derpyderpins

derpyderpins

In the Service of the Queen
Sep 19, 2023
1,809
Over the past 6 or so months I've been thinking a lot about existence and spirituality. What do I want to believe, and what do I think is BS. I have difficulty embracing a religion as "truth."

On the other hand, and paramount to this self-journey, I believe:

The human experience is greater than a bag of meat filled with chemicals
This is something I can't get past. I understand that the brain is like a complicated computer. I get that - as far as science can currently explain - we're no better than ones and zeros, but I also feel it in my gut, as a culmination of all of my experiences, that there's a bit more too it, that if you replaced us with identical machines something would be missing.

One thing I've said is that eastern philosophies have been resonating with me. So I read some of what @Pluto has said about self-actualization and the like. I find it to be very interesting and it helps build a base of what may end up being the structure I build on this spiritual experimentation I'm doing. "What is I?" The consciousness being something other than the thoughts and feelings you have, something untouched by time, an outside observer that's also inside in a way.

I also have spoken with @jar-baby about existence. I see he put his profile to private, so I won't dive in too deep, but it's a lot of thought about NDEs and out-of-body experiences. I've had, at points in my life, feelings of dissociation. I believe music is one way of elevating our consciousness to reach somewhere it normally doesn't go. This could be as simple as evoking deeper emotions, but I like to think it is more.

Another piece to my puzzle is Jung's theory of the collective unconscious. Think about different religions, cultures, and beliefs, started in different places throughout the world. Despite being independent, many of the symbols and rituals created in various quests for spiritual enlightenment end up having overlapping characteristics. Jung posed that - and I'm probably butchering this but it's my takeaway - that we essentially share something akin to memories through generations, largely corresponding to "Archetypes," such as a caring maternal figure or an adventurous young knight. Jung believed we would each adapt certain parts of these archetypes, but we also fight with "shadows," darker parts of our psyches that we are tempted to repress rather than face. (If you're a Persona fan like I am, this is the basis of a lot of the lore, lol.)

So, here I am thinking of all these elements that speak to me as I try to come to my own theory and understanding of life. I've also looked into some other takes on paranormal types of NDE experiences, a bit of occult stuff/astral plane thingamabobs, as Persona's deeper lore goes into a lot of dark magic/demon summoning stuff.

What I start to think is, maybe all the religions/beliefs are onto something. Maybe there's something to "supernatural" phenomenon people have experienced, and different cultures were putting labels on essentially the same thing.

As any modern man would do, I hit the books asked ChatGPT to teach me about things. The most interesting possible connection - imo - are Quantum Physics/Mechanics Theory and how it could explain an "unlocalized consciousness." Here's a summary from my GPT friend:

Quantum Theory, at its core, is a framework in physics that deals with the behavior of matter and energy at very small scales—like atoms and subatomic particles. It's built on ideas that challenge our everyday experiences. For instance, particles can exist in multiple states at once (superposition), and their behavior seems inherently unpredictable until measured. There's also entanglement, where two particles become linked in such a way that the state of one instantly affects the state of the other, even across vast distances, suggesting a kind of interconnectedness beyond ordinary space.​
Unlocalized consciousness, in a quantum context, is a hypothesis that suggests consciousness isn't strictly confined to the brain or bound to a single physical location. Instead, consciousness could be a kind of field or wave spread throughout reality, interacting with quantum processes in a way that might explain phenomena like intuition, interconnected thoughts, or even near-death experiences. This concept often links to quantum mechanics through theories like those of physicist Roger Penrose and anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff, who proposed that consciousness could arise from quantum processes inside brain microtubules—a kind of "quantum orchestration."​
With this in mind, I started looking to connect various religious beliefs. We end up having a few commonalities, as expected. Of particular interest to me would be how each belief defines its "other realm," be it heaven, the akashic records, the "astral plane," etc. My idea here is that these are all the same thing, and different people came to understand it in different ways. Another interest is the entities referred to: angels, demons, spirits, fae, etc., and how they fit in with this "other realm." Putting all these pieces together, we'd want to see how we can elevate/move our consciousness to access this "other realm," such as with music, meditation, rituals, etc.

I'm going to have to take a pause here without giving a full analysis, but below is a massive table made with ChatGPTs help.

