FrailPaleStaleMaleSS
Hopeless addict druggicel
- Oct 21, 2019
- 140
Years back I did a brief search to see if it were an option. Seems nowadays it's the same. But hear me out on this because I see some pros to this sort of thing.
So disregarding the initial negative connotations as well as botched old and unreliable methods for lobotomy, I'd be a proponent for modern day, revised, and precise lobotomies without failure. In my opinion, there wouldn't be much difference between that and self euthenisia. Both completely remove ones emotions, thoughts, personality, memory. You essentially become an organic robot without consciousness or sentience. The emotions, thoughts and memories I'd say are what we mainly seek to remove upon our suicides.
One could argue that it is pointless, and this merely is a hypothetical, I can't see it ever happening. But because of how many bullshit "ethics" and "moral issues" surround suicide and assisted suicide because of the whole death element, I don't see why this would be a bad compromise.
If people so wished, they could quite literally "die" and escape a life that one deems not worth continuing with, and all the religious or moral nuts can take comfort in the fact that no one died. I personally think society is selfish as shit for not allowing euthenisia, but opposing this most definitely is too.
I know for me personally, I wouldn't mind either way, just so long as I can no long feel, think or be aware of anything. So as a hypothetical it seems a pretty decent idea if it were allowed. Perhaps unnerving for some, but I'm sure for the patient it would likely be the same.
So disregarding the initial negative connotations as well as botched old and unreliable methods for lobotomy, I'd be a proponent for modern day, revised, and precise lobotomies without failure. In my opinion, there wouldn't be much difference between that and self euthenisia. Both completely remove ones emotions, thoughts, personality, memory. You essentially become an organic robot without consciousness or sentience. The emotions, thoughts and memories I'd say are what we mainly seek to remove upon our suicides.
One could argue that it is pointless, and this merely is a hypothetical, I can't see it ever happening. But because of how many bullshit "ethics" and "moral issues" surround suicide and assisted suicide because of the whole death element, I don't see why this would be a bad compromise.
If people so wished, they could quite literally "die" and escape a life that one deems not worth continuing with, and all the religious or moral nuts can take comfort in the fact that no one died. I personally think society is selfish as shit for not allowing euthenisia, but opposing this most definitely is too.
I know for me personally, I wouldn't mind either way, just so long as I can no long feel, think or be aware of anything. So as a hypothetical it seems a pretty decent idea if it were allowed. Perhaps unnerving for some, but I'm sure for the patient it would likely be the same.