N
Nicothe13th
Student
- Jan 6, 2021
- 188
UK users: Due to a formal investigation into this site by Ofcom under the UK Online Safety Act 2023, we strongly recommend using a trusted, no-logs VPN. This will help protect your privacy, bypass censorship, and maintain secure access to the site. Read the full VPN guide here.
Today, OFCOM launched an official investigation into Sanctioned Suicide under the UK’s Online Safety Act. This has already made headlines across the UK.
This is a clear and unprecedented overreach by a foreign regulator against a U.S.-based platform. We reject this interference and will be defending the site’s existence and mission.
In addition to our public response, we are currently seeking legal representation to ensure the best possible defense in this matter. If you are a lawyer or know of one who may be able to assist, please contact us at [email protected].
Read our statement here:
Donate via cryptocurrency:
It's not subliminal if you notice it
Ah...so were my father's family.A quick internet search suggests the professor is Catholic.
Also, where is her compassion for the suffering on this forum. Does she think we really have a choice, when for example I am obsessively on this forum, because I am just in so much pain that nothing else is drawing me. What does she think if I was alone with constant suicidal thoughts and misery all day and nowhere to talk about them?
Fuck you Kieren, you ugly pathetic fuck
Man, this obsession with Kieren has really gotten to you. I am definitely not Kieren, because A. I'm in the USA. B. I've been on here before you registered.Because you are him, using his little AI-botnet because he didn't get his way.
You know it and I know it.
So fuck you, you ugly, pathetic, fuck.
Wouldn't bother with it.Have I missed something?
Your days here are numbered, pal.There's a shit load of bots on this platform Mick, and infact the whole Internet now with AI.
But don't believe me, I don't care, I'm right and I know it.
There's a reason males and females are the natural mothers and fathers.
Hold on, lemme replace my emotional chip.....Because you are him, using his little AI-botnet because he didn't get his way.
You know it and I know it.
So fuck you, you ugly, pathetic, fuck.
The chance of you stalking all of my posts to know I've called out multiple bots on here also tells me you're not a real person, because let's face it, you wouldn't be paying that much attention.
I'm chronically ill too and everyday it's a struggle...I don't know if I want to live my life this way. It's so aggravating but I don't think I have a choice.Probably unpopular opinion here, but a lot of these arguments are exactly the same as the 'guns don't kill people, people kill people' line. I'm a gun owner myself but don't buy that for a second. Providing knowledge about SN _for sure_ increases the suicide rate for people on here. There is post after post of I have SI I can't jump / drown / hang, etc. However there isn't much built in evolutionary aversion to just drinking something and it's so easy to get so people just do it.
The question for me is not whether this site causes people who otherwise might stay alive to kill themselves (for me answer is a resounding yes). The real question is whether or not that's actually a bad thing. Should people live in constant pain and misery just because of SI?
I truly feel for this mother losing her only child. I also question whether depression is a valid reason. I see too many posts on here of young people who are like barely out of high school and are like FML I can't get a gf I'm going to kill myself. I was seriously depressed in HS was on meds and then it just went away in my 20s. Chronically ill now and that's my reason, but is it truly valid? I know people who have soldiered on with miserable diseases for decades and decades.
None of this stuff is cut and dry to me, I think free speech is important and should be allowed but it comes at a cost.
I don't even know why "children" are being brought up in this case. He was 27, far from a child in any sense. Such slander.
SAN ANTONIO
"Mikael was a gentle soul," grieving mother Ruth Scott says.
In his last photo ever taken, Mikael Scott is looking ahead pensively. He battled depression for years. Around Christmas, his mother says his mood took a turn.
"He stopped talking as much," Ruth remembers. "He would cry a little bit more. I noticed he was always on his phone - and he did not have social media - so it was like he was always checking in or something."
She's a nurse from Schertz. She had just worked a long overnight shift when she got home, checked on Mikael and made the worst discovery a mother could ever make. Mikael, just 27, had taken his own life.
"My only son just died," Ruth says while sobbing. "He was my life. I lived and died by that child."
The next few hours were a blur: paramedics, police and a pursuit for answers.
"I see that bottle right there," Ruth says while pointing to a large white bottle.
The mysterious bottle by the bed took Ruth on a dark journey to a dark corner of the web.