Category of BeliefShort HistoryNature of the 'Other Realm'Perception of TimeConsciousness / Soul ConceptInterconnectednessPath to Access 'Other Realm'Guides/ ProtectorsTrickstersMalevolent EntitiesNature SpiritsAncestorsBeings of Light
Quantum TheoryDeveloped in the 20th century, with contributions from physicists like Niels Bohr and Albert Einstein. Explores fundamental physical properties beyond classical mechanics.Quantum field, potential non-local consciousnessEternal now, timeless or nonlinear perceptionNot necessarily ever-persistent, but capable of non-local presenceQuantum entanglement suggests interconnectedness across distanceHeightened states, near-death experiences, deep meditationHypothetical enlightened beings or energies that represent deeper universal truths, possibly arising during altered states or within quantum consciousness theories.----Energy-like forms during altered states; entities hypothetically emerging from non-local consciousness interactions.
Akashic RecordsOriginates in Hindu and Theosophical traditions, popularized in the late 19th century by Helena Blavatsky and the Theosophical Society.Cosmic library or field containing all eventsTimeless, with all events existing simultaneouslyCollective record of consciousness, not personal continuationInterwoven records of all human experiencesMeditation, deep spiritual practice, altered consciousnessAscended Masters: Beings believed to have reached a higher state of consciousness and provide guidance to others accessing the records.---Souls held within the records, representing archetypal human experiences.Beings of Knowledge: Enlightened entities that serve as keepers of wisdom within the Akashic field.
BuddhismFounded by Siddhartha Gautama (the Buddha) in the 5th-4th centuries BCE in India. Focuses on overcoming suffering and the cycle of rebirth.Samsara (cycle of existence) and Nirvana (transcendence)Samsara is cyclical, Nirvana is beyond timeImpermanent consciousness with no fixed soulAll beings are connected through karma and dependent originationMindfulness, meditation, ethical living, enlightenmentBodhisattvas: Enlightened beings who delay their own Nirvana to assist others; Protectors like Mahakala who guard the teachings.Mara: The personification of obstacles, temptation, and fear; acts as a trickster to prevent enlightenment.Rakshasas: Demonic entities often depicted as obstructing spiritual progress.Spirits that inhabit Samsara, representing beings undergoing the cycle of rebirth.Reverence for ancestors in some regional Buddhist traditions, particularly in East Asia.Devas: Celestial beings representing enlightenment, residing in higher realms like the Tavatimsa heaven.
Christian MysticismRoots in early Christianity, developing through figures like Meister Eckhart and St. John of the Cross. Emphasizes direct experience of God.Spiritual domain of Heaven or divine unityLinear progression in Heaven, potential sense of timeless unity with GodEternal soul, persistence beyond deathUnion with God and interconnectedness with all creationPrayer, mysticism, divine grace, transcendent experiencesAngels: Divine messengers and protectors; Saints who intercede on behalf of believers.-Demons: Fallen angels or malevolent entities that tempt or attack souls, often representing internal struggles or sin.-The souls of saints and departed holy figures are sometimes venerated.Heavenly Beings: Angels and beings that symbolize closeness to God, embodying light and divine grace.
SufismEmerged within Islam around the 8th century CE, focusing on personal experience of God. Influenced by Islamic mystics like Rumi and Al-Ghazali.Spiritual world of divine love and unityTimeless state experienced in union with the DivineThe soul as a unique entity seeking unity with GodAll souls are connected through divine loveDhikr (remembrance), music, dance, Sufi practices to achieve ecstasy and connectionSufi Masters: Guides that help students achieve unity with the divine; Qutb: Spiritual pole believed to be the highest saint of the age.-Jinn: Spirits that may be either benign or malevolent; lower spirits can also represent trials for personal growth.Spirits of divine creation tied to elements in nature.The teachings often emphasize the connection to ancestors through lineage, especially in certain Sufi orders.Divine Entities: Representations of the divine as experienced through ecstatic states and connection with Allah.
HinduismOne of the oldest religions, developing over thousands of years in the Indian subcontinent. Central texts include the Vedas and Upanishads.Multiple realms (e.g., Devaloka, Vaikuntha), Brahman as ultimate realityCyclical time, reincarnation, transcendent timeless state in BrahmanEternal Atman (soul) that is part of BrahmanInterconnectedness through karma, divine essence within all beingsMeditation, yoga, devotion (bhakti), knowledge (jnana)Devas: Benevolent gods; Gurus serve as human guides.Narada: Sage known for his mischievous behavior, using his antics to further divine plans.Asuras: Powerful beings often opposed to the Devas, representing chaotic forces.Yakshas: Nature spirits that guard treasures and natural elements; Nagas are serpent beings linked to water.Ancestral reverence through shraddha rituals to honor deceased ancestors.Brahman: The ultimate reality and source of divine light, as represented in higher deities and avatars.
KabbalahJewish mystical tradition that began in the 12th century in Provence and Spain. Gained prominence through works like the Zohar.Spiritual worlds (e.g., Atzilut, Beriah) emanating from the Ein Sof (Infinite)Time as an illusion, true reality exists beyond temporal constraintsDivine spark within each individual soul, returning to unity with Ein SofAll souls are interconnected as part of the divine emanationMeditation, prayer, mystical study, ritualsArchangels like Metatron and Gabriel who serve as intermediaries between the divine and human realms.Lilith (in some traditions): A figure with trickster elements, challenging established norms.Qliphoth: Represent the husks or negative emanations, embodying evil forces or spiritual corruption.-Mystical interpretations sometimes include ancestral connections.Emanations of the Sefirot: Representing divine light in ten distinct qualities, each linking to an aspect of God.
TheosophyFounded by Helena Blavatsky in 1875, blending elements of Eastern religions, esoteric Christianity, and Western occultism.Astral plane, mental plane, and higher spiritual realmsTime is multidimensional, higher planes are beyond timeThe soul evolves through multiple incarnations, ultimately merging with the divineAll beings are connected through the collective spiritual evolutionMeditation, study of esoteric wisdom, spiritual disciplinesAscended Masters: Highly evolved beings such as Morya and Kuthumi who guide humanity.-Astral Beings: Lower vibrational entities found in the astral plane, which can influence or challenge practitioners.Nature Devas: Guardians of natural elements like forests, water, and the earth.-Beings of Light: Advanced beings who guide the evolution of consciousness through divine wisdom.
HermeticismOriginates in late antiquity (circa 2nd-3rd century CE) in the Mediterranean, attributed to Hermes Trismegistus. Influential in the Renaissance.Planes of existence (physical, mental, spiritual)Time is fluid, higher planes experience time differentlyThe divine spark within each person, potential for spiritual ascension"As above, so below" — interconnectedness between all levels of existenceAlchemical practices, meditation, seeking gnosis (knowledge)Hermes Trismegistus: The archetypal guide for seekers of alchemical and spiritual wisdom.--Elementals: Spirits associated with fire, water, air, and earth, embodying the physical elements.-Emanations from Higher Planes: Representing the divine spark within, often in symbolic forms through alchemical texts.
Norse MythologyOriginates from Norse and Germanic tribes of Scandinavia. Oral tradition later written down in the Eddas during the 13th century.Nine realms connected by Yggdrasil (World Tree)Cyclical concept of time (Ragnarok as end and rebirth)The soul is complex, with multiple aspects (e.g., Hugr, Fylgja)Interconnected through Yggdrasil, the web of Wyrd (fate)Rituals, sacrifices, shamanic practices (seidr), connection with godsAesir/Vanir: Gods such as Odin and Freya who guide humanity; Valkyries: Spirits who choose which warriors ascend to Valhalla.Loki: The quintessential trickster god who disrupts order and catalyzes change.Jotunn (Giants): Opponents of the gods, representing chaos and natural forces.Landvættir: Spirits of the land, ensuring fertility and protecting specific territories; Elves: Otherworldly beings tied to nature.Disir: Female ancestral spirits that watch over their descendants.-
Wicca / NeopaganismModern religion that emerged in the mid-20th century, inspired by pre-Christian pagan traditions. Popularized by figures like Gerald Gardner.Spiritual plane, Summerland (place of rest between reincarnations)Time is cyclical, tied to nature's rhythmsThe soul is eternal, moving through cycles of rebirthAll life is interconnected through nature and energyRituals, meditation, connection with nature, magic practicesGod and Goddess: Representing the duality of divinity; individual spirit guides may also offer protection.-Malevolent Spirits: Entities invoked as shadows to help confront darker aspects of oneself.Fairies and Elementals: Spirits connected to natural forces, often invoked in rituals.Honored Ancestors: Celebrated particularly during Samhain, believed to be present and guiding.-
