciously fall into behaviours that ultimately delay or prevent their death. I think these behaviours fit the definitions you cited.

And it's pretty fucked up and irresponsible for us, as a community, to act like having conflicting thoughts and emotions about committing suicide is just some primitive instinct we need to work to overcome. That's a deeply unethical position to hold, as well as being incorrect.
Encouraging the idea that *any* resistance to killing oneself is just an instinct that needs to be overcome is factually incorrect. And it is also crossing the line from pro-choice into pro-suicide.

I hear what you're saying, but I don't think these ideas are encouraged or promoted here. People are just voicing their thoughts and personal experiences. I never see posts where people are encouraged to overcome their fear or hesitation about killing themselves.

If you don't want to call it survival instinct, that's fine. However, there are still people who want to commit suicide but face some internal resistance that keeps them from doing it. They genuinely want to do it but can't act on that desire for some reason, and they're frustrated by this. If what you're saying is that in these situations the default response should always be to discourage them and encourage them to reconsider their decision, then I'd argue that this isn't pro-choice, but pro-life. I know I'm being argumentative, and I'm not sure where the line is between pro-life and pro-suicide, but there are two sides to every story.
 
Last edited:
Passenger4224

Passenger4224

I appreciate everything that can kill me.
Mar 8, 2026
647
No thoughts, just "my body literally won't let me do this," falls under the heading of instinct. Some methods are going to be more prone to survival instinct. Throwing oneself off a cliff is one of them.

People do commit suicide, all the time. It is possible to do. Some methods tend to be more successful than others.

But I think that it's worth looking at what the hesitation is saying. If someone is struggling to complete suicide, it's worth pausing to look at any underlying hesitation. Maybe there is a part of them that hasn't been heard that wants to be heard.

I don't think that we should be promoting the narrative that any hesitation is a problem that needs to be overcome. This is not a pro-suicide site, it is not the goal if the site to promote suicide. If someone has hesitation, the pro-choice stance is to encourage them to look at what that hesitation might be saying. Because a pro-choice stance includes the possibility of changing your mind, of making a different choice. A pro-choice stance says that suicide is one option among many.
That makes sense.

When I first made an account on this site, I held the belief that survival instinct shouldn't be much of an obstacle is someone truly wants to CTB. Since then I've spoken to many people who just couldn't do it, and I've aborted several attempts myself (though these were from anxiety/false hope and not survival instinct). Nowadays I don't know where I stand when it comes to that debate.

I guess my question is, do you think someone can genuinely want to die, but have a strong survival instinct that they aren't able to 'overcome' to reach that goal?

I ask too many questions lol. This topic interests me xD
 
Intoxicated

Intoxicated

Man
Nov 16, 2023
1,402
Well, I guess that's a matter of definition. If your instinct is to avoid pain, that will help you survive. The instinct to avoid pain, the reflex to breathe, the instinct to avoid/gag on gross bitter tastes (poison), fight/flight/freeze responses, etc - one could argue they could all be defined as survival instincts.
What if avoiding pain does exactly the opposite thing - promotes death? For example, a lot of suicides were committed (or at least attempted) by injured soldiers. I'll demonstrate a few vids, you can find way more cases:
How can a soldier get rid of an unbearable pain on the battlefield? A bullet to the head or a grenade explosion looks like a handy painkiller, doesn't it? And even cutting the neck with a barbed wire may look appealing if this can end severe suffering soon. If these soldiers got a survival instinct that cared about survival at all cost, they should have hoped for even slim chances to survive. But no, aversion to pain played the quite opposite role - they were rather motivated to kill themselves ASAP than fight for life no matter what. So I repeat my question: can survival instinct kill its owner? If pain avoidance is a survival instinct, then the answer is "yes", and it's a funny answer. If we postulate that survival instinct must never motivate its owner to commit suicide, then pain avoidance is not a survival instinct.

According to Miriam Webster, an instinct is:

a: a largely inheritable and unalterable tendency of an organism to make a complex and specific response to environmental stimuli without involving reason

b: behavior that is mediated by reactions below the conscious level
They confuse reflex and instinct.

Reflex Action.-- A reflex act, as has been earlier remarked, is one in which a muscular movement occurs in immediate response to a sensory stimulation without the interposition of consciousness. Consciousness is often aroused by reflex actions, but the motor reaction is not executed in response to conscious motives, and in the more deeply imbedded reflexes consciousness is quite powerless to suppress the movement. Thus, in winking we may be conscious that the eyelid has closed, and at times the movement may be executed voluntarily. But if a cinder or other irritating substance enter the eye we may be wholly unable to resist the tendency to shut the lids. On the other hand, when we are absorbed in reading our eyelids may close dozens of times in the reflex way, without our becoming in any definite manner aware of the fact.

Instincts.-- Instincts have an origin unquestionably similar to that of reflexes. They represent structurally reformed pathways in the nervous system, and stand functionally for effective inherited coordinations made in response to environmental demands. It is, perhaps, impossible to draw any absolutely sharp line between instincts and reflexes, although many principles of demarcation have been proposed. On the whole, the most fertile and suggestive working distinction seems to be found in the presence or absence of some relatively definite end dominating a series of acts. If the motor activity is simple, and is discharged in response to some objectively present stimulus, without conscious guidance, it will be safe to call the act a reflex. Moreover, some reflex acts are essentially unconscious, whereas instincts, in the higher animals at all events, appear always to involve consciousness. Instincts accordingly depend more largely than reflexes upon the operations of the higher brain centres. If the activity involves a number of acts, each one of which, considered singly and alone, is relatively useless, but all of which taken together lead up to some adaptive consequence, such as the building of a nest, the feeding of young, etc., it will be safe to call the action instinctive. The difference thus pointed out is founded theoretically upon the nature of the functions subserved by the two types of action, their relative immediacy, generality, etc. It sometimes reduces in practice to a mere difference apparently of degree or complexity, and will be found on further examination to involve, generally at all events, a difference in the intra-organic conditions leading to the two forms of reaction. It must be frankly confessed, however, that many cases are discoverable in which all distinctions seem arbitrary and fictitious. Too much stress should not be laid, therefore, upon the matter of ultimate differences. It is rather upon the identity of service to the organism that the emphasis should fall, with the added recognition that such service may be rendered in thousands of ways, whose interrelations may well baffle our clumsy and ill-informed attempts at classification.


Source:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AreWeWinning

Similar threads

MonkeyButter
Replies
0
Views
137
Suicide Discussion
MonkeyButter
MonkeyButter
SyntheticDozen
Replies
8
Views
552
Suicide Discussion
Passenger4224
Passenger4224
kirillbledny
Replies
37
Views
1K
Suicide Discussion
Intoxicated
Intoxicated
salai
Replies
6
Views
325
Suicide Discussion
Somewhat Suicidal
Somewhat Suicidal
hellohowareyou
Replies
20
Views
417
Suicide Discussion
ctb_warrior
ctb_warrior