if a person's post is about, or even just connects to their experience of their existence, identities will always be an inherent factor in their 'voice', 'how they got here', etc. yes, to a point identity is political but at what point do we determine their personhood as also political? I only mean that a person's motive to CTB, or considering it, will of course be informed by their experiences and those experiences will (often) be shaped by the way they individually navigate the world. whether gender, sexuality, illness or disability, financial stability, race or culture, the list goes on and on, .. any post in which a person provides any background as to why they want out or to CTB or however one might otherwise employ euphemism is automatically going to include factors of their lived experience.
to echo the many others, if a title is too vague or brief and the first three sentences trouble you, you are under no obligation to continue to trouble yourself.
breaking down these arguably, questionably 'political' posts into each their own subsection would result, probably, imo, in a large and growing number of subsections, which frankly, given that the posts of grievance aren't political stances being stated, feels unnecessarily divisive.
people have countless possible reasons to be on the forum, and to consider CTB. we don't have to agree or validate or even read. it feels a bit extreme to say, though, 'I can't relate, and find it irksome, therefore, away with it'.
edit: just want to add, if a post veers so off topic that it either is or becomes primarily debate etc., where it would be clearly better suited in a politics or philosophy subsection, I've no qualms there. I've no qualms with the existence of these sections, my response was meant to be about posts relevant for this section that might have the context mentioned by OP.