Satanism (LaVeyan)Founded by Anton LaVey in 1966 in California. Emphasizes individualism, hedonism, and rejection of supernatural beliefs.No belief in an actual 'other realm,' focus on material existenceTime is linear, focus on the present momentNo belief in an eternal soul, consciousness ends at deathInterconnectedness through shared human experiences, not metaphysicalRituals as psychodramatic tools, self-empowerment practicesSelf as Ultimate Guide: Encourages empowerment through self-realization.Self as trickster, manipulating perception for personal growth.Demonic Imagery: Used as symbols of power rather than worship, representing suppressed desires.---
Goetia and Dark MagicBased on medieval grimoires, such as "The Lesser Key of Solomon" (17th century). Linked to European folk magic and ceremonial traditions.Lower astral plane, demonic or spirit realmsTime varies, often depicted as linear but with the potential for temporal manipulationThe soul can be fragmented, sold, or influenced by demonic entitiesInterconnectedness is hierarchical, involving pacts or dominion over spiritsRituals invoking demons or spirits, ceremonial magic, use of sigilsBound Spirits: Occasionally used for protection, but usually subservient to the magician.Lesser Demons: Spirits that sometimes behave unpredictably, embodying chaos.Goetic Demons: Powerful entities that must be controlled through ritual; often represent human vices or repressed desires.---
Vampirism and Occult PracticesRoots in Eastern European folklore and 18th-century vampire legends. Later adopted by occult groups in the late 20th century as energy-based practices.Shadow realm or dark spiritual planeTime is distorted, perception can become fluid or elongatedEmphasis on energy manipulation, potentially immortal or semi-immortal consciousness through feeding on life forceInterconnectedness through energy exchange, psychic bonds with othersRituals, energy feeding, psychic practices, initiation into occult ordersOccult Mentors: Guides who initiate individuals into deeper practices of energy manipulation.-Predatory Astral Beings: Beings that feed on life force, representing darker impulses or primal drives.---
Celtic FolkloreOriginates from the oral traditions of the Celtic tribes across Ireland, Scotland, Wales, and parts of Europe. Recorded during the medieval period.Otherworld (e.g., Tír na nÓg) with mystical beings and spiritsTime is fluid, with realms often described as timeless or having different flows of timeSouls interact with the natural and supernatural, often with multiple aspectsInterconnected through nature, the land, and ancestral spiritsRituals, offerings to nature, druidic practices, festivals like Samhain and BeltaneTuatha Dé Danann: Deified ancestors and guardians of Ireland; benevolent protectors of land and people.Púca: Shapeshifting spirits with mischievous tendencies, often testing or helping humans depending on their mood.Banshees: Spirits of death, often acting as harbingers or warnings of a forthcoming death in a family.Sidhe: Supernatural beings tied to nature, inhabiting mounds or fairy rings; also includes other fairies.Honored Ancestors: Celebrated during specific festivals such as Samhain, maintaining strong ancestral connections.-
ShintoOriginating in Japan, Shinto focuses on kami (spirits of nature) and has deep roots in Japanese culture, evolving over millennia.Spiritual realms with kami residing in natural elements and sacred spacesCyclical and fluid perception of time, tied to natural rhythms and cyclesSpirits (kami) inhabit all things, creating a sense of unity between humans, nature, and the divineInterconnectedness through reverence of nature, ancestors, and communityRituals, offerings to kami, seasonal festivals, purification ritesKami of Protection: Hachiman (protector of warriors), Amaterasu (sun goddess) provide guidance and protection.Kitsune: Fox spirits, often associated with the deity Inari, act as tricksters with either benevolent or malevolent intentions.Onryō: Vengeful spirits of those wronged during life, capable of causing misfortune or harm.Nature Kami: Spirits residing in mountains, rivers, trees, and other sacred natural elements.Ancestral Spirits: Ancestors are venerated and honored through rituals and ceremonies, believed to guide and protect their descendants.Kami of Purity: Spirits that symbolize purity, such as Amaterasu, embodying sacred and divine light.
TaoismEmerged in China around the 4th century BCE, emphasizing harmony with the Tao (the Way) as outlined in texts like the Tao Te Ching by Laozi.Realms aligned with the Tao, seen as a natural balance of energiesTime is fluid and cyclical, flowing in harmony with the natural orderNo fixed soul, instead a flow of qi (vital energy) that integrates with the universeInterconnectedness through the Tao, the natural order that binds all beingsMeditation, tai chi, adherence to the principles of wu wei (non-action) and natural harmonyImmortals (Xian): Beings who have achieved transcendence and guide practitioners; figures like Laozi are venerated as divine teachers.Trickster Immortals: Playful deities who use humor or mischief to reveal greater truths to humans.Hungry Ghosts: Spirits of the deceased who were not properly honored or have unfulfilled desires, often depicted as restless and suffering.Nature Spirits: Spirits of sacred mountains, rivers, forests, and animals that embody natural energies.Revered Ancestors: Honored through rituals and offerings, forming an important aspect of Taoist practice.Deified Beings: Elevated figures, including ancient sages, worshipped as embodiments of the Tao.
Egyptian BeliefsDeveloped in ancient Egypt (circa 3000 BCE), featuring a complex pantheon and afterlife concepts. Central texts include the Book of the Dead.Duat (underworld), a realm where souls journey after death, guided by gods like AnubisLinear journey through the Duat, culminating in judgment by OsirisThe soul is composed of multiple parts (e.g., ka, ba, akh), which must be harmonized for the afterlifeInterconnectedness through Maat (cosmic order), maintaining balance with gods, nature, and societyRituals, mummification, offerings to gods, recitations from the Book of the DeadGods as Guides: Anubis guides souls through the underworld; Isis protects and aids souls during their journey.-Apep: The embodiment of chaos and destruction, enemy of the sun god Ra; Set also embodies chaos but is sometimes a complex, ambivalent figure.Nature Spirits: Spirits of the Nile, the desert, and sacred animals (e.g., crocodiles, falcons) are revered for their connection to the gods.Ka and Ba: Different aspects of the soul that continue after death, with Ka requiring offerings and Ba roaming freely.Ra and Solar Deities: Sun gods like Ra symbolize divine light and cosmic order, guiding the deceased through the afterlife.
GnosticismEmerged in the early centuries of Christianity, characterized by a belief in secret knowledge (gnosis) for salvation.Pleroma (fullness of divine realms) and realms created by the DemiurgeLinear time experienced by humans; transcendent timelessness in divine realmsDivine spark within each person, trapped in material existenceInterconnectedness through shared divine origin, striving for unity with the PleromaSpiritual knowledge (gnosis), meditation, ascetic practices, and revelationAeons: Divine beings emanating from the Pleroma; Sophia is a key figure representing wisdom and the human yearning for the divine.Demiurge: A flawed, ignorant deity who creates the material world, sometimes acting as a trickster by entrapping divine sparks in physical matter.Archons: Malevolent rulers of the material realm, preventing souls from accessing true knowledge and freedom.-Divine Spark: Each individual has a divine spark that originates from the Pleroma, striving to return to its source.Aeons of Light: Enlightened beings that represent the fullness of divine truth, guiding souls toward gnosis and liberation from the material world.
IslamIslam was founded in the 7th century CE in the Arabian Peninsula, revealed to Prophet Muhammad through the angel Jibril. Central texts include the Quran and Hadith.The afterlife consists of Jannah (Paradise) and Jahannam (Hell), spiritual realms that exist beyond the physical world.Linear concept of time, leading to Yawm al-Qiyamah (Day of Judgment), after which souls enter their eternal abode.Each human has an immortal soul that will be judged by Allah after death, determining eternal fate.Interconnectedness through the Ummah (community of believers) and the belief in divine will.Righteous deeds, prayer (Salah), recitation of the Quran, and following the Five Pillars of Islam.Angels (Mala'ika): Divine beings created by Allah who serve as messengers and protectors; Archangel Jibril (Gabriel) is a key figure in revelation.Iblis: A jinn who refused to bow to Adam, often acting as a trickster by tempting humans away from righteousness.Shayatin (Devils): Malevolent jinn or spirits who seek to lead humans astray.Jinn: Spirits made of smokeless fire, existing in a parallel world, capable of both good and evil.Honored Ancestors: Although not worshipped, respect and supplication for deceased ancestors are common, especially through prayers for their souls.Angels of Light: Created from light, these beings are obedient servants of Allah and symbolize purity and divine will.