"I did not know that websites existed out there that promote - desperate people, even children - they promote it and they glorify killing yourself," Ruth says through tears.
Her son was a member of Sanctioned Suicide. We're naming it so parents know what to look for on their children's devices.
The website describes itself as a "pro-choice" forum to talk about mental illness and suicide where you can "ask questions you can't ask anywhere else."
Since the Trouble Shooters started looking into the site, it's hopscotched around the web - but still available, if you know where to look. A welcome note says: "Pro-choice means that we do not encourage you to do anything.
The site's administrators did not return our request for an interview or statement.
While there are recovery threads like one saying the site saved someone's life, the post from people contemplating suicide are chilling.
We found one called, "Best way to hang yourself?" A commenter gave advice, then wrote: "That is how you succeed."
A popular topic is SN, or sodium nitrite. It's a preservative for deli meat, turned suicide cocktail.
And it's what was inside the bottle Ruth found by Mikael's bed.
"Minute by minute, his symptoms as he was dying," Ruth reads from a sodium nitrite thread.
She holds the website directly responsible for Mikael's death.
"That was the gun and sodium nitrite was the bullets," Ruth says.
Kelli Wilson from Houston found the website open on her 18-year-old son's phone.
"After he had taken his own life," Wilson remembers. "People are dying on this every single day. The question that I have is, why aren't they removing it?"
She now leads a coalition of families across the world impacted by the website who all want it shut down.
That's easier said than done, because of a law called Section 230.
"I think Section 230 is, in some ways, more powerful than the First Amendment," Wilson says.
It was written in 1996 when the internet was in its infancy. It means websites don't have to meet the same standards as traditional publishers like newspaper or television.
"The theory was, the internet was going to serve as like a bulletin board where people could post things. You don't have the right to sue somebody who creates the bulletin board for the things that other people post that are offensive," explains Professor Bill Piatt from St. Mary's University School of Law.
The once-obscure law is now a political flashpoint. Former President Donald Trump wanted Section 230 repealed when websites like Twitter posted editorial warnings about, or removed, his content instead of leaving the messages unfiltered.
"So there is concern that if, well look if they are exercising some editorial control taking things down, why can't they be held liable as if they were an editor?" Prof. Piatt says.
The 26 words of Section 230 are considered the 26 words that created the internet. That's why Wilson is calling her movement Fix The 26, to hold websites like Sanctioned Suicide accountable in court.
"Because it's virtual, I feel like somehow crime has become legal," Wilson says.
While both sides of the aisle find the law problematic, there's not much appetite in Congress to rewrite it.
"I can tell you that I've spoken with many Senators about this and I get a lot of interest at first. I've had very long and lengthy conversations with them. And really nothing happens," Wilson says.
Back in Schertz, Ruth is still raw with grief. She sees names on the website crossed out: a signal sent out in cyberspace the deed was done. Someone else is now dead.
"Unless the laws are changed, this is going to keep going," Ruth says. "There has to be a line, okay? There has to be a line that you don't cross. I do not want anybody else to lose their child to this nonsense."
You can't reach people like her - regardless of how much logical statements you throw at them. Imagine if someone said "it's not my fault I'm overweight - it's the cake-makers fault for making cakes so tasty", you'd just have to roll your eyes, and move on.She wholly blames the existence of the forum and the users within on the cause of her son's death...
This probably made her son's suicide much harder for her and explains some of the statements (she could heal others but not her own son)She looks like she has a very busy life, she's a nurse at the local hospital.
"The theory was, the internet was going to serve as like a bulletin board where people could post things. You don't have the right to sue somebody who creates the bulletin board for the things that other people post that are offensive," explains Professor Bill Piatt from St. Mary's University School of Law.
What was Mikael's username?It makes me throw up in my mouth when people direct ire toward the site instead of looking at the whole thing as their own failure. I am pretty sure I know exactly who this was, and the mother doing the bitching about the site actually, by not being supportive of the person was the mother who did the pushing through her hate and inability to accept, support or even try to understand. Then it happens and they blame a website instead of themselves.
Never seen a post here encouraging or glorifying suicide. I guess the mother would have preferred her adult son live in absolute intolerable misery or attempt suicide ill informed so he developed brain damage...
