E
Esokabat
Specialist
- Apr 22, 2024
- 390
NDEs will never provide scientific evidence as they are personal anecdotes. However, when you look at them as a large body of collective anecdotes, the mathematical likelyhood of certain occurrences are so low simply by chance, that one has to contemplate that these are not random. In the list posted by OP, almost every single one of them contains something mathematically extremely unlikely. Examples: Dr. Mary Neal, spinal surgeon, was told during her NDE that her son, out of her 4 children will die within years. She even shared this information reluctantly with her son and her husband, and her son died in a car accident. Dr Eben Alexander, neurosurgeon, has met his dead sister during his NDE, even though he didn't know that he had a sister as he was adopted. He only found out about his sister after his NDE. Anita Moorjani, who went into end stage coma and organ failure due to stage 4 cancer saw his doctor during her NDE, and after she came back from her NDE, she called her doctor by name and recognized him. She also remembered a conversation between the doctor and her husband that took place in a completely different part of the hospital, not near her hospital room, and the conversation was validated by her husband. Tricia Barker was told during her NDE that she will become a teacher even though she came from a very poor family so she was planning to be a lawyer, as she wanted a high paying job. She ended up as a teacher. Or another guy died of COVID and told the message "Tell Madison at the salon; Her grandfather's okay." and this guy did not know anyone Madison, but after a few weeks, he went for a haircut and the young girl at the hair salon is called Madison, his grandad recently died and she was very close to him.I am open and curious about discussions. Also, I don't believe anyone is above another based on their beliefs or knowledge. If my previous post came across as prejudiced, that was not my intention.
There simply isn't concrete, objective evidence that definitively proves Pam Reynolds' NDE experience as true. Her case is primarily documented through testimonies, medical records, and her own accounts.
All anecdotes.
Scientific evidence: zero.
If we assume they are telling the truth, mathematical likelyhood of randomly happening: almost zero.
In the case of Pam R. she clearly saw that they appeared to have start operating on her leg, even though she was supposed to have had brain surgery, so she with confusion was looking at her body from above, she described the brain saw and other instruments, she said something that looked like an electric toothbrush, she described conversations in the operating theater, the tool case for the surgical instruments, what they contained, how they were organized.
In the case of Dr Eben Alexander, he didn't know his biological parents who were highschool sweethearts but he never met them, ended up staying together and getting married, had another child, a daughter, and she recently died very young. So what is the mathematical likelyhood that you have an NDE and your sister is waiting for you there, even though you never knew you had siblings, and later after the NdE, he obtains a photo of his sister and it is identical to the sister during the NDE. Or Dr Mary Neal, who is told that her young son will die young, she had 4 children, and the one that she was told about ends up dying in a car accident.
Anyway, the list is endless.
Every NDE have one.
Just anecdotes.
But what happens when you have thousands and thousand of anecdotes from all cultures, all languages, all ages.
I think at this point it is called data.