I'm curious what other people think of this unified/composite belief theory. Essentially, that there is a "higher plane" that we simply can't explain yet that exists concurrently with us. (Although, something I didn't manage to get into is how time works, which seems to be a big question.) I'd just like to hear thoughts, I guess.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Love
Reactions: PhDone, Regen, Valhala and 6 others
daley

daley

Student
May 11, 2024
175
@derpyderpins , your post covers so much ground, and you put so much thought into it. I don't know where to begin. Most of it is over my head. But you asked so nicely for some thoughts, so I will give it a try. I have some disjointed thoughts in no particular order... Enjoy.

I expect that most people in SaSu do not share your search for something spiritual, that is, that there is something beyond the material. So I am not sure whether post will resonate with many.

I recall from reading some basic philosophical texts that there are three possible positions - materialism (only matter), dualism (there is both matter and a separate spiritual realm) and idealism (only spirtual ??). I believe ( and I am not going to argue in detail because I'm no expert) that there is just one thing. Whether we call this matter or spirit doesn't matter (ha - see what I did there?). My intuition for this is that matter (atoms in particular) is mostly empty space. Matter is more about the rules that govern how it behaves. Where are those rules? They seem like something spiritual to me. Emm... yeah. That's what I got.

Actually, just today I read some posts by Stephen Wolfram about these topics. For example this post describes "the Ruliad" which is kind of the space of all possible computations, and we are somehow embedded in it. And maybe that's all there is. I only get some wisps of what he is trying to say, as it requires some knowledge in computer science and probably I got it all wrong. But he is trying to understand the entire universe using computation.

Regarding your list of religions, I just wanted to mention the Bahai relligion which tries to unify Judaism, Christianity and Islam under a single umbrella. I think you have got enough religions in your table though. So why did I mention it? Not sure. Perhaps I am just showing off...

One other thought, I am a computer programmer, which makes me ( like most engineers ) more easily view things as systems that can be broken apart, but magically work as a whole. Perhaps it makes it easier for me to accept the self as an illusion. But only theoretically. I too share your intuition that "The human experience is greater than a bag of meat filled with chemicals". But I am perhaps more willing to give up on that intuition when I think it about purposefully.
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: Regen, derpyderpins, Pluto and 2 others
Pluto

Pluto

Meowing to go out
Dec 27, 2020
4,015
Merlin siamese quote buddha cat wisdom dalai lama

I've commented on this before from the opposing standpoint, that all religions miss the mark. It's another way of approaching the same issue.

There is, however, a problem with focusing on belief systems. In a best case scenario, the end result will be an intellectual theory that unifies different traditions via some sort of deductive logic. The ideas might even be 'true' at some level. But is this life-changing or beneficial in any way whatsoever?

The paradox of belief is that it starts a process, then it needs to be discarded in order to complete it. An openness to legitimate truth-seeking is imperative to initiate an earnest pathway, but because truth is experienced rather than theorised, all beliefs need to be discarded at some point.

To avoid wasting time, there is a need to choose a respectable facilitator or tradition (for example, Zen) and follow their prescribed process all the way; to join them in an advanced state of consciousness. From that point, it will be very clear what all the truly insightful religious masters were talking about.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: derpyderpins, daley, ms_beaverhousen and 1 other person
ms_beaverhousen

ms_beaverhousen

*can't breathe*
Mar 14, 2024
1,219
*bookmarking the shit out of this*
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Yay!
Reactions: Regen, derpyderpins and Pluto
J

jar-baby

Mage
Jun 20, 2023
509
My beliefs on the subject are similar (well, I hesitate to call them beliefs because in my case they were arrived at mostly by intuitions and personal experience rather than reason or a deeper kind of learning, so it seems epistemically prudent to maintain a measure of (healthy) skepticism)—I do think there's more than a physical world, and that that reality is "higher" in a sense. Those who experience NDEs and sometimes psychedelic trips sometimes describe their experiences as feeling more real than anything they'd experienced before. This sort of experience should not exist in a physicalist world; that is, it shouldn't have been possible for biological evolution to result in such phenomenology.

I also think all (or most) religions draw upon the same underlying spiritual truth that eastern philosophies seem to be best at explaining. But I do think that most religions tend to emphasise adherence to their respective dogma over this spirituality, so I'm not a fan of religion, generally speaking. (I think Pluto outlines other flaws of religion well in the post he linked, too).

I haven't finished it yet but I also want to link this paper that I think is cool because of its academic/rational approach to the question of consciousness and how it relates to NDEs: https://near-death.com/near-death-experiences-solve-the-hard-problem-of-consciousness/.

I also have spoken with @jar-baby about existence. I see he put his profile to private, so I won't dive in too deep,
If you'd like to revisit that exchange or address it that's okay with me—I could send screenshots (including Pluto's words). also I'm a her :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pluto
derpyderpins

derpyderpins

In the Service of the Queen
Sep 19, 2023
1,809
@derpyderpins , your post covers so much ground, and you put so much thought into it. I don't know where to begin. Most of it is over my head. But you asked so nicely for some thoughts, so I will give it a try. I have some disjointed thoughts in no particular order... Enjoy.

I expect that most people in SaSu do not share your search for something spiritual, that is, that there is something beyond the material. So I am not sure whether post will resonate with many.

I recall from reading some basic philosophical texts that there are three possible positions - materialism (only matter), dualism (there is both matter and a separate spiritual realm) and idealism (only spirtual ??). I believe ( and I am not going to argue in detail because I'm no expert) that there is just one thing. Whether we call this matter or spirit doesn't matter (ha - see what I did there?). My intuition for this is that matter (atoms in particular) is mostly empty space. Matter is more about the rules that govern how it behaves. Where are those rules? They seem like something spiritual to me. Emm... yeah. That's what I got.

Actually, just today I read some posts by Stephen Wolfram about these topics. For example this post describes "the Ruliad" which is kind of the space of all possible computations, and we are somehow embedded in it. And maybe that's all there is. I only get some wisps of what he is trying to say, as it requires some knowledge in computer science and probably I got it all wrong. But he is trying to understand the entire universe using computation.

Regarding your list of religions, I just wanted to mention the Bahai relligion which tries to unify Judaism, Christianity and Islam under a single umbrella. I think you have got enough religions in your table though. So why did I mention it? Not sure. Perhaps I am just showing off...

