According to The Atlantic:
When racist became common parlance, rapidly replacing prejudiced starting around 1970, it was understood mainly in its dictionary-style definition: "Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior." What sat in the memory is "It's wrong to think people are inferior because of something like their skin color, or to be mean to them because of that."
If one has not lived in the Southern US, it may be easy to say racism doesn't exist or that the word is just a political tool. I moved to the Deep South at the age of eighteen and lived there for seventeen years. The racial hatred and sense of color-based inferiority was rampant on both sides of the fence. Holy crap, the toxicity was an ever-present undercurrent and general overtone, and I will tell stories if anyone wants to hear them, but only if they're asking in good faith and not to bait me. Growing up in Arizona, my dad was a cop, and in general a good guy, very caring about his community, but the bad guys were Black and Mexican, and the jokes, demonization and disdain for cultures related to those races was also an ever-present undercurrent in my home that bred for me feelings of superiority, disdain, dismissal, and fear that I had to do work to understand and remove from my way of thinking, like having worn glasses that warped my perception. After moving to the South, my mother became a more overt racist because the environment supported it and encouraged it to flourish.
Though it's making the rounds on the Internet, it is not accurate that Trotsky invented the word racism. It was first used in the US with regard to Native Americans in 1902. Trotsky didn't use it until 1930. If he used it as a weapon to cause confusion, well, that's what a good manipulator, disinformationalist, propagandist, and/or psyops operative does.
The first recorded utterance of the word was by a man named Richard Henry Pratt, whose legacy among Native Americans and others is deeply contentious. His story illustrates problems with how the word is used today.
www.npr.org
Finally, I detected some subtle shaming in the thread title, and the poll, but I first commented from a stance that it was presented in good faith. However this comment just doubles down on the shaming and taking on the role of victim: "Didnt expect people to have so much disdain for others with a different worldview even if they are always kind." Maybe you have experienced this and I have not been aware of it, so I don't want to negate your experience, but likewise I don't want to be blanketed with an attitude I don't have.
There are people on the forum whose ideologies I disagree with, but when it comes to non-ideological interactions, they are compassionate and participate in mutual support and reciprocity, or, if you prefer, they act "kind." There are others whose ways of interacting I disagree with as much as their ideologies, and that is why I either ignore them or am "unfriendly" toward them, however I always make a point irl as well as on the forum to never "low blow" or "make shit personal," as
@feast or famine said, though it often gets spun that that's what I'm doing, or that I am narcissistic, or just want a following, or enjoy confrontation and am aggressive, or virtue signal, or morally grandstand, or am in some other way acting in bad faith rather than integrity -- that I am dirty. If I act in good faith when I see something in bad faith toward others or myself, I am painted with the stain of "unkind."
Yeah, no.
I feel like the premise of this thread is the same kind of spin, to make others appear toxic who are not, and to be gaslighted into questioning their motivations and beliefs in order to erode their self-confidence and to doubt their sense of integrity and moral worth, because their stance is not "kind," shame-shame. Kind of like someone tells a little girl who stands up for herself to be quiet and go sit in the corner until she can be nice. To me, this thread and the comment I quoted are an effort to bait and drag someone down into the ditch and not only get them muddy, but convince them that they're nothing more than mudslingers themselves. No thanks.
Sincerely,
Good"Unkind/Toxic"PersonEffed