Thanks for the reply on this.
I am no chemist but have been looking into as much information as possible to try to give the most reliable info that I can. Forum members with aptitude for research and/or chemistry are also welcome to add to the combined knowledge of the forum to help with this aim.
I'll start with the disclaimer that I'm in the same boat regarding chemistry, but research is among my stronger suits. I have been looking into this independently and have also hit a wall finding anything
definitive, which is what I would prefer when making decisions about whether or not I will die and think all members deserve as robust and well-sourced a body of information as possible on the matter. Hopefully someone with more expertise comes along sooner than later.
Unless you are claiming that the table salt is preventing the nitrite and nitrate in that curing salt mix from degradation, then the original phrasing still describes high stability over an indefinite time if stored properly. While the statement is made in the context of meat curing, that context does not change the underlying chemistry, and it still supports that sodium nitrite does not undergo meaningful degradation and therefore has no practical expiration date when stored properly.
What I was getting at there is that since the ingredient which is by far the primary constituent of Prague powder is something which does not expire, saying
Prague powder by extension doesn't expire is a sound inference, but saying so about pure sodium nitrite is not.
We need to consider the amount when it comes to the purpose: for us, SN is to kill us. For curing, it's to
preserve the color of meat, as
noted by Tasting Table. Yes it also states it's to inhibit the growth of bacteria but salt alone accomplishes that.
Cultures across time and place have known this and used it as such for hundreds or thousands of years. As noted in
Vizzy's SN Bible (among other places), purity is
extremely important and ought to be 95%
minimum. Something tells me if the sodium nitrite in Prague powder were to degrade to a lower relative concentration of 5.8%, it would probably still do a fine job of color retention.
It's possible that article or link has been removed/changed.
Perhaps it can be changed or updated, ideally with an archived version of whatever page were to take its place.
it seems as though there is not much information discussing ambient storage because the 'knowledge' is taken for granted across the industry that SN is stable, so research on degradation etc only takes place in extreme temperatures and conditions.
Again, comparing our purposes—"the industry" is the chemical industry, where labs, sellers, and storage methods are reputable and quality-controlled, vs.
guys possibly hanging out on the forum to peddle their home-cooked wares. Anyone who's not bought from an industrial/scientific source has absolutely
no idea about the conditions of their product before it reached them, nor any way of finding out. The chemicals could well have been left exposed to open air for any period of time, ultimately shortening their shelf life.
Data sheets like the one linked below do not have expiry dates, just that storage should be in a cool, dry place (Section 7) and that the shelf life is indefinite (Section 10). The absence of an expiry duration or warning of time-limited stability seems to inform the industry that expiry in ambient conditions is not considered an issue, with only hygroscopicity noted as a concern.
Sodium Nitrite â–ş Flinn Scientific SDS Sheets â–ş Learn health and safety information about chemicals.
www.flinnsci.com
This is helpful and good to see, though cf. my previous point re: pratfalls of equating reputable industrial sources with sketchbags like DMC who
send "Happy New Years" texts to prospective clients he's eager to
kill sell to.
As addressed above earlier, the author of that photo wish to remain anonymous and I respect that but I have verified them.
However I did ask them if they could do another test, and this was the result:
View attachment 192845
This is a much more informative photo and if it was provided directly to mods on request by a known source, that's about as good as we can get. As before, if the original post could be updated with this photo and the relevant context (including the age of this batch of SN, unless it's the same one), I think that would only serve to boost its credibility.