One other thought, I am a computer programmer, which makes me ( like most engineers ) more easily view things as systems that can be broken apart, but magically work as a whole. Perhaps it makes it easier for me to accept the self as an illusion. But only theoretically. I too share your intuition that "The human experience is greater than a bag of meat filled with chemicals". But I am perhaps more willing to give up on that intuition when I think it about purposefully.
Interesting article. Thanks for sharing.

"The first crucial feature of us as observers is that we're computationally bounded: the way we "parse" the universe involves doing an amount of computation that's absolutely tiny compared to all the computation going on in the universe."

I've got a good bit to go but this seemed relevant to me in particular.

I tend to agree with your belief that there is "one thing" rather than material and spiritual separately. I'm trying to think of the Other Realm as something that isn't otherworldy so much as energy in a "space" we can't really observe or understand but is absolutely right here with us and around us. And even that statement brings up questions because of how one might "move" through this space. It's a lot to process and keep straight.

Showing off or not I appreciate the suggestion of Bahai. All the source material I can have is helpful.

I wonder about my"self" so much. I did study engineering before law school, and I'm somewhat decent at understanding computers and code, but I also have this desire for organic, "real" things as well. I can't give up on my intuition about consciousness, but I'm determined to convince myself that it can be explained computationally.

Thank you for replying and keeping the thread going.
 
derpyderpins

derpyderpins

In the Service of the Queen
Sep 19, 2023
1,809
View attachment 153935

I've commented on this before from the opposing standpoint, that all religions miss the mark. It's another way of approaching the same issue.

There is, however, a problem with focusing on belief systems. In a best case scenario, the end result will be an intellectual theory that unifies different traditions via some sort of deductive logic. The ideas might even be 'true' at some level. But is this life-changing or beneficial in any way whatsoever?

The paradox of belief is that it starts a process, then it needs to be discarded in order to complete it. An openness to legitimate truth-seeking is imperative to initiate an earnest pathway, but because truth is experienced rather than theorised, all beliefs need to be discarded at some point.

To avoid wasting time, there is a need to choose a respectable facilitator or tradition (for example, Zen) and follow their prescribed process all the way; to join them in an advanced state of consciousness. From that point, it will be very clear what all the truly insightful religious masters were talking about.
Insightful as always. Thanks for taking the time.

This hits at something that has been an issue for me - and I assume almost everyone who seeks some sort of an enlightenment - about being able to "believe" from the outset. I don't mean this in any bad way, but it's the same feeling as if I'm being grifted. I find it hard to believe that the path works, even if there are success stories, like they are exaggerating/lying to themselves or the success rate is just very low for a reason. I'm not proud that I feel that way, and I really don't want this to come off as an attack on these systems, it's just skepticism out of control.

While I like taking advice from all-over (eg "truth is experienced rather than theorized". I think that hits at the core of what I'm dealing with) I can't shake the feeling that I can't follow any planned path that others have followed or created, it has to be my own.

I think the goal here isn't to logic out a formula for absolute truth (I don't have time to learn all the Quantum Mechanics necessary to play that role) so much as it is me trying to make my own path. That will include fighting my skepticism. So, if I hear "my god is real!," "No mine," "no follow this path to enlightenment" and that makes me instinctively want to reject those doctrines, I want to find a way to be able to essentially "believe" in all of it.

I also get that based on most of the paths out there, this entire thought process is probably moving me the wrong way from self-actualization.
If you'd like to revisit that exchange or address it that's okay with me—I could send screenshots (including Pluto's words). also I'm a her :)
My bad! I'll try to remember that. (I say try in case you've corrected me before and I already failed).

I'd be happy to have an exchange but be warned I tend to send long and rambling messages once I get into things. @LaVieEnRose @Alexei_Kirillov @ms_beaverhousen

My beliefs on the subject are similar (well, I hesitate to call them beliefs because in my case they were arrived at mostly by intuitions and personal experience rather than reason or a deeper kind of learning, so it seems epistemically prudent to maintain a measure of (healthy) skepticism)—I do think there's more than a physical world, and that that reality is "higher" in a sense. Those who experience NDEs and sometimes psychedelic trips sometimes describe their experiences as feeling more real than anything they'd experienced before. This sort of experience should not exist in a physicalist world; that is, it shouldn't have been possible for biological evolution to result in such phenomenology.

I also think all (or most) religions draw upon the same underlying spiritual truth that eastern philosophies seem to be best at explaining. But I do think that most religions tend to emphasise adherence to their respective dogma over this spirituality, so I'm not a fan of religion, generally speaking. (I think Pluto outlines other flaws of religion well in the post he linked, too).

I haven't finished it yet but I also want to link this paper that I think is cool because of its academic/rational approach to the question of consciousness and how it relates to NDEs: https://near-death.com/near-death-experiences-solve-the-hard-problem-of-consciousness/.

I think the experience factor is huge, like Pluto was saying. Truth is experienced. It's the basis for all of this, right? People have experienced weird shit, and while I don't believe every word of the bible or any equivalent I'd be a fool to dismiss the experiences.

Words like "higher," "spiritual," "astral plane," these are all ways for our monkey brains to understand it, imo, because we're so limited to the physical we experience. (Leads me back to @daley 's linked article) We picture it as cloud world (heaven) or fire world (hell) or "higher" and "spiritual" (all magic-y and like space or what not) because - well, many reasons, but - we rely on our internal monologue and visualization.

That's I guess a good summary of what I'm doing here, trying to examine (potential) characteristics of the Other Realm without specifying which exact theory is right or wrong. So far, a few likely pieces:

  • The properties of the Other Realm are not the same as the physical world we are used to. You don't run and jump around there. Movement is likely of the "I".
  • The Other Realm exists concurrently with us. There's no warping or teleporting, it's right here.
  • Getting ourselves to certain what I'd call "excited" states of mind makes it easier for us to peak around the Other Realm, even if we always are tethered back to here. Different people have had different paths to get to and control this excited state.
  • There is something that we experience when we manage to interact with the Other Realm that has historically been given personified representations. (Angels, demons, fae, etc.) My inclination is that this is related to how energy works and flows in the Other Realm, and the personification is - again - just for our monkey brains. I don't currently think there are demons over there with their own thoughts and goals.
  • I would say there is some type of energy flow to and from the Other Realm that is possible. It could work with or be the cause of our natural adrenaline, but I think whatever the "fuel" is for our conciousness (the "I") is linked to the Other Realm moreso than this one.

It's so abstract. I hope this makes some sense and isn't a waste of energy. Thanks for linking the article I'll get to it in time haha reading what everyone has sent me here.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: ms_beaverhousen and daley
Pluto

Pluto

Meowing to go out
Dec 27, 2020
4,015
What you say is constructive at many levels. The sincerity is a very positive sign.

The nature of the topic is that there are many valid pathways, which is why there are masters of all backgrounds, even atheism. Occasionally, people are not even actively seeking truth when they have transformative insights.

This is a double-edged sword, since there are also many pitfalls. For example, there have been teachers who may have a perfectly good understanding, or may have had insights, but are grossly unfit to teach. This is why I try and gauge people's temperament before making any suggestions. It's certainly not a one-size-fits-all.

