H
HannibalLector
Student
- Jul 5, 2018
- 161
I don't quite understand what you mean. Is SN considered ineffective?You couldnt be serious, all that planning for the least effective methods sounds like bullshit.
I don't quite understand what you mean. Is SN considered ineffective?
I don't quite understand what you mean. Is SN considered ineffective?
Single cases aren't representative of the entire method at all. Yes, you might survive 40 hours after SA, just as much as your body may naturally overcome the effects of SN for some reason. All the more chemical methods' success depend on how your body reacts to them, and it's a risk you have to take. On the other hand, pleople may pick SN over SA because of it's availability, because we've gathered more information on it, because they knew someone who pulled through this method, which most people on this forum do, or maybe because they don't want to handle a potentially explosive substance that poses danger to other people even after their deaths.Well considering Nitschke says: "You dont have to make azide more powerful and more effective because its pretty damm effective in its full strength as it is. But you might wanna speed up your nitrite and perhaps lower the quantities a bit and its relatively straight forward." (source: "NuTech Toronto Oct 2017 Dr Nitschke discusses the use of lethal inorganic salts for euthanasia" video)
The powerful and effective sodium azide can be compared with the reality, check out my post (link below). Seems like Nitschkes fiction beats reality. Unless you consider surviving 40 hours on azide powerful and effective.
https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/azide.1575/#post-19003
So if sodium nitrite is less powerful and effective then azide, SN sounds like an ordeal.
Single cases aren't representative of the entire method at all. Yes, you might survive 40 hours after SA, just as much as your body may naturally overcome the effects of SN for some reason. All the more chemical methods' success depend on how your body reacts to them, and it's a risk you have to take. On the other hand, pleople may pick SN over SA because of it's availability, because we've gathered more information on it, because they knew someone who pulled through this method, which most people on this forum do, or maybe because they don't want to handle a potentially explosive substance that poses danger to other people even after their deaths.
Sadly, the peaceful pill doesn't and may never exist, so every method is bound to fail sometimes, even with the utmost precaution.
Well considering Nitschke says: "You dont have to make azide more powerful and more effective because its pretty damm effective in its full strength as it is. But you might wanna speed up your nitrite and perhaps lower the quantities a bit and its relatively straight forward." (source: "NuTech Toronto Oct 2017 Dr Nitschke discusses the use of lethal inorganic salts for euthanasia" video)
The powerful and effective sodium azide can be compared with the reality, check out my post (link below). Seems like Nitschkes fiction beats reality. Unless you consider surviving 40 hours on azide powerful and effective.
https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/azide.1575/#post-19003
So if sodium nitrite is less powerful and effective then azide, SN sounds like an ordeal.
Hey, where does he say this exactly? is it in the PPH or in a video?
Video at 17:03
I'm not sure if it's fair to directly compare nitrite and azide like that and to just assume that lower reliability means that it's a "weaker" substance. Nitrite isn't just a weaker version of azide. It kills by converting hemoglobin to methemoglobin, while azide prevents the cells from undergoing metabolism. I don't have a lot of knowledge when it comes to neither chemistry nor medicine, but I would think that it's possible that there could be a big difference in how the two processes are experienced.
Some methods have different cause of death, but we need tools to asses and compare methods. That is the reason Nitschke use the Exit Reliability & Peacefulness Test.
The Exit RP Test
"Many end of life options are discussed in this book and it can be a daunting project trying to distinguish or compare the relative advantages or shortcomings of on one over the other. To simplify the process, we have developed a simple rating system that can be applied to all end of life methods." "The higher the number, the more reliable and peaceful the method in question."
Reliability (R-10)
"Reliability has been consistently identified as a major important factor in assessing end of life methods. A seriously ill person wanting to end their life needs to know the method will work. No one wants to take chances with a method that might work. Reliability is essential."
(PPeH)
When i choose method i prefer method that is reliable with fast delivery. We might have different preferences but few of us wants endure prolonged suffering and end up as a vegetable.
Based on Nitschkes explanation i interpretate 10/10 as the most reliable (low failure rate) and 1/10 not reliable. 7 out of 10 for sn means that sn has higher failure rate then a method that score 10/10 for reliability.
