TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,872
As we pro-choicers, we are no stranger towards seeing this obligatory message plastered just about everywhere and anywhere with regards to topics about death, mental health, and/or other contents. However, this is very insulting and presumptuous to those who are really determined to CTB because it lumps them all into the same category (in other words, treats them the same as those who impulsively or rashly chose to CTB without thinking it through). This couldn't be further from the truth because if anything, most of us pro-choicers, especially those who have been on SaSu and have deliberated on our decision for an extended period of time knows very well that we just want out. While it's possible that some people "may" change their mind, most who are at that point often don't and just want to be at peace, even if it means to CTB. Before I go on, I want to address the obligatory part. I know that most articles and media/content that talk about such things often have it and part of me believes that they sort of do that in order to shield themselves from liability but also as a secondary purpose, to virtue signal.
Anyways, so onto the main point of this article. Why do I have problem with seeing that obligatory (or even if not) statement in articles and such? The problem with that is the presumption of ignorance as well as invalidating and labeling CTB as some 'medical problem' to be cured rather than a free action. Of course, no one who is serious about CTB'ing would ever openly admit it especially if they know (almost) everyone will try to intervene to foil or obstruct their plans to exit suffering! A good analogy would be where an interrogator expects that a criminal would ever come out and announce their intentions to get caught, most people know that isn't the case and criminals wouldn't just willing sabotage and foil themselves! (Note: I don't condone criminals and their actions nor illegal activity, I'm simply drawing an analogy to clarify my point in more detail.)
Therefore when people claim "If you are having thoughts of CTB, call the three digit number!" or any other similar statements, it is just akin to saying to a suspect or criminal (or even anyone) to incriminate themselves! So imagine if someone said to would be suspects, criminals, or even innocent people "If you are having thoughts of doing something illegal or unlawful, report yourself to law enforcement!" Almost nobody (unless they purposely want to self-sabotage or get caught and get into (legal) trouble) would ever do such a thing! So in conclusion, that's how I see the statement of anti-choicers and pro-lifers trying to get those who are thinking about CTB to confess their intention or plans in order to intervene against the pro-choicers who just want others to mind their own business and not meddle with their bodily autonomy! So this is why seeing and hearing such a statement is rather just insulting and I compared it to how it was like getting someone to incriminate or otherwise say something that could be used against them, even if it isn't in the arena of the legal system. (Note: I used the word incriminate, but in this case, I'm referring to statements that if someone admits they are thinking of CTB or CTB ideation, it could be used against them, meaning they could end up incurring unwanted treatment, possibly temporary loss of liberty (depending on situation), and other negative impacts on their life.) While others may justify it as a necessary evil (most anti-choicers and pro-lifers), that's another article all together and I won't get into that here since this article/vent was mostly about the obligatory, annoying virtue signaling statement that we see plastered just about everywhere.
Anyways, so onto the main point of this article. Why do I have problem with seeing that obligatory (or even if not) statement in articles and such? The problem with that is the presumption of ignorance as well as invalidating and labeling CTB as some 'medical problem' to be cured rather than a free action. Of course, no one who is serious about CTB'ing would ever openly admit it especially if they know (almost) everyone will try to intervene to foil or obstruct their plans to exit suffering! A good analogy would be where an interrogator expects that a criminal would ever come out and announce their intentions to get caught, most people know that isn't the case and criminals wouldn't just willing sabotage and foil themselves! (Note: I don't condone criminals and their actions nor illegal activity, I'm simply drawing an analogy to clarify my point in more detail.)
Therefore when people claim "If you are having thoughts of CTB, call the three digit number!" or any other similar statements, it is just akin to saying to a suspect or criminal (or even anyone) to incriminate themselves! So imagine if someone said to would be suspects, criminals, or even innocent people "If you are having thoughts of doing something illegal or unlawful, report yourself to law enforcement!" Almost nobody (unless they purposely want to self-sabotage or get caught and get into (legal) trouble) would ever do such a thing! So in conclusion, that's how I see the statement of anti-choicers and pro-lifers trying to get those who are thinking about CTB to confess their intention or plans in order to intervene against the pro-choicers who just want others to mind their own business and not meddle with their bodily autonomy! So this is why seeing and hearing such a statement is rather just insulting and I compared it to how it was like getting someone to incriminate or otherwise say something that could be used against them, even if it isn't in the arena of the legal system. (Note: I used the word incriminate, but in this case, I'm referring to statements that if someone admits they are thinking of CTB or CTB ideation, it could be used against them, meaning they could end up incurring unwanted treatment, possibly temporary loss of liberty (depending on situation), and other negative impacts on their life.) While others may justify it as a necessary evil (most anti-choicers and pro-lifers), that's another article all together and I won't get into that here since this article/vent was mostly about the obligatory, annoying virtue signaling statement that we see plastered just about everywhere.