We also have to consider that there, for example, are over half a billion followers of Buddhism. I doubt even 1% of them are enlightened, or on a serious spiritual path. From what I've seen, people are usually dragged into the tradition of their elders and are obliged to play along. This is a far, far cry from the red-hot determination of the success stories described by Phillip Kapleau.

Anyway, to the point. Yes, your own experience is by far the most important thing. Other people's awakenings mean nothing. The great traditions and celebrated masters are worth zero. In fact, the key techniques generally involve going deeper into your own experience to a place beyond thought.

Your own intuition is the highest teacher, but it needs to be distinguished from doubt-oriented thoughts. The mind tends to constantly mess up the process until we learn to see it for what it is. That is the hard part, and why most people struggle. This is where there is immense value in getting support from someone honest who has been through the process already.

I would not worry about other realms, purely because that is outside of immediate experience (unless it's not) and therefore is merely some sort of thought form.

I'd suggest checking out the work of Dr. Angelo Dilullo. He has a no-BS approach and has helped many people along the path. I'd be interested to know if this resonates. (Of course, this is open to everyone.)
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: derpyderpins and ms_beaverhousen
Leiot

Leiot

Coming back as a cat
Oct 2, 2024
313
Spirituality is coming to know Diety.
Religion is crowd control.

All of the world's religions have good teachings. The difficulty is seperating the spiritual from the garbage people have added to them.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: avoid, PhDone, derpyderpins and 1 other person
timeless001

timeless001

Member
Feb 3, 2024
18
Used to be a hard atheist, but then took some psychedelics and had very mystical experiences that were akin to NDEs. You enter a state of being were it feels like you can look behind the curtain and get a glimpse about the true nature of being. It's also like a dream in that you can't really retain that information for long after you come back down to earth. I had someone transcribing what I was saying during that state and one key insight was that whatever that spritual energy is, religions act like a gateway or interface towards whatever that spritual thing is. So basically all religions are more or less right in that there is something transcendent, but my personal belief is that humans can't ever really know what that transcendental thing is, so all religions are somewhat muddled with things humans came up with. I think gods and spirituality in general are just concepts that humans came up with to make the trancendental somewhat understandable. That's also why I think all those wars over whos god is right are pointless. It's not really about being a devout follower of god, taking psychedelics or meditating for two hours a day. All those things are just a means to connect with whatever the transcendent is. What convinced me that all of this was true is that I was able to obtain information about myself and other people that later turned out to be true. So it must be something more than just getting access to your own subconscious.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Love
Reactions: Leiot, derpyderpins and Demi-Fiend
Demi-Fiend

Demi-Fiend

Bye for Now, Onto Greater Things.
Aug 12, 2024
52
I'd love to write a very thorough and detailed thesis, but my words tends to become a garbled mess and me repeating myself. I always loved getting lost into old metaphysical texts, and wanted to recommend some books and resources to your shopping list.

Hermeticism and Manicheanism are also some interesting old and dead religions/beliefs


This website here offers a lot of different books and manuscripts on Gnosticism, Hermeticism, Manicheanism and Mandaeism:
gnosis.org

If you're also interested in getting lost into lore, Manly P Hall had some great books on the matter, namely Secret Teachings of All Ages.
He also had philosophical lectures on a whole bunch of religions. Checkout the playlists section. My favorite ones is the Hermetic, Neo-Platonic and Astro-Theological courses.
https://www.youtube.com/c/manlyhallsociety

As always, thanks for the informative and engaging content, @derpyderpins
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Leiot and derpyderpins
F

Forever Sleep

Earned it we have...
May 4, 2022
9,508
I grew up more with spirituality rather than religion as such. Most of my family had loose Christian beliefs I suppose- God, heaven, all that. My Nana in particular used to feel she was psychic though. She was certainly right over some things.

I lean more towards atheism now. To be honest, I wish I was an atheist absolutely. It feels like the safer option. Still, I can't shake all of my upbringing.

Like you say- it's more feelings than anything else, plus the mysteries that still remain and, a few weird personal experiences. For example, a dream that actually happened a few weeks or months later. I don't think it was deja vu. I definitely remember I had dreamt it. Which made me wonder about predestiny and whether time is actually linear. I think personal experience is always the thing that feels the most compelling.

That said, I'd be open to hear a more rational, scientific explanation. I also know our brains are capable of f*cking with us. I sometimes 'see' things in the room when I just wake up- that aren't there. Like my dreams are briefly overlaid on reality.

I sometimes wonder if it's all just another evolutionary ploy though. Take a deep feeling of connection to nature. Surely, that would be a good thing to have in terms of survival. We need nature to survive. Wouldn't it be beneficial if we felt the urge to preserve it, rather than destroy the lot? It's a shame we've overcome that one as much as we have...

Strong connections or emotions though- to places, to our community, to individuals. Again- maybe all things that work in our favour when it comes to survival. Sometimes I wonder if it's all real or whether it's just that we find we have these strong emotions and we look for things to put them on.

I don't think it's so different to love. I find I will start obsessing about the most alpha man that happens to be around- limerence. Like, I must be wired to look for that and, I'll just find the most appropriate person to focus it on... and then, deeply regret it.

I just think we as a species have a deep need to know stuff, to feel important, to feel larger than we are in fact- immortality is quite a feat for something so vulnerable! Maybe we just latch on to things that give us what we need. I agree though- the similarities in religions are weird. Especially seeing as people couldn't travel that far in ancient times. I'm not a complete cynic but, I'd also accept that there might be non spiritual explanations for seemingly spiritual things.
 
derpyderpins

derpyderpins

In the Service of the Queen
Sep 19, 2023
1,809
Sorry to everyone waiting on responses after I opened the thread. I was out of town and then (well, currently still am) sick.

What you say is constructive at many levels. The sincerity is a very positive sign.

The nature of the topic is that there are many valid pathways, which is why there are masters of all backgrounds, even atheism. Occasionally, people are not even actively seeking truth when they have transformative insights.

This is a double-edged sword, since there are also many pitfalls. For example, there have been teachers who may have a perfectly good understanding, or may have had insights, but are grossly unfit to teach. This is why I try and gauge people's temperament before making any suggestions. It's certainly not a one-size-fits-all.

We also have to consider that there, for example, are over half a billion followers of Buddhism. I doubt even 1% of them are enlightened, or on a serious spiritual path. From what I've seen, people are usually dragged into the tradition of their elders and are obliged to play along. This is a far, far cry from the red-hot determination of the success stories described by Phillip Kapleau.

Anyway, to the point. Yes, your own experience is by far the most important thing. Other people's awakenings mean nothing. The great traditions and celebrated masters are worth zero. In fact, the key techniques generally involve going deeper into your own experience to a place beyond thought.

Your own intuition is the highest teacher, but it needs to be distinguished from doubt-oriented thoughts. The mind tends to constantly mess up the process until we learn to see it for what it is. That is the hard part, and why most people struggle. This is where there is immense value in getting support from someone honest who has been through the process already.

