Method Speeding and Crashing as a method?

[ButterToast]

What do you guys think of speeding 200kmph+ / 120mph+ or higher, no seatbelt, and then intentionally crashing on an empty highway to make it seem like an accident? Still dumb accident but better for others since its not suicide?

 

[DeathSweetDeath]

It may work, on the other hand, it may not turn out the way you think. And there are two such cases I've heard of where it was fatal & didn't hurt anyone else, but nobody believed it was an accident.

 

[Bishop]

It may work, on the other hand, it may not turn out the way you think. And there are two such cases I've heard of where it was fatal & didn't hurt anyone else, but nobody believed it was an accident.

Yikes

 

[Hollowman]

If I tried that I'd remove all the airbags.

 

[SkeletonFlower96]

If I tried that I'd remove all the airbags.

Definitely not will be seen as an accident

 

[Hollowman]

Definitely not will be seen as an accident

Forget about that part lol

 

[COP2CON]

Many things you dont think about give away whether it was intentional or a normal wreck (there's essentially no such thing as a traffic "accident", someone's always at fault) such as yaw marks, point of impact, vehicle condition/modifications, etc. Also, I've been to many high speed crashes and depending on many factors, if you survive its not a great survival. I went to at least 1000 wrecks from minor to major, and I still never had a fatality wreck. Mainly because I was able to help bring back a guy at one of them but still. The statistics are not in your favor my friend from my personal experience.

Glossary of Terms for Crash Reconstruction

 

[fadedghost]

What do you guys think of speeding 200kmph+ / 120mph+ or higher, no seatbelt, and then intentionally crashing on an empty highway to make it seem like an accident? Still dumb accident but better for others since its not suicide?

This is terribly irresponsible and a horrible idea. Either it's daytime, and then a highway is unlikely to be empty, or it's late at night and a tired driver might not see the wreckage before it's too late. Don't attempt in a way that's going to destroy others. There are plenty of other methods that won't be as likely to hurt other people.

 

[ButterToast]

This is terribly irresponsible and a horrible idea. Either it's daytime, and then a highway is unlikely to be empty, or it's late at night and a tired driver might not see the wreckage before it's too late. Don't attempt in a way that's going to destroy others. There are plenty of other methods that won't be as likely to hurt other people.

good point

Many things you dont think about give away whether it was intentional or a normal wreck (there's essentially no such thing as a traffic "accident", someone's always at fault) such as yaw marks, point of impact, vehicle condition/modifications, etc. Also, I've been to many high speed crashes and depending on many factors, if you survive its not a great survival. I went to at least 1000 wrecks from minor to major, and I still never had a fatality wreck. Mainly because I was able to help bring back a guy at one of them but still. The statistics are not in your favor my friend from my personal experience.

Glossary of Terms for Crash Reconstruction

Good to know

 

[StoneCactus]

I've actually considered doing something like that riding a motorcycle without a helmet. What are the odds it would kill me? No crumple zones on a bike...

 

[ButterToast]

I've actually considered doing something like that riding a motorcycle without a helmet. What are the odds it would kill me? No crumple zones on a bike...

This one makes more sense, just wear minimum gear and if you crash at fast enough speed, almost guaranteed death.