
meetapple
Mage
- Jun 3, 2021
- 585
Since suicide would make it difficult to donate organs after death would you be willing to donate your kidney or other organs before death?
UK users: Due to a formal investigation into this site by Ofcom under the UK Online Safety Act 2023, we strongly recommend using a trusted, no-logs VPN. This will help protect your privacy, bypass censorship, and maintain secure access to the site. Read the full VPN guide here.
Today, OFCOM launched an official investigation into Sanctioned Suicide under the UK’s Online Safety Act. This has already made headlines across the UK.
This is a clear and unprecedented overreach by a foreign regulator against a U.S.-based platform. We reject this interference and will be defending the site’s existence and mission.
In addition to our public response, we are currently seeking legal representation to ensure the best possible defense in this matter. If you are a lawyer or know of one who may be able to assist, please contact us at [email protected].
Read our statement here:
Donate via cryptocurrency:
I think you could do a life insurance policy… At least in United States but I think you have to survive for two years after signing the policy for it to remain validIf only there was a place to sell your body for harvested organs. I really want to leave my family some good sum amount of money in exchange for their trouble raising me. I know it will not do from their point of view but that way I can leave while making sure they at least have enough to live comfortably after I am gone. I really wish that is an option.
That wouldnt work in shithole i am in. They already account for things like suicide as being invalid basis for life policyI think you could do a life insurance policy… At least in United States but I think you have to survive for two years after signing the policy for it to remain valid
Maybe in China one day lolThis got me thinking..... there are people desperate for organs. More people waiting for transplants than organs available and many of them don't get their transplant in time. It got me contemplating the potential for making a mutual arrangement whereby one gets to ctb peacefully in exchange for the relevant organ/s. It's a bit pie in the sky, I know. Just one of those 'where there's a will' kinda thoughts. It kind of makes sense from a moral standpoint when thinking in ths eyes of government etc. One party is going to die either way. Doctors insist on saving lives and are opposed to ctb but would they take a different stance if one life was lost to save another.
Of course compatibility would be an issue to address but all things being well this would potentially be a great compromise for euthanasia to be possible with minimal moral issues clouding things as people could sign up to a system by which they go get tested for all the relevant specifics for transplant and be provided a peaceful euthanasia (assisted or otherwise) and in the process help save a life therefore mitigating the loss perceived in the form of worker bee/consumer.
I honestly feel that is a good solution. The only issue is that it would exclude people with unviable organs for whichever reason. It would however be a good first step and serve to desensitise the public to euthanasia. From there things could progress over time.
It will never happen though will it!? :(
Looks erm, tasty and nutritious!
Nah I need them for my drug useSince suicide would make it difficult to donate organs after death would you be willing to donate your kidney or other organs before death?
It would be brilliant!This got me thinking..... there are people desperate for organs. More people waiting for transplants than organs available and many of them don't get their transplant in time. It got me contemplating the potential for making a mutual arrangement whereby one gets to ctb peacefully in exchange for the relevant organ/s. It's a bit pie in the sky, I know. Just one of those 'where there's a will' kinda thoughts. It kind of makes sense from a moral standpoint when thinking in ths eyes of government etc. One party is going to die either way. Doctors insist on saving lives and are opposed to ctb but would they take a different stance if one life was lost to save another.
Of course compatibility would be an issue to address but all things being well this would potentially be a great compromise for euthanasia to be possible with minimal moral issues clouding things as people could sign up to a system by which they go get tested for all the relevant specifics for transplant and be provided a peaceful euthanasia (assisted or otherwise) and in the process help save a life therefore mitigating the loss perceived in the form of worker bee/consumer.
I honestly feel that is a good solution. The only issue is that it would exclude people with unviable organs for whichever reason. It would however be a good first step and serve to desensitise the public to euthanasia. From there things could progress over time.
It will never happen though will it!? :(