I would not worry about other realms, purely because that is outside of immediate experience (unless it's not) and therefore is merely some sort of thought form.

I'd suggest checking out the work of Dr. Angelo Dilullo. He has a no-BS approach and has helped many people along the path. I'd be interested to know if this resonates. (Of course, this is open to everyone.)

I will watch and get back to you.

When I say "other realms" I don't mean it literally, necessarily, just a connection of what people think they are talking about across different cultures when they refer to some type of higher plane. It could simply be the self, a timeless consciousness that is observing our thoughts and feelings yet is not comprised of our thoughts and feelings. I will take your advice, though, and try not to overly focus on them/it.

Spirituality is coming to know Diety.
Religion is crowd control.

All of the world's religions have good teachings. The difficulty is seperating the spiritual from the garbage people have added to them.
You mean the spiritual might not actually give a shit if I eat a steak on Friday during lent?

Used to be a hard atheist, but then took some psychedelics and had very mystical experiences that were akin to NDEs. You enter a state of being were it feels like you can look behind the curtain and get a glimpse about the true nature of being. It's also like a dream in that you can't really retain that information for long after you come back down to earth. I had someone transcribing what I was saying during that state and one key insight was that whatever that spritual energy is, religions act like a gateway or interface towards whatever that spritual thing is. So basically all religions are more or less right in that there is something transcendent, but my personal belief is that humans can't ever really know what that transcendental thing is, so all religions are somewhat muddled with things humans came up with. I think gods and spirituality in general are just concepts that humans came up with to make the trancendental somewhat understandable. That's also why I think all those wars over whos god is right are pointless. It's not really about being a devout follower of god, taking psychedelics or meditating for two hours a day. All those things are just a means to connect with whatever the transcendent is. What convinced me that all of this was true is that I was able to obtain information about myself and other people that later turned out to be true. So it must be something more than just getting access to your own subconscious.
This was very interesting and relevant to what I was initially thinking, thank you. I think a good takeaway is that just because the religion might get silly, it is foolish to rush to dismiss all accounts of some type of transcendental experience.

I'd love to write a very thorough and detailed thesis, but my words tends to become a garbled mess and me repeating myself. I always loved getting lost into old metaphysical texts, and wanted to recommend some books and resources to your shopping list.

Hermeticism and Manicheanism are also some interesting old and dead religions/beliefs


This website here offers a lot of different books and manuscripts on Gnosticism, Hermeticism, Manicheanism and Mandaeism:
gnosis.org

If you're also interested in getting lost into lore, Manly P Hall had some great books on the matter, namely Secret Teachings of All Ages.
He also had philosophical lectures on a whole bunch of religions. Checkout the playlists section. My favorite ones is the Hermetic, Neo-Platonic and Astro-Theological courses.
https://www.youtube.com/c/manlyhallsociety

As always, thanks for the informative and engaging content, @derpyderpins
Thank you for the resources and recommendations. I will start to work through them and incorporate them in.

I grew up more with spirituality rather than religion as such. Most of my family had loose Christian beliefs I suppose- God, heaven, all that. My Nana in particular used to feel she was psychic though. She was certainly right over some things.

I lean more towards atheism now. To be honest, I wish I was an atheist absolutely. It feels like the safer option. Still, I can't shake all of my upbringing.

Like you say- it's more feelings than anything else, plus the mysteries that still remain and, a few weird personal experiences. For example, a dream that actually happened a few weeks or months later. I don't think it was deja vu. I definitely remember I had dreamt it. Which made me wonder about predestiny and whether time is actually linear. I think personal experience is always the thing that feels the most compelling.

That said, I'd be open to hear a more rational, scientific explanation. I also know our brains are capable of f*cking with us. I sometimes 'see' things in the room when I just wake up- that aren't there. Like my dreams are briefly overlaid on reality.

I sometimes wonder if it's all just another evolutionary ploy though. Take a deep feeling of connection to nature. Surely, that would be a good thing to have in terms of survival. We need nature to survive. Wouldn't it be beneficial if we felt the urge to preserve it, rather than destroy the lot? It's a shame we've overcome that one as much as we have...

Strong connections or emotions though- to places, to our community, to individuals. Again- maybe all things that work in our favour when it comes to survival. Sometimes I wonder if it's all real or whether it's just that we find we have these strong emotions and we look for things to put them on.

I don't think it's so different to love. I find I will start obsessing about the most alpha man that happens to be around- limerence. Like, I must be wired to look for that and, I'll just find the most appropriate person to focus it on... and then, deeply regret it.

I just think we as a species have a deep need to know stuff, to feel important, to feel larger than we are in fact- immortality is quite a feat for something so vulnerable! Maybe we just latch on to things that give us what we need. I agree though- the similarities in religions are weird. Especially seeing as people couldn't travel that far in ancient times. I'm not a complete cynic but, I'd also accept that there might be non spiritual explanations for seemingly spiritual things.
The connection to love and limerence is a good note, because it goes to that excited state of emotion that can't be easily reached day-to-day. I think I wrote my best songs when I was most violently in psychic pain. The extremes get us to this idea I'm thinking of. Like you, I want it to be a more rational explanation, which is why the focus on quantum physics interests me so much.

Dreams are something I haven't delved into nearly as much as I probably need to. It seems very relevant. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
 
  • Love
Reactions: daley and Forever Sleep
derpyderpins

derpyderpins

In the Service of the Queen
Sep 19, 2023
1,809
What you say is constructive at many levels. The sincerity is a very positive sign.

The nature of the topic is that there are many valid pathways, which is why there are masters of all backgrounds, even atheism. Occasionally, people are not even actively seeking truth when they have transformative insights.

This is a double-edged sword, since there are also many pitfalls. For example, there have been teachers who may have a perfectly good understanding, or may have had insights, but are grossly unfit to teach. This is why I try and gauge people's temperament before making any suggestions. It's certainly not a one-size-fits-all.

We also have to consider that there, for example, are over half a billion followers of Buddhism. I doubt even 1% of them are enlightened, or on a serious spiritual path. From what I've seen, people are usually dragged into the tradition of their elders and are obliged to play along. This is a far, far cry from the red-hot determination of the success stories described by Phillip Kapleau.

Anyway, to the point. Yes, your own experience is by far the most important thing. Other people's awakenings mean nothing. The great traditions and celebrated masters are worth zero. In fact, the key techniques generally involve going deeper into your own experience to a place beyond thought.

Your own intuition is the highest teacher, but it needs to be distinguished from doubt-oriented thoughts. The mind tends to constantly mess up the process until we learn to see it for what it is. That is the hard part, and why most people struggle. This is where there is immense value in getting support from someone honest who has been through the process already.

I would not worry about other realms, purely because that is outside of immediate experience (unless it's not) and therefore is merely some sort of thought form.