Conclusion
So either the cause of death by converting hemoglobin to methemoglobin isnt effective means of induce death in humans or sodium nitrites does a poor job converting hemoglobin to methemoglobin.
Sure, but we don't know what goes into that rating. Does it mean that 7/10 subjects in a laboratory setting (no antidote, high dose, etc.) would die, or do they take other things into account? For example, in the vimeo video he specifically addresses how azide has no antidote, while nitrite does. Could it be that the success rate under laboratory conditions is actually higher than 7/10, but that he detracts one or several points because of the antidote? If that was the case, nitrite would be as effective for someone who has a low likelihood of being saved.
What I was talking about earlier was the statement "So if sodium nitrite is less powerful and effective then azide, SN sounds like an ordeal", which to me sounds like you equate a lower reliability rating to the drug being less powerful, in the sense that it takes longer to work and is more painful. As I explained above, that is not necessarily true - although it could be.
Unfortunately it seems like its not single cases of prolonged suffering with sodium azide, rather the opposite:
The study im refering to is a review of the literature from 1927 to 2002 on human exposure to sodium azide and its health effects. Meaning that they have looked at all known cases of sodium azide during that period.
"More severe and fatal toxic effects had later onsets within a range
of an hour to several days. These effects included hypothermia,
seizure, coma, cardiac arrhythmia associated with electrocardiogram
(EKG) changes, chest pain, pulmonary edema, oliguria,
metabolic acidosis, and cardiopulmonary failure."
"All individuals with hypotension
for more than an hour died."
https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/azide.1575/#post-19003
Honestly i havent seen a single case of sodium azide where the experience is quick and peaceful like Nitschke suggests with words like powerful and effective. But sodium azide seems to be a very reliable method, and there is no antidote.
Reliability of the salts
Sodium cyanide 10/10
Sodium azide 9/10
Sodium nitrite 7/10
To summarize
Sodium cyanide is painful but it delivers death in 2-5 minutes. Very reliable.
Sodium azide delivers death within hours according to the scientific articles i have seen, with unpleasant symptoms. Very reliable.
Sodium nitrite is less powerful then sodium azide and scores only 7 out of 10 in PPeH:s reliability test.
Conclusion
I suggest use two methods to make it reliable and peaceful and prevent ending up like a "single case". If "sodium nitrite and carbon monoxide" or "sodium nitrite and nitrogen" is a good combination these could be a wise mans choices.
"Sodium nitrite is contraindicated in cases where carbon monoxide poisoning has also occurred."*
(source: "Chemical Agents
Ian Greaves FRCP, FCEM, FIMC, RCS(Ed), DTM&H, DMCC, DipMedEd, RAMC, Paul Hunt MBBS, DipIMC(RCSEd), MCEM, MRCSEd, DMCC, RAMC, in Responding to Terrorism, 2010")
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080450438000052
*contraindicated referring to a disadvantageous, potentially dangerous manoeuvre or therapy that should not be used due to risks involved.
Just take 20 to 25g then, and good bye worldSodium nitrite and lethal dose and reliability
"HUMAN EXPOSURE STUDIES/ Symptoms of nitrite poisoning and MetHb formation after ingestion ranged from 0.4 to > 200 mg/kg bw, expressed as nitrite ion ... MetHb formation in different cases varied from 7.7 up to 79% ... /It was deduced that/ cyanosis occurred at MetHb concentration above 10%, and other symptoms at > 20% ... /Nitrite" (toxic database)
A deeper look
"2.3.1 Methaemoglobin formation
Nitrite is more toxic to young infants than to adults, due to
the higher methaemoglobin formation in infants (section 2.1.2.2).
Accidental human intoxications have been reported due to the
presence of nitrite in food. The oral lethal dose for humans was
estimated to vary from 33 to 250 mg NO2-/kg bw, the lower doses
applying to children and elderly people (Corré & Breimer, 1979).
