It's drop-dead easy for me to commit suicide. Not so easy for most others. In fact, it'd be moral for me to gently and lovingly help people ctb, so some poor train driver doesn't have to. I could dispose of their body, so some hotel cleaning lady doesn't have to stumble upon it. Win-win for everyone, except me. But no, that'd just be too simple and humane, wouldn't it? Exposes me to massive risk. I could take all the trauma onto myself. But as it stands, I'd risk being thrown into hell on earth
So what's the predictable consequence? They jump off a building, maybe landing on someone. Or jump in front of a train, or god knows what
And we can wag our fingers all we want. Opine about the morality. But that accomplishes very little
Because we're dealing with brains crumbling after years of fight-or-flight. Suicidal people who observe that moral calculations are irrelevant in a world that'll stop existing for them; that the trauma they may cause no longer outweighs their own intolerable trauma of living
As usual, shoving the responsibility on those least able to bear it. Of course, if we really care about this, there's many things we can do. For example, it's easier to preempt suicide than to deal with a fully suicidal person. Many work on this, improving people's lives so we have fewer people ask silly things like "How do I decapitate myself under a train?"
Forcing others to do things, especially without their consent, is a form of abuse. (And I shouldn't have to explain that it's not okay to abuse someone because you're in a lot of pain.)
When it comes to nonconsensual sex, it's called rape. When it comes to hitting someone, it's called physical violence. When it comes to making unwarranted advancements towards someone, it's called verbal harassment. When it comes to groping someone random, it's called assault. Forcing someone to live when they don't want to, it is deemed cruel.
Sometimes, your desire to die doesn't override someone else's consent, and sometimes your pain isn't more "painful" than someone else's. The consent argument doesn't disappear because you won't live to deal with the consequences.
With that being said, I get what you mean overall. Like I said, I think allowing others to assist others in suicide in a legal means is a good thing. I'm not sure about about you killing them and then disposing their body, lmao, but I think the government should provide humane ways for others out, or allow product makers to ship "suicide" products. Right now you just get charged for selling things for the intention of suicide.
Everything you've stated above is a fine line between assistance and murder, and I don't think we should allow murder under the assumption it was suicide, even in the ideal world of where suicide is easy to accomplish. Allowing official channels to commit suicide will always be beneficial, but allowing someone to shoot you in the head under the guise of a suicide attempt is not inherently beneficial to the society you'd be leaving behind. (Which will continue to exist, whether you're there to experience it or not.)
I'm obviously not here to debate what kinds of "legal suicide" we should allow - I'm mainly here to clarify that just because your brain is "crumbling", it's not someone else's reasonability. Your argument of reasonability can (and does) apply to forms of abuse, and as stated before, I don't think I need to explain
why abuse isn't a vibe.
If you don't understand why it's a form of abuse, then there's not much to say on my end, as I'm not going to start debating what is defined as abuse.