I guess it the reagents sodium nitrite and HCl were in equilibrium with the products of NaCk, NO and nitrate, a change in the concentration of the HCl would definitely change there amount of product. So, if HCl production, or the active H+ ion, concentration decreasedn( ie. There would be a less acidic environment (increased pH) and the equation would be driven to the left, favoring sodium nitrite to remain but less amount of salt, NO and nitrate. But, this is if there is a steady state equilibrium. I do not know of other specific details such as heat production or not.
When thinking about Stan's guide when it states that there isn't enough stomach acid (HCl) to mix with SN, then more SN remains basically unchanged (unable to interact with HCl) and delivered to the small intestine. This seems to make sense overall. However, if looked HCl reacts to SN in the stomach, then it seems logical that there will be less salt, NO and nitrate production.
I am not a chemist nor an expert in this area and can only make comments of what I know. What I do know is that the " behavior" of the gut is changed by using histamine blockers (cimetedine, ranitidine, etc and by PPI. They both at on parietal cells of the stomach to reduce hydrogen ion production. Antacids, such as calcium carbonate, only "soak up" some stomach acid and reduce acidity to a minimal extent and not as defective as the other 2 types. PPIs are more effective than histamine blockers, but take more days to become effective.
So, I don't know if I should take a PPI or stick with the HE blockers. I am wondering if a beta blocker would be helpful in the overall process as a potentiator???. PPH recommend it but I'm not sure at this point. I'll try and search through some more threads.
Does anybody have any suggestions? I know the decision is mine in the end but any theories about even using an acid regulator or not? I know some people on this forum have mentioned that they won't but I forget exactly their reasoning