New BBC Article Today about this site. I hope it will never be shut down

[pthnrdnojvsc]

The evil BBC like the evil New york times is trying to get this sasu website shut down which is why they published this article full of lies against this website. and the article will attract more pro-lifers to the website who will act as spies to take down sources for ctb.

this is the New york times reporters and what they did : what kind of an evil monsters are they that they demonize people already suffering extremely as a Death cult luring and convincing vulnerable children to kill themselves. and it's not like they just read the site once no they spent months analysing millions of posts so they know what they were saying is lies because no one was encouraging others to commit suicide much less luring and convincing vulnerable children to kill themselves as the New York times reporters said ( Lies)

This article from the evil BBC is more proof we are living in an extreme suicide prohibition state based on lies. remember the New York times also did an article full of lies against this website. the New York times monsters spent months analyzing millions of posts here and then lied about what people were talking about demonizing this site as a Death cult that lures and encourages vulnerable young people including children and teenagers to kill themselves. those were all lies which shows the Ny times reporters are evil monsters. they wrote that article to get this website shut down and they doxed the creators of this website who had to quit and then others took it on but Marquis the creator of this website is no longer involved because they doxed him and there were videos about him . they accused him of causing the Death of many youngsters and other people.

this is the New york times reporters and what they did : what kind of an evil monsters are they that they demonize people already suffering extremely as a Death cult luring and convincing vulnerable children to kill themselves.

 

[destinationlosangel]

These people do not get it. This site is the reason i am still alive.

 

[ijustwishtodie]

Making ISPs ban this site wouldn't do anything imo as people can just a VPN to easily bypass that issue. Also, one thing I don't understand is as to why people tend to blame the wrong things for somebody killing themselves. They always seem to systematically blame the site or that one person who was being supportive to them during their final moments or something. I never see these people blame society and the current systems in place as the reason why some kill themselves and, yes, some people do indeed kill themselves because of society's demands and so forth.

But no, they instead blame this site which doesn't even do anything but merely talks about a more peaceful way of dying which is SN. This site doesn't even encourage people to die via this method either nor is there any help provided beyond the information presented in the SN megathreads. People still have to find the sources alone, get the other resources alone and attempt alone. They are doing this on their own volition because assisting somebody with suicide is illegal

 

[foreverlanguish]

I hate when news sites like BBC try to give SS a bad name. If they do take this site away, a lot of people will lose their safe space and many more will probably want to CTB more than ever. I feel like this site has done more good than bad and I personally don't want anything upsetting that balance.

 

[Aimiya]

It's that old Correlation vs Causation thing, kinda over it ngl

 

[L'absent]

We need not fear this news. There is nothing they can do to stop it globally.

 

[LittleBlackCat]

Great, not all this again.

 

[Unknown21]

I'm so sick of humans \humanity honestly.

 

[Emeralds]

Also, why would a cyber security expert write a suicide note asking for this place to be shut down and simultaneously be using SaSu info in his suicide?

Someone can be suicidal themself and come on here to research methods that they can use. Just because they use the site for themself doesn't necessarily mean that they approve of the site. This site can be a danger for some people. He may really believe that the site is bad and should be shut down.

Just because someone is suicidal doesn't mean that they think this site is a good place or that they would want to come on here. I know some people who have struggled with suicidal thoughts. Some of them thought this site was ok. But a lot of them thought this site was a bad idea. They said that they were glad that they didn't know about this site when they were suicidal because if they had come on here, they may have gone through with it if they had detailed method information right before them on their bad days.

I forgot to mention that suicide note. I believe it was a lie.

I don't know. Of course no one on here knows for sure. But his family would recognize his handwriting. I would think the police would have tried to verify that he was the one who wrote the suicide note. They would have asked his family for a sample of his handwriting and compared the two. When they contacted the reporters they would have asked his family for a sample of his handwriting too and sent it in to be verified. So he most likely did write the note.

 

[divinemistress36]

Freedom of speech in USA I doubt it could get shut down and even if it did another one would pop up. I understand the family is mad and in a lot of grief. But more needs to be put into mental health research so people dont have to resort to coming to this site

 

[needthebus]

I am so lonely every single day, and if I try to meet new people, I am burdened with the guilt over what my sorrow and possible impending (or delayed) suicide could do to them.

Here I can be me, uncensored, and it alleviates my lonliness. And BBC and the nyt want to take that away from me... fuck both of them.