• UK users: Due to a formal investigation into this site by Ofcom under the UK Online Safety Act 2023, we strongly recommend using a trusted, no-logs VPN. This will help protect your privacy, bypass censorship, and maintain secure access to the site. Read the full VPN guide here.

  • Hey Guest,

    Today, OFCOM launched an official investigation into Sanctioned Suicide under the UK’s Online Safety Act. This has already made headlines across the UK.

    This is a clear and unprecedented overreach by a foreign regulator against a U.S.-based platform. We reject this interference and will be defending the site’s existence and mission.

    In addition to our public response, we are currently seeking legal representation to ensure the best possible defense in this matter. If you are a lawyer or know of one who may be able to assist, please contact us at [email protected].

    Read our statement here:

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC): 34HyDHTvEhXfPfb716EeEkEHXzqhwtow1L
    Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9
    Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8
whitefeather

whitefeather

Thank the gods for Death
Apr 23, 2020
519
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Efilismislife and FML_
castler

castler

Enlightened
Jul 11, 2022
1,206
Yes this is nothing new, they've been talking about wireless signals and our health for years. But like with everything else we use on a day to day basis, nothing is good for us including the food u eat.
Some people are concerned about the potential health effects of RF energy from wireless technology. Most studies haven't found any health effects from cell phone use. A few studies have connected RF and health effects, but scientists have not been able to repeat the outcomes. This means that they are inconclusive
Source EPA
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Tortured Existence, Dead Meat and powerofdap
locked*n*loaded

locked*n*loaded

Archangel
Apr 15, 2022
8,447
Yes this is nothing new, they've been talking about wireless signals and our health for years. But like with everything else we use on a day to day basis, nothing is good for us including the food u eat.

Source EPA
Would the government tell the truth?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Efilismislife
Latios

Latios

Experienced
Nov 22, 2020
269
In related news, life is a sexually transmitted disease with a 100% fatality rate.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Drakkamora, foreverfalling, markimobzzdeasui and 1 other person
Efilismislife

Efilismislife

Psychopath family tortured me
May 25, 2021
642
Yes this is nothing new, they've been talking about wireless signals and our health for years. But like with everything else we use on a day to day basis, nothing is good for us including the food u eat.

Source EPA
EPA does not regulate the non-ionizing radiation from wireless technology, and does not maintain expertise in this area. For more information, please visit the links below.

But this is what they said

World Health Organization (WHO)
The WHO studies EMF and RF and invites scientists from all over the world to collaborate on their research.

Key facts
Mobile phone use is ubiquitous with an estimated 6.9 billion subscriptions globally
The electromagnetic fields produced by mobile phones are classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as possibly carcinogenic to humans.
Studies are ongoing to more fully assess potential long-term effects of mobile phone use.

Tissue heating is the principal mechanism of interaction between radiofrequency energy and the human body. At the frequencies used by mobile phones, most of the energy is absorbed by the skin and other superficial tissues, resulting in negligible temperature rise in the brain or any other organs of the body.

Epidemiological research examining potential long-term risks from radiofrequency exposure has mostly looked for an association between brain tumours and mobile phone use. However, because many cancers are not detectable until many years after the interactions that led to the tumour, and since mobile phones were not widely used until the early 1990s, epidemiological studies at present can only assess those cancers that become evident within shorter time periods.


Human health studies are very good at identifying large effects, such as a connection between smoking and cancer. Unfortunately, they are less able to distinguish a small effect from no effect at all. If electromagnetic fields at typical environmental levels were strong carcinogens, then it would have been easy to have shown that by now. By contrast, if low level electromagnetic fields are a weak carcinogen, or even a strong carcinogen to a small group of people in the larger population, that would be far more difficult to demonstrate.

In fact, even if a large study shows no association we can never be entirely sure that there is no relationship. The absence of an effect could mean that there really is none. But just as well it could mean that the effect is simply undetectable with our method of measurement. Therefore, negative results are generally less convincing than strong positive ones
 
KQuotientW

KQuotientW

404: Reason to live not found
Jul 17, 2022
326
We have a brain surgeon in Australia who has spoken about mobile (cell) phone usage and brain cancers. Charlie Teo might be worth Googling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Efilismislife

Similar threads

Dante_
Replies
9
Views
292
Offtopic
Electra
Electra
JesiBel
Replies
1
Views
184
Suicide Discussion
rs929
R