Toxic doses giving rise to induction of methaemoglobinaemia ranged
from 1 to 8.3 mg/kg bw (Winton et al., 1971; Simon, 1970). Several
case reports of human intoxication from high nitrite exposure have
recently been published (Machabert et al., 1994; Dudley & Salomon,
1993; Bradberry et al., 1994; Kaplan et al., 1990; Walley &
Flanagan, 1987). The toxicity of nitrite can be induced both from
inhalation (amyl nitrite) and oral intake (sodium nitrite, amyl
nitrite). The approximate intake figures were sometimes reconstructed
from residual nitrite in food products. Symptoms of nitrite poisoning
and MetHb formation after ingestion ranged from 0.4 to > 200 mg/kg
bw, expressed as nitrite ion. Symptoms of methaemoglobinaemia include
cyanosis, euphoria, flushed face, headache, dizziness, ataxia,
followed by dyspnoea and tachycardia, depending on the level of
exposure to nitrite. MetHb formation in different cases varied from
7.7 up to 79%. Patient recovered well due to therapy with methylene
blue combined with oxygen and/or ascorbic acid and in severe cases,
exchange transfusion (Kaplan et al., 1990; Walley & Flanagan,
1987). From these case reports it was deduced that cyanosis occurred
at MetHb concentration above 10%, and other symptoms at > 20%. If no
therapy was immediately applied, concentrations of 60-70% MetHb
were often fatal (Kaplan et al., 1990; Walley & Flanagan, 1987;
Bradberry et al., 1994). Another source of information with
respect to nitrite toxicity in humans is the use of sodium nitrite
as medication for vasodilation or as antidote in cyanide poisoning.
Doses of 30-300 mg/person, equivalent to 0.5-5 mg/kg bw, did not
cause toxic effects (NAS, 1981)."
Other medical source about Methemoglobin Inducers
"The half-life of methemoglobin acutely formed as a result of exposure to oxidants is 1–3 hours. If there is continuous exposure to the oxidant, then the half-life of methemoglobin will appear prolonged. Certain compounds, such as dapsone, characteristically produce prolonged methemoglobinemia.
(toxicology literature, Methemoglobin Inducers)
If you are unfamiliar with the medical term "half-life":
"Half-life […] is the time required for a quantity to reduce to half its initial value."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-life
"Cyanosis is a consistent physical finding and typically occurs when just 1.5
g/dL of methemoglobin is present, which represents approximately a 10%
methemoglobinemia. At 20–50% methemoglobin concentrations, dizziness,
fatigue, headache, and exertional dyspnea may develop. At approximately
50% methemoglobin, lethargy and stupor usually appear; and the lethal con-
centration is probably greater than 70%" (toxicology literature, Methemoglobin Inducers)
Conclusion
Reason for reported failures and scoring low on Nitschkes reliability test could be that humans more effective methemoglobin reductase. I also dicovered that dapsone produce prolonged methemoglobinemia. And that "continuous exposure" of sodium nitrite could possible increase likelihood of successful ctb. And it might be somewhat difficult achieve lethal levels methemoglobin (above 70%) when sodium nitrite ingestion from 0.4 to > 200 mg/kg only reaches methemoglobinemia levels of 7.7 up to 79%.
Just take 20 to 25g then, and good bye world
I dont get it, how can you still be conscious 2-3 hours after had drunk like 30g of SN ?!? This is impossible !It would be nice to see a live stream with higher dosage (50g) and "continuous exposure", maybe additional lethal cocktail (30g SN) every two to three hours while still conscious.
Hannibals prescription
Drink Anti-emetic 30 minutes before taking SN. Then drink sodium bicarbonate dissolved in water shortly before drinking your lethal cocktail of 50g SN. If still conscious after 2-3 hours drink sodium bicarbonate dissolved in water shortly before drink additional lethal cocktail of 30g SN (repeat last sentence every three hours until rendered unconscious).
Potentiating sodium nitrite
"An effective and peaceful death depends on the nitrite overwhelming the restorative enzyme methemoglobin reducatse. The achieve this, rapid gut absorption of the salt on ingestion ca be facilitated by increasing the stomach pH, by taking a drinking 5 gm of dissolved sodium bicarbonate dissolved in water shortly before taking the nitrite solution."
If Nitschke doesnt abandon SN. I wouldnt be surprised to see increase of the dosage in later editions of PPeH. It wouldnt be the first time.
I dont get it, how can you still be conscious 2-3 hours after had drunk like 30g of SN ?!? This is impossible !
I don't think neither of these cases are ideal references. Both subjects ingested fairly small amounts, with the woman only taking one gram (yet still dying!) and the man taking a moderate dose at 15g. Both significantly less than 30g.