TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,874
This isn't the first nor the last time a situation like this is going to happen and in this case, it is a classic example of pro-lifers not even practicing what they preach. I get that death can be harsh for people to experience, especially that of someone they know (or sometimes even strangers in general), but I figured I point out the hypocrisy of this particular situation.
This thread on Reddit (quoted below) just shows how egotistical one can be.
Now keep in mind I'm not going to deny that having someone die or experiencing bereavement isn't traumatic. It is especially for the person losing someone (the survivor(s)), but the hypocrisy lies in the fact that people are often quick to dismiss and play the "nobody is entitled to anything" card when it comes to relationships, human and civil rights (excluding the right to die), and many other aspects and areas in life. Yet, when it comes to bodily autonomy regarding death, suddenly they no longer play the card and even after one is successful (not that the deceased will suffer anymore consequence as the dead have no capacity nor ability to experience the aftermath), they make it all about themselves.
In a previous thread, I talked about how ceasing (in the form of blocking/ignoring someone) all forms of communication is de facto as if that particular person is dead to the individual (because when someone is literally dead, there is no future interaction or anything with said person(s), and cutting all contact with them is more/less the same). Another thread that I wrote years ago also highlights how people are just uncomfortable with the act itself (and also the aftermath), which is again their ego and their interests rather than the person suffering.
However, when it comes to having the knowledge of someone's death, it somehow just bothers them (the survivor or recipient of said news), yet when they remain ignorant or lack knowledge of such an event, it doesn't. This just proves it's not about the person they are mourning, but the fact of their moral, atavistic worldview being shattered. What they don't know can't hurt them applies pretty well in these situations.
So suppose they were under the impression that their ex (or whoever the person is, could be a stranger or a random person even…), was alive (even if untrue or they were operating under such a pretense) then they wouldn't be hurt by it. Their life would still go on as per default (without the knowledge of said person's death), which again just proves that it's the knowledge of the death that bothers them rather than death itself. This is kind of similar (albeit not quite the same) of the metaphysical and philosophical problem of "A tree falling in the forest and no one is there to hear it fall" situation.
What are your thoughts on this, is my observation more or less spot on? Again, as I conclude this thread, I do want to emphasize that losing someone can be hard so I don't want to detract from it. I'm merely writing this thread to expose the hypocrisy and irony of how people make others' death all about them (ego and selfishness).
This thread on Reddit (quoted below) just shows how egotistical one can be.
"I just found out a couple hours ago.
I don't know what to do, I don't know how to cope with this. We broke up two months ago. We cared for each other very much and had been together for two and half years. In that time in spite of loving each other very much we had issues that did not resolve even with countless discussions.
He called me last night to get closure and we talked for a few hours. He was trying to understand why I left and why I wasn't ready or willing to try again. I did my best to explain that while I would always love him, I could not be with him.
He said that his main purpose in life right now was me, and to get to a point in where I'd be willing to get back together. I said that it wasn't healthy to look at me that way, I told him that he should be motivated to improve his life for himself. I also made it clear that his chance to work things out had been when we were together and I when I was trying, not after I had already been burnt out and left.
I told him to please respect my boundaries and to stop trying to convince me to change my mind.
He said a a tearful goodbye.
An hour later, at 2:30am he shot himself.
I am in absolute shock. I am horrified and sad and I don't know what to do.
I feel so sick to my stomach and I keep going from emptiness, to crying, to anger that he would do this, and I feel completely useless.
If there is anyone who knows how to cope with this sort of situation, or has any advice, I would be very grateful because I am feeling so lost in this moment."
Now keep in mind I'm not going to deny that having someone die or experiencing bereavement isn't traumatic. It is especially for the person losing someone (the survivor(s)), but the hypocrisy lies in the fact that people are often quick to dismiss and play the "nobody is entitled to anything" card when it comes to relationships, human and civil rights (excluding the right to die), and many other aspects and areas in life. Yet, when it comes to bodily autonomy regarding death, suddenly they no longer play the card and even after one is successful (not that the deceased will suffer anymore consequence as the dead have no capacity nor ability to experience the aftermath), they make it all about themselves.
In a previous thread, I talked about how ceasing (in the form of blocking/ignoring someone) all forms of communication is de facto as if that particular person is dead to the individual (because when someone is literally dead, there is no future interaction or anything with said person(s), and cutting all contact with them is more/less the same). Another thread that I wrote years ago also highlights how people are just uncomfortable with the act itself (and also the aftermath), which is again their ego and their interests rather than the person suffering.
However, when it comes to having the knowledge of someone's death, it somehow just bothers them (the survivor or recipient of said news), yet when they remain ignorant or lack knowledge of such an event, it doesn't. This just proves it's not about the person they are mourning, but the fact of their moral, atavistic worldview being shattered. What they don't know can't hurt them applies pretty well in these situations.
So suppose they were under the impression that their ex (or whoever the person is, could be a stranger or a random person even…), was alive (even if untrue or they were operating under such a pretense) then they wouldn't be hurt by it. Their life would still go on as per default (without the knowledge of said person's death), which again just proves that it's the knowledge of the death that bothers them rather than death itself. This is kind of similar (albeit not quite the same) of the metaphysical and philosophical problem of "A tree falling in the forest and no one is there to hear it fall" situation.
What are your thoughts on this, is my observation more or less spot on? Again, as I conclude this thread, I do want to emphasize that losing someone can be hard so I don't want to detract from it. I'm merely writing this thread to expose the hypocrisy and irony of how people make others' death all about them (ego and selfishness).