I'd suggest checking out the work of Dr. Angelo Dilullo. He has a no-BS approach and has helped many people along the path. I'd be interested to know if this resonates. (Of course, this is open to everyone.)

I watched most of it. Found it interesting but thought they went off the rails a bit at the end. Going to try and write my impressions before I forget them.

The first thing is that these types of videos make me really wonder what other people experience in life and how far along whatever journey this is I am. I've been "inquiring" in that way for years, thinking that "I" am not simply my thoughts and preferences, so what am I, etc. it's strange to me how they talk as if people start this journey having never considered such things.

Second, I have an instinctive repulsion to this idea of rejecting "thoughts." I very much like realizing that "I" am not my thoughts. That's a very nice and useful perspective to gain. But my thoughts are a product of the "I", which I think does exist, contrary to these two. It may not be simple and it may not be fascinating, but my thoughts are tools that have developed over time to really solve problems in a measurable way, while also injuring me at times.

Which brings me to the next thing, which is that I really don't like the lack of practical applications in this type of talk. 'Oh yes, once you realize everything is boundless and nothing is real and everything is everything your suffering will end and you will feel so fulfilled.' Well, I may not be real but if whatever this sack of meat is doesn't get fed then whatever non-existent thing is creating these thoughts is going to suffer so the meat sack has to go to work every day. It's funny to me to picture perfectly enlightened awakened folks working various jobs and not getting anything done as they talk about the work itself not being real and whatnot.

So the thing with the coffee. "You see the coffee across the street, but that is just an image. Distance is not real, it's a picture your ego creates." Yeah okay but if I act on that assumption and walk across the street without looking and get hit by a ten ton truck there will be very real consequences of that. You can say the truck doesn't exist and that label is just made up in my ego and whatnot but the meat sack is going to be broken and smashed to pieces by the hunk of massive material.

I get that I probably sound a little annoyed, and honestly I was enjoying it at the beginning, but the more it went the less it resonated. It comes off as arrogant. "Smart people have the hardest time with this." Piss off. It just sounds like you want to be able to say you're better and smarter than "smart people," whoever that may be. "The world is nothing like what you see." I again direct you to the ten ton truck that I saw coming but Mr enlightened didn't think was there.

I enjoy the thought exercises. I enjoy thinking about how we perceive things. I enjoy the talk about how a tree is only a tree because people have decided to call it a tree, otherwise it would be nameless. That's all good stuff. But if it falls on me and kills me, the SOMETHING crushed my meat sack body and for some reason those thoughts I was making can't occur anymore.

I'm looking for something spiritual I can connect to the practical. I'd rather be dead or doing something in life while miserable than be happy by thinking nothing is real or matters and I don't exist.

Oh, but that wraps around perfectly, doesn't it? Stupid silly smart person with your thoughts and thinks, that's why you aren't good enough to awaken, because you keep asking questions.

That reminds me of religion again, where asking questions is generally frowned upon. But this goes a step further to rejecting all thoughts, be they questions or not.

So yeah, I obviously got something out of it lol but it didn't resonate. Sorry again for being a dick about it. I had a bad day and this stuff is really on my mind right now.
 
derpyderpins

derpyderpins

In the Service of the Queen
Sep 19, 2023
1,809
This website here offers a lot of different books and manuscripts on Gnosticism, Hermeticism, Manicheanism and Mandaeism:
gnosis.org

I found a lot of this to be very interesting, and have been poking around a bit more. I very much like viewing gnosticism as a psychology moreso than a religion. While the demiurge paints a nice picture of a being to rebel against, it corresponds more with what I am searching for to view such a concept as symbolic.

An imperfectly created world, humans having physical and psychic components, a dislike of strict man-made rules but a respect for freedom and liberty of other beings, and the spiritual journey to reach the higher state are all concepts that speak to me. I appreciate your input.
 
  • Love
Reactions: PhDone
P

PhDone

Student
Jul 29, 2024
185
What can I say, OP you've hit all my learning and growth over the last years on the head. The commonalities of all wisdom traditions are clear: we are all climbing the same mountain just with different views. And non-duality says we are all one. And Nikola Tesla tied this to science well before quantum mechanics. But QM has given the masses some greater rationality than religion. In a society whose prominent philosophies are sciencism and rationalism, people were never going to believe in a unified source until science said it was so. QM also backs many 'spiritual gifts' like prophetics or telepathy etc. Because of properties like non-local entanglement and the holographic info storage in cells and particles. There are so many books paralleling spiritual traditions with QM now. Cf Lazlo.

Re Jungian shared consciousness, again this talks to non-duality. And integral theory. That as we go from conscious to unconscious to super unconscious we share more and more. So our deepest consciousness is unified and hence we can access all wisdom. The cultural similarities stuff OP talked to totally reinforces this.

There are some super well read and experienced people on SaSu with this stuff. Ive been stretched in my understanding and reading here which is so great.

And yes, we look for proof, yet feeling in our gut there is something more is real. This is where wisdom comes from ultimately anyway. Not our minds, our 'shallow' consciousness. Many many people have had experiences that reinforce this. Maybe they can be explained by science or rationality, but again these are only philosophies, not fact. There are things that dont fit with our accepted models of life. Why do we have to force things into our existing models? The worlds models now are so much more advanced than decades or centuries ago. Centuries from now, if 'we' are still here, the door will have opened far further. The awakening process allows us to experience more….or does it have us fall more into the illusion????

I dont believe any of this is about looking for meaning either. The 'rules' around how this life works or why we are here are totally disputable. That is a separate argument from 'what is the nature of life and the universe?'

Thanks for this discussion, I find it super positive and helpful for finding peace in my ctb process too. What you, OP, talk to is something far deeper than the community spoon-fed versions of religion, God in the sky, heaven up there, hell down the other way, rules that control the masses. When you break through the surface of these Sunday school models there is a beautifully intriguing exploration of our source our foundational energy. Maybe the purpose of life is to just collectively feedback experiences and add to Universal (divine?) wisdom. Or maybe it is just to exist. Either way we came from something and somewhere. I highly doubt the Sunday school model is adequate, and so, relievingly, hell for all those that ctb is extremely unlikely.
 
avoid

avoid

Jul 31, 2023
287
The title "maybe all religions are right" reminded me of this scene from Futurama, season 3 episode 7.

View attachment so-every-religion-is-wrong-low-quality.mp4

I'm not well read on religions but I believe most if not all offer valuable lessons. Whether a religion is true or false has no bearing on what it can teach you, even if the religion is scientifically proven to be false at some point in the future. And if the day comes that a religious belief is proven to be true, even then I don't think I would fully align myself with the religion provided not doing so has no adverse effect on my after– or next life. So you could say I'm cherry-picking what I think will benefit me spiritually and emotionally.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Darkover
Replies
1
Views
131
Offtopic
lookup
lookup
Darkover
Replies
0
Views
140
Offtopic
Darkover
Darkover
Açucarzinho583
Replies
20
Views
1K
Politics & Philosophy
EvisceratedJester
EvisceratedJester