divinemistress36
Illuminated
- Jan 1, 2024
- 3,425
-
Hey Guest,
As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. The UK and OFCOM has singled out this community and have been focusing its censorship efforts here. It takes a good amount of resources to maintain the infrastructure for our community and to resist this censorship. We would appreciate any and all donations.
Bitcoin Address (BTC): 39deg9i6Zp1GdrwyKkqZU6rAbsEspvLBJt
Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9
Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVS
DD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8 -
Security update: At around 2:28AM EST, the site was labeled as malicious by Google erroneously, causing users to get a "Dangerous site" warning in most browsers. It appears that this was done by mistake and has been reversed by Google. It may take a few hours for you to stop seeing those warnings.
If you're still getting these warnings, please let a member of staff know.
sserafim
brighter than the sun, that’s just me
- Sep 13, 2023
- 9,015
No I mean why we don't have the right/option to exit
onbekend
Experienced
- Jan 14, 2024
- 266
Life may be terrible in my experience, But if others find it enjoyable I won't stop them. So my answer is no, I wouldn't prevent all life from coming into existence unless it was only me.
divinemistress36
Illuminated
- Jan 1, 2024
- 3,425
Oh sorry I'm slow . Because the government makes to much money off wage slaves and even if someone can't work the pharmaceutical companies make bank off sick people
Generally no, unless the circumstances are exceptional it's better to let life play out
Similar threads
Venting
no rational being would choose to come alive in a world without the option to end their life
- Darkover
- Offtopic
Offtopic
FinalVoid25
