S
scientificmethid
Member
- Feb 12, 2024
- 32
40/L per minute seems like a lot. That's a lot of air moving and I think you'll have major leaks around your mask seal from sheer volume of air movement at 40/LPM+I've seen the standard 25 L/min nitrogen flow rate mentioned in multiple sources (like PPEH), but I suspect that number has more to do with regulator limitations than optimal gas flow. Many click-style regulators top out at 25 L/min, which may have set the standard by default.
My current setup provides 40 L/min total:
This configuration seems solid, but I'm open to upgrading the second regulator if there's a meaningful benefit to reaching 50 L/min total. I'm not trying to scrape by on "good enough." I want certainty, and I want to ensure the least suffering possible—rapid oxygen displacement, continuous CO₂ flushing, and no physiological surprises.
- Tank A: 25 L/min into the EEBD hood's main inlet (which includes a built-in exhalation valve)
- Tank B: 15 L/min through a second line routed like in a standard exit bag configuration into the EEBD hood.
For reference, EEBDs used in fire escapes recommend 36-40 L/min just to support high ventilation and toxic gas clearance. Since nitrogen is inert, and since there's no oxygen support involved, it seems reasonable to meet or exceed that benchmark.
One side note: I'm not at all concerned about sound or airflow. I sleep with a fan pointed at my face every night—so if anything, the sensation of gas moving near my face will feel familiar, maybe even comforting.
If anyone with technical experience or first-hand insight sees an issue—or has thoughts on whether going from 40 L/min to 50 L/min meaningfully improves outcomes—I'd really appreciate your input.