M
MAIO
Elementalist
- Apr 8, 2018
- 835
Man chose to make it barely accessible. It's there. Its just that man makes more money while you suffer than if you were dead.Crappy gift. It's too hard to employ this gift.
A benevolent God wouldn't have filled our lives with suffering in the first place. At the very least, the exit button should be easily accessible and lead to painless no existence. But the opposite is true...
Yes. Life is optional.Stop trying to take away this gift etc.
It's a gift in disguise. What if we will always be trapped? God is a sick fuck who would make you go through this same life over and over just to spite you. I hope I am wrong and hope death is final.Stop trying to take away this gift etc.
'But ... but muh feelings will get hurt.'Euthanasia needs to be a universal human right. I don't understand how you can have natalism without the right to die and call it a fair system. If you're going to gamble by creating life, then that sentient being should be able to decide wether or not to tap out peacefully once they become adults.
Crappy gift. It's too hard to employ this gift.
A benevolent God wouldn't have filled our lives with suffering in the first place. At the very least, the exit button should be easily accessible and lead to painless no existence. But the opposite is true...
no animals commit such atrocities as humans do, in my hierarchy we are under animals,at least they act based on their instints, people impose cruelty and suffering onto other fellow human beings (or animals) sometimes only out of sheer pleasureTheir is no God. And why would God have to care about people? People are so egotistical. We are just animals not these special beings of light that are the entire point of the universe.
Screw money and the systemMan chose to make it barely accessible. It's there. Its just that man makes more money while you suffer than if you were dead.
trueIf suicide is the best gift from God then survival instinct is the worst possible gift he's ever given to mankind.
Yep I agree :)Crappy gift. It's too hard to employ this gift.
A benevolent God wouldn't have filled our lives with suffering in the first place. At the very least, the exit button should be easily accessible and lead to painless no existence. But the opposite is true...
Stop trying to take away this gift etc.
no animals commit such atrocities as humans do, in my hierarchy we are under animals,at least they act based on their instints, people impose cruelty and suffering onto other fellow human beings (or animals) sometimes only out of sheer pleasure
Doing it should be as easy as just thinking it.
"Damn, I hate life and wish I was dead." POW, wish granted.
If there were less people then this world would get so much better for the people remaining. The way it is now we are just slaves to the corporate rulers.Man chose to make it barely accessible. It's there. Its just that man makes more money while you suffer than if you were dead.
Exactly nobody ever asked to be born we just were and then we should have the right to die.Euthanasia needs to be a universal human right. I don't understand how you can have natalism without the right to die and call it a fair system. If you're going to gamble by creating life, then that sentient being should be able to decide wether or not to tap out peacefully once they become adults.
Humans are animals. To say that other animals "only act based on instinct" is absurd. Humans aren't the only animal to intentionally inflict suffering on others.no animals commit such atrocities as humans do, in my hierarchy we are under animals,at least they act based on their instints, people impose cruelty and suffering onto other fellow human beings (or animals) sometimes only out of sheer pleasure
selfishness.If there were less people then this world would get so much better for the people remaining. The way it is now we are just slaves to the corporate rulers.
Humans are animals. To say that other animals "only act based on instinct" is absurd. Humans aren't the only animal to intentionally inflict suffering on others.
this!This depends on your definition of "intention". I suspect that almost all (non human) animals inflict suffering without intent (they intend to eat a meal, killing the prey and making it suffer is a side-effect). There are humans that inflict suffering on others because they intend to inflict the suffering itself.
This depends on your definition of "intention". I suspect that almost all (non human) animals inflict suffering without intent (they intend to eat a meal, killing the prey and making it suffer is a side-effect). There are humans that inflict suffering on others because they intend to inflict the suffering itself.
Nope, actually there are animals that inflict pain on others for pleasure. It's a trait found in more intelligent animals. For example orcas will do this.this!
No animal in nature (that I know of) goes out of it's way to deliberately weaken, torture, or kill another animal for strictly pleasure like humans do. You'll never see an animal torture and rape it's prey to near death, then revive it just to do it over again and again. Creatures do it for the purpose of survival. Humans are the only things that will go against logic and survival just to inflict unnecessary suffering.
Humans reminds me of this story!
"A scorpion asks a frog to carry him over a river. The frog is afraid of being stung, but the scorpion argues that if it did so, both would sink and the scorpion would drown. The frog then agrees, but midway across the river the scorpion does indeed sting the frog, dooming them both. When asked why, the scorpion points out that this is its nature."
Moral of the story always fight your baser instincts, your selfishness, your greed, your self-destructive inner impulse, or what have you, because it not only hurts others but yourself as well.
Nope, actually there are animals that inflict pain on others for pleasure. It's a trait found in more intelligent animals. For example orcas will do this.
GoingSoonish said:I suspect that almost all (non human) animals inflict suffering without intent (they intend to eat a meal, killing the prey and making it suffer is a side-effect)
Yeah I saw that. I was mainly replying to bigj5I didn't indicate otherwise:
I didn't know Orcas did that. Is it for pleasure out of strictly torturing them or is it a form of play that actually benefits their survival for when they do hunt?Nope, actually there are animals that inflict pain on others for pleasure. It's a trait found in more intelligent animals. For example orcas will do this.