SAN ANTONIO
"Mikael was a gentle soul," grieving mother Ruth Scott says.
In his last photo ever taken, Mikael Scott is looking ahead pensively. He battled depression for years. Around Christmas, his mother says his mood took a turn.
"He stopped talking as much," Ruth remembers. "He would cry a little bit more. I noticed he was always on his phone - and he did not have social media - so it was like he was always checking in or something."
She's a nurse from Schertz. She had just worked a long overnight shift when she got home, checked on Mikael and made the worst discovery a mother could ever make. Mikael, just 27, had taken his own life.
"My only son just died," Ruth says while sobbing. "He was my life. I lived and died by that child."
The next few hours were a blur: paramedics, police and a pursuit for answers.
"I see that bottle right there," Ruth says while pointing to a large white bottle.
The mysterious bottle by the bed took Ruth on a dark journey to a dark corner of the web.
"I did not know that websites existed out there that promote - desperate people, even children - they promote it and they glorify killing yourself," Ruth says through tears.
Her son was a member of Sanctioned Suicide. We're naming it so parents know what to look for on their children's devices.
The website describes itself as a "pro-choice" forum to talk about mental illness and suicide where you can "ask questions you can't ask anywhere else."
Since the Trouble Shooters started looking into the site, it's hopscotched around the web - but still available, if you know where to look. A welcome note says: "Pro-choice means that we do not encourage you to do anything.
The site's administrators did not return our request for an interview or statement.
While there are recovery threads like one saying the site saved someone's life, the post from people contemplating suicide are chilling.
We found one called, "Best way to hang yourself?" A commenter gave advice, then wrote: "That is how you succeed."
A popular topic is SN, or sodium nitrite. It's a preservative for deli meat, turned suicide cocktail.
And it's what was inside the bottle Ruth found by Mikael's bed.
"Minute by minute, his symptoms as he was dying," Ruth reads from a sodium nitrite thread.
She holds the website directly responsible for Mikael's death.
"That was the gun and sodium nitrite was the bullets," Ruth says.
Kelli Wilson from Houston found the website open on her 18-year-old son's phone.
"After he had taken his own life," Wilson remembers. "People are dying on this every single day. The question that I have is, why aren't they removing it?"
She now leads a coalition of families across the world impacted by the website who all want it shut down.
That's easier said than done, because of a law called Section 230.
"I think Section 230 is, in some ways, more powerful than the First Amendment," Wilson says.
It was written in 1996 when the internet was in its infancy. It means websites don't have to meet the same standards as traditional publishers like newspaper or television.
"The theory was, the internet was going to serve as like a bulletin board where people could post things. You don't have the right to sue somebody who creates the bulletin board for the things that other people post that are offensive," explains Professor Bill Piatt from St. Mary's University School of Law.
The once-obscure law is now a political flashpoint. Former President Donald Trump wanted Section 230 repealed when websites like Twitter posted editorial warnings about, or removed, his content instead of leaving the messages unfiltered.
"So there is concern that if, well look if they are exercising some editorial control taking things down, why can't they be held liable as if they were an editor?" Prof. Piatt says.
The 26 words of Section 230 are considered the 26 words that created the internet. That's why Wilson is calling her movement Fix The 26, to hold websites like Sanctioned Suicide accountable in court.
"Because it's virtual, I feel like somehow crime has become legal," Wilson says.
While both sides of the aisle find the law problematic, there's not much appetite in Congress to rewrite it.
"I can tell you that I've spoken with many Senators about this and I get a lot of interest at first. I've had very long and lengthy conversations with them. And really nothing happens," Wilson says.
Back in Schertz, Ruth is still raw with grief. She sees names on the website crossed out: a signal sent out in cyberspace the deed was done. Someone else is now dead.
"Unless the laws are changed, this is going to keep going," Ruth says. "There has to be a line, okay? There has to be a line that you don't cross. I do not want anybody else to lose their child to this nonsense."
Well saidThis quote already triggers me to no end. The nerve of these egoistical parents. He was your life??? He was his own person. Its not about YOU. HE has the right to make any decision he wants to and HE was the protagonist in his own story. He was not living to fulfill his duty as your son.
If you wanted to have him around so badly you could have tried to listen to him better and offer to help him as much as he wanted you to and that´s it.