divinemistress36
Angelic
- Jan 1, 2024
- 4,146
-
Hey Guest,
An update on the OFCOM situation: As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. OFCOM, the UK’s communications regulator, has singled out our community, demanding compliance with their Online Safety Act despite our minimal UK presence. This is a blatant overreach, and they have been sending letters pressuring us to comply with their censorship agenda.
Our platform is already blocked by many UK ISPs, yet they continue their attempts to stifle free speech. Standing up to this kind of regulatory overreach requires lots of resources to maintain our infrastructure and fight back against these unjust demands. If you value our community and want to support us during this time, we would greatly appreciate any and all donations.
Read more about the situation here: Click to View Post
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC): 39deg9i6Zp1GdrwyKkqZU6rAbsEspvLBJtEthereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8
sserafim
brighter than the sun, that’s just me
- Sep 13, 2023
- 9,024
No I mean why we don't have the right/option to exit
onbekend
Experienced
- Jan 14, 2024
- 266
Life may be terrible in my experience, But if others find it enjoyable I won't stop them. So my answer is no, I wouldn't prevent all life from coming into existence unless it was only me.
divinemistress36
Angelic
- Jan 1, 2024
- 4,146
Oh sorry I'm slow . Because the government makes to much money off wage slaves and even if someone can't work the pharmaceutical companies make bank off sick people
Generally no, unless the circumstances are exceptional it's better to let life play out
