F
Forever Sleep
Earned it we have...
- May 4, 2022
- 9,852
Years ago, I was going through a particularly rough patch and went to see a college therapist. They referred me to my GP for some antidepressants (which did nothing.)
The doctor was actually very nice and sympathetic but something she said has always stuck in my head: That I was issolated and in a vulnerable state which put me at risk of acting on my thoughts and- 'Wouldn't that be a shame?' It struck me that she and maybe the majority of pro-lifers must think that we experience ideation as intrusive thoughts. Maybe some people do but I certainly don't and pretty much never have. I was certainly scared the first time I had them- I was only 10. But I never thought it would be a 'shame' if I died. Not for me anyhow! I recognise it would upset other people though- that's why I'm still here. I wanted to say- it wouldn't be a shame, it would be a relief but I didn't want to risk a trip to a psyche ward.
I had one of those welfare checks after the whole IC SN business. The police didn't want to leave before putting me in touch with a helpline. I agreed and they phoned me. I kept telling them I was fine- to get rid of them. Again- the first lady I spoke to was nice. But again- it was a case of- 'Don't you think we should talk about these disturbing thoughts you are having?' Well- no- because they aren't disturbing to me! The only thing that is disturbing is the difficulty in acting on them. I'm stuck here because I don't want to upset my Dad. Practicality wise- due to not being given the freedom to bodily autonomy, I'm stuck with some shady curing salt to perform some risky experiement with- with no idea on how it might actually affect me. That's disturbing definitely but- as needs must ultimately.
Anyhow- I wonder how many ways there are of experiencing ideation. And I wonder if pro-lifers ever register that some of us are completely at ease with these thoughts. I guess they think that percentage of us are simply crazy. It's an easy opt out really. Just call someone deranged and you don't have to argue with them anymore.
The doctor was actually very nice and sympathetic but something she said has always stuck in my head: That I was issolated and in a vulnerable state which put me at risk of acting on my thoughts and- 'Wouldn't that be a shame?' It struck me that she and maybe the majority of pro-lifers must think that we experience ideation as intrusive thoughts. Maybe some people do but I certainly don't and pretty much never have. I was certainly scared the first time I had them- I was only 10. But I never thought it would be a 'shame' if I died. Not for me anyhow! I recognise it would upset other people though- that's why I'm still here. I wanted to say- it wouldn't be a shame, it would be a relief but I didn't want to risk a trip to a psyche ward.
I had one of those welfare checks after the whole IC SN business. The police didn't want to leave before putting me in touch with a helpline. I agreed and they phoned me. I kept telling them I was fine- to get rid of them. Again- the first lady I spoke to was nice. But again- it was a case of- 'Don't you think we should talk about these disturbing thoughts you are having?' Well- no- because they aren't disturbing to me! The only thing that is disturbing is the difficulty in acting on them. I'm stuck here because I don't want to upset my Dad. Practicality wise- due to not being given the freedom to bodily autonomy, I'm stuck with some shady curing salt to perform some risky experiement with- with no idea on how it might actually affect me. That's disturbing definitely but- as needs must ultimately.
Anyhow- I wonder how many ways there are of experiencing ideation. And I wonder if pro-lifers ever register that some of us are completely at ease with these thoughts. I guess they think that percentage of us are simply crazy. It's an easy opt out really. Just call someone deranged and you don't have to argue with them anymore.