• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
Lilithium

Lilithium

✨🌌~w o o f~🌌✨
Jan 6, 2026
59
Hey y'all! I've been active on the threads trying to workshop the benzocaine method that Jisatsu came up with/may have ctb with. From the available literature, we know that it isn't benzocaine itself but it's metabolite, benzocaine hydroxylamine, that causes methemoglobinemia.

Having said that... this got me thinking that if the hydroxylamine metabolite is what causes the MetHb, would other hydroxylamine compounds potentially be viable methods?

Bit of a reach, but hydroxylamine sulfate came to mind as it causes methemoglobinemia that is intractable even with methylene blue, as well as sulfhemoglobinemia. It is potentially a more irritating compound than benzocaine as far as tissue goes, but it is also more readily absorbed both when ingested and through skin, and on paper it should induce MetHb and SulfHb fairly quickly. Crucially, you can purchase it relatively freely at least in the US.

There's very little literature on it but I will go fish for what exists in the morning. Admittedly I do not know for sure how much more or less irritating it is to mucous membranes compared to Benzocaine, SN, and KN. I believe it is rated at the same level as benzocaine for skin irritation, but it seems to be more reactive.

Just wanted to throw out the thought for the sake of science! but please do tell me if this is not at all viable, or if I'm missing something.
 
piercedheart

piercedheart

Mortician Mommy
May 29, 2023
68
You'd need quite a lot of it for it to be effective, so there is a very big chance of failure as your body will fight tooth and nail to get rid of it. It will be extremely painful and unpleasant, and will damage your kidneys, leaving you even worse off than you started. I'd strongly recommend not to bother with it.
 
P

Praestat_Mori

Mori praestat, quam haec pati!
May 21, 2023
13,241
These are only my thoughts.

If this was a reliable method it'd be mentioned in the PPH.

Any methods that rely heavily on metabolism are unreliable imo. Best example CTB by apple/apricot/bitter almonds seeds.
 

Similar threads

LostZombie
Replies
19
Views
3K
Suicide Discussion
pthnrdnojvsc
pthnrdnojvsc
gothbird
Replies
89
Views
21K
Suicide Discussion
4hours-of-goobing
4hours-of-goobing
SomewhatLoved
Replies
3
Views
436
Suicide Discussion
divinemistress87
divinemistress87
R
Replies
7
Views
3K
Suicide Discussion
guitarsteve
G