Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):
Ethereum (ETH):
Monero (XMR):
Is dying merely a means and not the goal?
Thread starterhoping to lose hope
Start date
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
I have a dog who I love very much. Played with her with a tennis ball a bit after watching some twin peaks tonight. I can't talk to her but its about as good as it gets nowadays
It can depend on why an individual wants to die in the first place. In the case of someone who is terminally ill: they do not want to actually die they just want to end the pain, and unfortunately dying is the only way to stop it - death would be a means in this case. However there are also people who commit suicide because they do want to die; for example there are philosophical arguments which argue that life is pointless or that there is no point in living. In other words they wish to die because to them death is the only position that makes sense, it is a non-state were you are not exposed to the monotony of life. In this case death is a goal.
Dying is the only comfort I have, this is the only thing I truly want. I have stupidly promised people I will stop trying to end my life but this just adds to my own desire to go. I wish I never have to wake up every day. But I do. My dreams torment me and living everyday in this world crushes me. I beg to go but still I'm here. Won't someone take this wretched life of mine to finally make me have peace.
I have a dog who I love very much. Played with her with a tennis ball a bit after watching some twin peaks tonight. I can't talk to her but its about as good as it gets nowadays
I totally understand: but the only certainty in philosophy is being uncertain. I have taken my pessimism to a new level where I seriously consider death could bring on a even worse existence and it scares me.
Oh what did you think of benetar?
I just spend ages looking for the author of a book I read by a south american philosopher who did a better job than benetar and much more in depth but cannot find it at the moment
Did you think benetar did a great job arguing for his position?
Oh what did you think of benetar?
I just spend ages looking for the author of a book I read by a south american philosopher who did a better job than benetar and much more in depth but cannot find it at the moment
Did you think benetar did a great job arguing for his position?
I think Benetar does a good job discussing the theory on a generic level. If I were to introduce antinatalism to a friend I would recommend reading him. I have not read conspiracy against the human race nor the Peter zappfe essay but I definitely will now!
He is not comprehensive and does not attempt to show critiques to his own ideas such as the asymmetry argument.
I felt like it was a very poor job at a work purporting to be philosophy.
Given that he does not go in depth yet still is written in a way the average person likely wont enjoy I would prefer to suggest Sarah Perry to them despite criticizing some of her arguments greatly as it is actually enjoyable to read.
If you are writing a philosophical text to defend what is a controversial position you better dig deep and fortify it from scrutiny instead of making the entire idea you are defending look worse off by association.
Sorry I just get quite worked up over his work which I have read.
He is not comprehensive and does not attempt to show critiques to his own ideas such as the asymmetry argument.
I felt like it was a very poor job at a work purporting to be philosophy.
Given that he does not go in depth yet still is written in a way the average person likely wont enjoy I would prefer to suggest Sarah Perry to them despite criticizing some of her arguments greatly as it is actually enjoyable to read.
If you are writing a philosophical text to defend what is a controversial position you better dig deep and fortify it from scrutiny instead of making the entire idea you are defending look worse off by association.
Sorry I just get quite worked up over his work which I have read.
No, you make good points. I didn't really see it that way I guess since I read his work first, I admit I am fairly new to antinatalism. I plan to reread Benatar now with what you said in mind.
I apologize I didn't get to you sooner! I've been busy! But I'm currently doing DBT and I'm in the early stages but I can tell you right now it does work. I know someone else who has BPD who did DBT and it helped them a lot!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.