TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,874
Recently had a thought that I pondered about and it is about how pro-lifers expect people to endure the things that they themselves wouldn't. During the Covid19 pandemic (from early 2020-late 2022 or so) is a good example showing how people deal with the loss of freedom and autonomy due to lockdowns and such. I'm using this example because it best illustrates how most normies (by extension, majority of them are pro-lifers) behave and respond when faced with said restrictions and the reality of the pandemic curbing their pre-pandemic and normal lives. Also, I will be comparing this to certain shitty life predicaments to show the hypocrisy of pro-lifers. It is no surprise that pro-lifers are hypocritical, and this thread is just yet another good example using the pandemic as an example to expose pro-lifer hypocrisy and how pro-lifers simply cannot practice what they preach nor handle what they expect others to handle (perhaps worse than their 'temporary' loss of freedom and normal lifestyle).
So during the pandemic, especially in 2020, when the virus was still new and before vaccines were a thing, there were restrictions such as lockdowns, masking, and lots of changes that upended normal life, such as social distancing, cancellation of events, going virtual instead of in-person, and many more. Most normies and pro-lifers could barely even tolerate going for weeks (let alone months, or even over a year or more) of such dramatic change in their previous lives! Even during a small respite in the pandemic, sometime in mid 2021 (when people were vaccinated and such but before new variants of covid came about and made restrictions come back again until later in 2022), people are desperate to go back to their old lives and these are generally physically healthy, able-bodied people.
Now these same people (the normie masses and by extension, mostly pro-lifers) expect certain people in worse predicaments than them, usually the newly debilitated, handicapped, or impaired individuals to endure what is worse than what they face, but for a much longer (perhaps indefinite or until natural death) timespan, usually many years, decades, or even a lifetime of suffering (if the illness or impairment is severe enough) when they themselves (normies and pro-lifers') can barely (and most likely not) tolerate a few years (with temporary periods of respite) of major changes. That's where the hypocrisy lies in! In fact, I think most pro-lifers wouldn't last even a fraction of what they expect others' (in worse predicaments) to live through! They (pro-lifers) would likely give up or attempt to CTB if they were in such situations (or at least wishing they could).
In conclusion, I made this thread to highlight and show not only how hypocritical normies and pro-lifers are, but also explain about the difference in severity and their expectations for others in worse predicaments to "endure and suffer" through life when they themselves cannot even tolerate a shorter (temporary and with periods of respite) inconvenience and upheaval of their lifestyle. It's pretty infuriating to think about the situation itself. Does anyone else share similar sentiments?
So during the pandemic, especially in 2020, when the virus was still new and before vaccines were a thing, there were restrictions such as lockdowns, masking, and lots of changes that upended normal life, such as social distancing, cancellation of events, going virtual instead of in-person, and many more. Most normies and pro-lifers could barely even tolerate going for weeks (let alone months, or even over a year or more) of such dramatic change in their previous lives! Even during a small respite in the pandemic, sometime in mid 2021 (when people were vaccinated and such but before new variants of covid came about and made restrictions come back again until later in 2022), people are desperate to go back to their old lives and these are generally physically healthy, able-bodied people.
Now these same people (the normie masses and by extension, mostly pro-lifers) expect certain people in worse predicaments than them, usually the newly debilitated, handicapped, or impaired individuals to endure what is worse than what they face, but for a much longer (perhaps indefinite or until natural death) timespan, usually many years, decades, or even a lifetime of suffering (if the illness or impairment is severe enough) when they themselves (normies and pro-lifers') can barely (and most likely not) tolerate a few years (with temporary periods of respite) of major changes. That's where the hypocrisy lies in! In fact, I think most pro-lifers wouldn't last even a fraction of what they expect others' (in worse predicaments) to live through! They (pro-lifers) would likely give up or attempt to CTB if they were in such situations (or at least wishing they could).
In conclusion, I made this thread to highlight and show not only how hypocritical normies and pro-lifers are, but also explain about the difference in severity and their expectations for others in worse predicaments to "endure and suffer" through life when they themselves cannot even tolerate a shorter (temporary and with periods of respite) inconvenience and upheaval of their lifestyle. It's pretty infuriating to think about the situation itself. Does anyone else share similar sentiments?