Dying Knight
Specialist
- Sep 17, 2023
- 329
When rationally thinking people claim "I know this is true", they actually mean "the probability that this is true is close to 100%". Operating on absolute truth is just impractical, at least because our brain is too imperfect and our conclusions may be erroneous due to glitches. We can't be 100% sure in anything except maybe the most basic things like existence of our consciousness and memories. So people commonly make their decisions based on estimated likelihood of something rather than absolute knowledge.There's just a certain level of irony hypocrisy and lack of self awareness when people claim "I know this is true" and their main reason for it is "because I just know it" and they do the same thing religious zealots do.
Your claims that all knowledge systems are equally bad just because they are based on some postulates don't look valid at all when they are considered more deeply. The predictive strength of different knowledge systems is not the same, it depends on the amount and the quality of postulates. So one knowledge system may be much more superior than other with regard to the quality of conclusions we can derive.
The major difference between existing approaches to making conclusions about the reality may be observed in their success rate of making correct conclusions that may be verified. The typical patterns of thinking used by religious people commonly show a much greater rate of making wrong conclusions than the patterns used in the scientific approach, so it's possible to tell that the quality of different "belief systems" is not the same. The scientific approach proves to be more efficient at making adequate conclusions than other ones.
Last edited: