• UK users: Due to a formal investigation into this site by Ofcom under the UK Online Safety Act 2023, we strongly recommend using a trusted, no-logs VPN. This will help protect your privacy, bypass censorship, and maintain secure access to the site. Read the full VPN guide here.

  • Hey Guest,

    Today, OFCOM launched an official investigation into Sanctioned Suicide under the UK’s Online Safety Act. This has already made headlines across the UK.

    This is a clear and unprecedented overreach by a foreign regulator against a U.S.-based platform. We reject this interference and will be defending the site’s existence and mission.

    In addition to our public response, we are currently seeking legal representation to ensure the best possible defense in this matter. If you are a lawyer or know of one who may be able to assist, please contact us at [email protected].

    Read our statement here:

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC): 34HyDHTvEhXfPfb716EeEkEHXzqhwtow1L
    Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9
    Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8
S

SamTam33

Warlock
Oct 9, 2022
763
Who better, but the suicidal? lol

There should be obvious limits, but the fact is there aren't and can never be. It's a non-argument OP has there.
Death is literally everywhere you look, if you have the eyes to see. This life is dangerous... none have yet made it out alive, unless you believe some few obscure religious texts...
I guess I keep coming back to the closest neighbor to death: birth.

There are no limits on giving birth. NONE. Apparently, some politicians think it's ok for a 10-year old to give birth. But they wouldn't dare give a consenting adult the right to die.

That's illogical.

If births are unregulated with no restrictions, it only makes sense that death be treated the same. They're two sides of the same coin.

I'd be down for paying a fee, signing some paperwork and observing a waiting period. Anyone under the age of 18 would need parental consent. Just like with most everything else.

Those are the only barriers needed. There could be a "Reason" field on the paperwork, but it would only be used for statistical purposes.

You shouldn't have to justify your death because no one was made to justify your birth.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Per Ardua Ad Astra, Maudlin, TAW122 and 1 other person
Efilismislife

Efilismislife

Psychopath family tortured me
May 25, 2021
642
I guess I keep coming back to the closest neighbor to death: birth.

There are no limits on giving birth. NONE. Apparently, some politicians think it's ok for a 10-year old to give birth. But they wouldn't dare give a consenting adult the right to die.

That's illogical.
10 years old with no income and incapable to take care of their offspring let alone themselves
If births are unregulated with no restrictions, it only makes sense that death be treated the same. They're two sides of the same coin.
You shouldn't have to justify your death because no one was made to justify your birth.
Yeah its ridiculous. Its the root of all the problems in the world. But they need minions, slave, workers, etc etc so they keep telling people to squeezing offspring to work.
Like farm animals
 
  • Like
Reactions: Maudlin and SamTam33
TAW122

TAW122

Emissary of the right to die.
Aug 30, 2018
7,011
I would have to disagree with the OP. The right to CTB is a personal choice and there should be no restrictions except for some safeguards and eventually honoring a person's wish to die. (e.g. Someone who is not of the age of majority in where he/she lives, but will be allowed in terminal or severe cases) By safeguards I mean something to prevent rash decisions, like a waiting period, having a screening/evaluation to ensure the person chose the option on his/her free will (not pressured nor coerced), is not trying to abuse the system, and is making the decision with a clear head (not under the influence of drugs or alcohol), etc. Furthermore, there could be different tracks for the option, such as terminally ill and severely ill gets first priority as they are near death or suffering immensely so the sooner they exit suffering the better (days or weeks). The non-terminal ones will have a longer wait period, but not something that takes years, maybe a few months or so. The chronic but mild cases (both physical and psychological, but mostly psychological) have a longer wait period and maybe a bit more counseling but at the end, if they persistently request for it, it shall be granted (within a reasonable time frame). Finally, the health individual who wishes to go will go but will have the longest wait period and many opportunities to change his/her mind because once one goes, there is no turning back.

Of course these safeguards are just general guidelines, but it is something to start with or work from.

I guess I keep coming back to the closest neighbor to death: birth.

There are no limits on giving birth. NONE. Apparently, some politicians think it's ok for a 10-year old to give birth. But they wouldn't dare give a consenting adult the right to die.

That's illogical.

If births are unregulated with no restrictions, it only makes sense that death be treated the same. They're two sides of the same coin.

I'd be down for paying a fee, signing some paperwork and observing a waiting period. Anyone under the age of 18 would need parental consent. Just like with most everything else.

Those are the only barriers needed. There could be a "Reason" field on the paperwork, but it would only be used for statistical purposes.

You shouldn't have to justify your death because no one was made to justify your birth.
Absolutely, and as an anti-natalist myself, I believe that procreation/birth itself is a net negative because the person coming into existence never had a choice to do so. Also, once conceived, the sentient being is at the mercy of the world and his/her surroundings, people around said person, and also nature itself. Some people can be born in harsh environments, with debilitating conditions, and other horrors that they never asked for. Thus bringing people into this shitty world is a harm done to someone who never has (existed) been.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Maudlin, Efilismislife and redeyepiranha
A

akirat9

エクトリアン
Sep 23, 2022
386
I would have to disagree with the OP. The right to CTB is a personal choice and there should be no restrictions except for some safeguards and eventually honoring a person's wish to die. (e.g. Someone who is not of the age of majority in where he/she lives, but will be allowed in terminal or severe cases) By safeguards I mean something to prevent rash decisions, like a waiting period, having a screening/evaluation to ensure the person chose the option on his/her free will (not pressured nor coerced), is not trying to abuse the system, and is making the decision with a clear head (not under the

that is no different in just out right denying it. this "evaluation " will just make then find some crap reason to deny CTB for said person.
But as a I say, it is just an opinion, that and these "safe guards" in trying to prevent it by any means necessary (coming up with something in such evaluation to not let CTB), none of will change reality, just makes the method of going ever more unpleasant, added on top of my current agony.
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: Per Ardua Ad Astra and Maudlin
TAW122

TAW122

Emissary of the right to die.
Aug 30, 2018
7,011
that is no different in just out right denying it. this "evaluation " will just make then find some crap reason to deny CTB for said person.
But as a I say, it is just an opinion, that and these "safe guards" in trying to prevent it by any means necessary (coming up with something in such evaluation to not let CTB), none of will change reality, just makes the method of going ever more unpleasant, added on top of my current agony.
I don't believe that safe guards should be heavily restrictive, there is a way to make it fair and objective. Also, I believe that having 'sensible' and 'reasonable' safeguards to prevent abuse, fraud, or misuse of the service is a good idea because there is bound to be bad actors. In addition to this, there can be laws and regulations that discourage as well as punish any bad actors that use it for harm on others.

One good example advocating for having some restrictions is question #13 in The Right To No Longer Exist's FAQ. I know not everyone will be on board but having the right (even if delayed as long as it's not unreasonably long or infeasibly inaccessible) at the end is still much better than the current system we have now (which is an all out prohibition on CTB barring some areas and only for terminally ill, near end of life cases).

 
Maudlin

Maudlin

Specialist
Dec 10, 2021
355
I'd be down for paying a fee, signing some paperwork and observing a waiting period. Anyone under the age of 18 would need parental consent. Just like with most everything else.
Lol. Fuck their fees.

It would be nice if legislation codified complete body autonomy, but my perspective is the same. They can't "legislate" away something that's always at arms' reach. They can't "grant" me rights I already have, either.

I'm a hard-headed American, and I like our founding documents which say my rights are God given, not "granted" by the state, and inalienable. It seems body autonomy was overlooked in the Bill of Rights, to our detriment.

If births are unregulated with no restrictions, it only makes sense that death be treated the same. They're two sides of the same coin.
Agreed. This applies as well to drugs people ingest, body modifications, vaccination, etc.
You shouldn't have to justify your death because no one was made to justify your birth.
Well said.

they need minions, slave, workers, etc
Have you seen this:




Look at the date on that video. ugh.
Soon, you'll be picking up your offspring in the frozen section at the market and stuffing it in the baby cooker when you get home. lol

Imagine the industrial operations. Truly a "Brave New World".
The current state of affairs is not based on any sort of humane rationale of caring for the individual. It is a happenstance default based on the culture and politics of the day. It is nothing to be proud of.

Some people are facing a lifetime of pain, a morbid fact that most people do not wish to think about, let alone bring into mainstream political debate. Religious interest groups full of ignorant zeal have much to say about denying bodily autonomy to strangers, and easily dominate debates in the absence of any opposition.

Having a process by which an individual's choice to die can be given consideration over time would prevent the mess of damage from failed attempts, trauma to those finding corpses in various states of decomposition and shock to others in the community who had no forewarning. Individual cases might still fall through the cracks, but at least a reasonable effort would be made by society to support the choices of people with extremely low quality of life.
That's a damn good argument.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: newave3 and Pluto
Jupit3rs

Jupit3rs

"I'm finally going home... to the stars"
Feb 23, 2022
65
If you think everyone would kill themselves if suicide was legal... Maybe that just shows how awful existence is and why preventing birth is more important here, but nobody cares about that. Somehow, the problem is us, the suicidal people. Makes no sense to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Efilismislife
jackie_boy1337

jackie_boy1337

Member
Nov 5, 2022
77
Well, opinions are likes assholes.

We all got one, but it's a good thing we don't all have the SAME one.
 
Efilismislife

Efilismislife

Psychopath family tortured me
May 25, 2021
642
Have you seen this:




Look at the date on that video. ugh.
Soon, you'll be picking up your offspring in the frozen section at the market and stuffing it in the baby cooker when you get home. lol

Imagine the industrial operations. Truly a "Brave New World".

That's a damn good argument.

Omg -_-
like i said
Like farm animals

i saw a lot of advertisement many clinic did to promote breeding even though its very expensive they got a lot of money from it

Everytime i saw that i got sick after i realize they just popping babies and sentence them to all the threats, burden, sufferings, deterioration, etc just for their own ake

i know normies would oppose that so i dont voice my opinion in real life

I thought with the more advancing robot technology it would be harder for human to compete and later birth rate will decrease but i dont know..
 

Similar threads

Catchingdabus27
Replies
1
Views
153
Suicide Discussion
SVEN
SVEN
S
Replies
2
Views
269
Suicide Discussion
SSGreatBristol
S
SilentSadness
Replies
7
Views
493
Offtopic
Namelesa
Namelesa